BBC staff might be banned from attending Pride events and ‘virtue signalling’ because of confusing new rules on staff conduct. People are now asking if this means that the red poppy will also be outlawed by the channel.
BBC director general Tim Davie reportedly introduced the guidance on 29 October. It appears to suggest that attending major LGBTQI+ events like Pride and anti-racism protests like Black Lives Matter could damage impartiality.
Emojis in tweets should also be avoided, and stories should be broken through official channels rather than personal accounts, according to the new code.
In an email obtained by Press Gazette, