Staff are striking at a controversial homeless charity

Unite infographic about St Mungos
Support us and go ad-free

Staff at a controversial homeless charity have recently voted to strike. It comes amid claims of ‘threats’ to jobs, working conditions and homeless peoples’ services, And now, the union involved has taken to social media to ‘expose’ the charity’s alleged wrong-doing.

St Mungo’s staff on strike

St Mungo’s is a national charity for homeless people. But it’s currently in an industrial dispute with Unite the Union. As the union wrote:

The issues in the dispute have remained the same and centre on the tearing up of the junior staffing cap, which members fear risk a reinstatement of race to the bottom terms and conditions, an onerous sickness policy and disproportionate use of grievance and disciplinary procedures.

This is the second time Unite balloted St Mungo’s staff. The first did not meet the government’s 50% threshold of members taking part. Since the second ballot, Unite has tried to reason with St Mungo’s. It wrote an open letter to the charity’s board. In it, Unite said its members were:

unhappy at the draconian use of disciplinary procedures, which are disproportionate and unfairly applied, and of a sickness policy which is so punitive it is making people sicker with stress. None of these issues have been addressed.

It said that it was open to talks:

Unite’s door remains open…

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

We very much hope the board will use its influence to encourage senior management to return to the table, so that our members can get back to what they do best; helping homeless people rebuild their lives.

But this didn’t work. So, at the start of February Unite’s members voted to strike.

“Seriously understaffed”

The south-west branch of Unite has been sharing infographics about the strike on Twitter:

And people have been supporting Unite members’ decision:

The charity says…

But St Mungo’s has hit back. It’s chief executive Howard Sinclair said:

We are disappointed with the ballot result. We made a series of offers that Unite officials refused to engage with. Our offers remain on the table. We are not cutting pay, altering staff terms and conditions nor making enforced redundancies. We continue to believe a strike is disproportionate and unnecessary…

Meanwhile, the charity is actively trying to dispel the notion that it has a problem. It said in a statement:

53% of [Unite] members voted: of those, 241 people voted to strike. This represents 14% of our total staff yet the decision to strike will be felt across the entire charity.

St Mungo’s priority now is to minimise the impact of Unite’s strike on our most vulnerable clients.

But the “impact” of Unite’s decision on its “most vulnerable clients” seems disingenuous. As St Mungo’s has not always been concerned with those same “clients”.

Not the first controversy

As the Guardian reported:

St Mungo’s worked with Home Office patrols when they went out on the streets in search of rough sleepers deemed to be in the UK illegally to arrest and deport.

At the time St Mungo’s denied that it passed on either the locations where rough sleepers bedded down or personal information about them to Home Office enforcement teams without their consent. Some of the rough sleepers who were identified on immigration enforcement patrols were subsequently forcibly removed from the UK. Some of these removals have now been found to be unlawful and the Home Office is paying compensation.

The charity apologised afterwards. But as the Public Interest Law Centre noted, the “damage done in terms of trust may well be irreparable”.

Talks between Unite and St Mungo’s are ongoing. But it seems that the charity is trying to gain support by using the homeless people it supports as pawns. Just because workers are employed by a charity, it doesn’t mean that organisation can abuse their goodwill. And with St Mungo’s less-than-pious track record, it may well wish to reconsider its position in relation to Unite.

Featured image via Unite the Union 

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. True. About six months ago I had a few quid credit on my phone so I gave £3 of it to a TV appeal to feed a Syrian child. Maybe a week later I got a phone-drive call from the charity about giving more. Then maybe a few days later I got a second call. I gave the money to send food to Syria not to spend on pestering me with phone calls, so I won’t be doing that again for any TV appeal to donate by phone.

      If they do that on just £3 imagine what pestering a decent contribution would get you.

    2. I no longer contribute to charities who abuse the forced labour of Workfare macht Frei. One of them is Sue Ryder charity shops. There are internet sites which list these charities, High Street shops and even councils who do it.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.