Left-wing MPs put Starmer’s weak response to the Cummings scandal to shame
The scandal over Boris Johnson’s chief adviser Dominic Cummings allegedly breaking coronavirus (Covid-19) lockdown rules has sparked widespread anger. Over 50% of people now reportedly think he should step down. But that’s something Labour leader Keir Starmer seems unhappy to demand.
The comments of left-wing Labour MPs, meanwhile, have shown a much better understanding of what people around the country want right now.
‘Breaking the law’
Back in April, the official 10 Downing Street Twitter account said:
Follow the rules. They are there for a reason. #StayHomeSaveLives pic.twitter.com/Wzk3NVj1vN
— UK Prime Minister (@10DowningStreet) April 19, 2020
Cummings, however, now stands accused of ‘breaking the rules‘. And so far, Boris Johnson and other key government figures have rallied to defend him. Cummings has denied wrongdoing and denied breaking the rules a second time. But even some Conservative backbenchers think it’s time for him to go; as do some 41% of Tory voters.
The official opposition stance, though, has seemingly been to demand an ‘explanation‘ rather than a resignation or dismissal. And key members of Starmer’s shadow cabinet have duly avoided openly calling for Cummings to go. In fact, at least one shadow cabinet member actually criticised a protest outside Cummings’s house that highlighted why him flouting the rules was so unacceptable.
Labour’s official posture comes despite around 66% of Labour voters reportedly thinking Cummings should step down. And as one commentator put it, he “is 100% safe” until this position changes; because “no PM will sack his own advisor as long the opposition refuse to call for him to go”.
Labour left-wingers step in to lead
Left-wing Labour MPs, on the other hand, showed real leadership over the Cummings scandal:
We always suspected Dominic Cummings would be a liability for Johnson but after watching #DailyBriefing it’s obvious to even the most loyal Johnson supporter in the Cabinet that Cummings has to go. If he doesn’t it will leave Johnson looking both weak & incompetent.
— John McDonnell (@johnmcdonnellMP) May 23, 2020
So @SophyRidgeSky asks the key question “Is saving the job of Dominic Cummings more important than getting people to abide by the lockdown?” #cummingsmustgo
— Diane Abbott (@HackneyAbbott) May 24, 2020
Cummings should have no opportunity to resign.
Like my great comrade Dennis Skinner used to say,
He should be “ booted out like a dog in the night”
— Ian Lavery (@IanLaveryMP) May 23, 2020
If Boris Johnson doesn’t sack Cummings, his message to the country is “one rule for the elite, another for you”. https://t.co/8t7YHoGf1O
— Nadia Whittome MP (@NadiaWhittomeMP) May 22, 2020
Dominic Cummings must resign. Any outcome to this scandal other than Cummings out would be a betrayal of every key worker in this country and every victim of this virus. My full statement: pic.twitter.com/JHQjBaeLYj
— Mick Whitley (@MickWhitleyMP) May 24, 2020
I have been contacted by many constituents who are fearful for self-isolating family members that they can’t be with. The actions of Dominic Cummings is a spit in the face of their heartbreak. He is not fit to hold any post within government. https://t.co/l9ifOMgqCe
— Kim Johnson (@KimJohnsonMP) May 24, 2020
As the Network for Police Monitoring noted, the government’s ‘one rule for Cummings, another for everyone else’ message has clear repercussions:
Thanks for the clarification. Does this mean your government is cancelling all 14000 lockdown fines this week? https://t.co/zGkKhsYARx
— Netpol (@netpol) May 24, 2020
And as the Secret Barrister highlighted, Johnson’s defence of Cummings has implications for anyone charged with breaking coronavirus rules:
Any defence lawyer in court this week now has it from the very top of government: If your client is following “instinct” in breaching the Regulations, the Regulations do not apply, and no prosecution should follow.
— The Secret Barrister (@BarristerSecret) May 24, 2020
Socialist Campaign Group secretary Richard Burgon, meanwhile, was particularly vocal, insisting:
Here's what Boris Johnson should do today to restore public confidence in his own lockdown policies.
1. Sack Dominic Cummings
2. Restate that for public safety the lockdown rules must be adhered to at all times
3. Announce that any minister undermining them will be sacked
— Richard Burgon MP (@RichardBurgon) May 24, 2020
Demand better
The UK has suffered potentially 60,000+ excess deaths linked to coronavirus. And the government’s approach to the crisis has received significant criticism. The Cummings scandal, meanwhile, has made government messaging even more confusing than it already was.
As Labour left-winger Claudia Webbe stressed:
Its very clear public have lost confidence in Govt’s message. Boris Johnson must act quickly to protect lives, otherwise more people will die, in disproportionate numbers, rate of infection will go up. Families will continue to suffer. Dominic Cummings should not be the story
— Claudia Webbe (@ClaudiaWebbe) May 24, 2020
Its not right for Dominic Cummings a key advisor to Boris Johnson to flout #Coronavirus rules set by the Govt itself.
Throughout #COVIDー19 outbreak, many have died; are infected; are living in poverty, are facing inequality, are missing their families, this should be our focus
— Claudia Webbe (@ClaudiaWebbe) May 24, 2020
Government support for Cummings has seriously damaged public trust in its message. And amid a crisis that has already devastated so many lives, further confusion is utterly unacceptable. We all deserve so much better – and we need to start demanding it.
Featured image via Guardian News/YouTube and Independent/YouTube
Comments 21
Leave a Reply
The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX
Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.
For guest posting, contact [email protected]
For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]
© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings
I’m surprised Angela Rayner has said nowt. I believe she self-isolated in her OWN bedroom whilst her family stayed downstairs.
As for MiLord Flipperty-Flop. He’s still figuring out how to say he broke the rules/he didn’t break the rules in the same sentence.
Part-time PM and part-time Oppo.
I have no idea why so many people are so surprised that the psychopathic puppeteer behind the PM is apparently above the law. 1. He can’t care – none of it applies to him; he’s a psychopath.
2. Ruling class privileges, innit.
3. Poor people, disabled people, sick people, old people, people with additional needs…are all much cheaper dead. They tried starving them, but it was unreliable and slow. Then a plague happened to do the job for them. They do care, then, on that level; they’re experiencing it as “delight”.. >sigh<
I worked it out early on why they were seeding care homes with infected residents.
10,000 dead oldies save the Treasury up to £7.5m per annum in state pension pay outs.
Now they are after trying out their savings plan on child benefits.
Sorry. I meant £75m in savings.
It’s over 20,000 dead in care homes…….the Tories (the Party of Death) weren’t counting deceased for over a month, and remember death certificates are being fiddled….that another scandal.
No ifs no buts he must go.
If anyone has a habit of lying it’s him and his sidekick prince Boris.
Taking a 4 yr old child on a 2
Taking a 4. Yr old on a 250 mile trip in a car with 2 people carrying a deadly virus is not “instinct” its just plain stupid and dangerous. Any person with an ounce of common sense can see that there is something very wrong going on here.
Just saw Starmer’s response to the Cummings incident. Hardly weak.
A peevish and feeble article.
What is it about failing to call for Cummings’ resignation that’s beyond your comprehension? Until he does so, it is Starmer’s response that is peevish and feeble, along with your comment.
If only St. Jeremy the Pious, Patron Saint of the Working Class was still leader?
If he was, the Labour Party would have 1 more member than now
What people don’t seem to understand is that Corbyn stood for change “for the many not the few” whilst Starmer is business as usual back to capitalism stealing from the poor, establishment. For evidence just compare the treatment of the 2 by MSM hacks.
No one cares about boring old Jezzer anymore. Yesterday’s news. Move on.
What else do we expect from Blue Labour……..?
I suspect you describe anyone who disagrees with you as a Tory or a fascist. Infantile politics.
Blue Labour = anyone who dares to disagree with my narrow minded puritanical boorish extremist views.
Blue Labour = blairite politics and look how good that was, although I doubt the 3,000,000 Iraq civilians that died as a direct result of the US and U.K. illegal war would agree.
Corbyn offered a different way which would have made a difference and if you want evidence that the establishment was behind the way he was treated just look at the BBC panarama episode which was put over as fact but in reality was pure fiction. 3 panarama programs derided Corbyn none for May or her cronies. Look at the MSM in this country which just cuts and paste from Tory press briefings straight to the front page. Blue Labour or blue Tories ? Answer NONE
Are older royals in longterm lockdown as well like the rest of the UK’s vulnerable shielded oldies?
I think so. But Jeremy thinks the advice only applies to all the other over 70s.
The Secret Barrister has the answer I like. All fines be cancelled.
Breaking the rule is breaking the law??
When in doubt pretend the rule is a law which it isn’t.
Scary police.
Forget about ordinary people being considerate, sensible, and safe on their own with this pandemic.
Don’t trust them for a minute to do what’s right. Use fear to keep them in line. Intimidate!
Only Cummings Class can be trusted?
Sack Dominic “It’s in the trees! It’s..” Cummings now!
It seems the MI5 plant Starmer is showing his true deep state colours early. The Labour Party need to flush the deep state membership out and get on top of representing the middle and low income people rather than the ‘self entitled’ wealthy people. As an affluent lawyer Starmer has conflicted interests. In fact he would be a better leader of the Tory party than the fat head they have now.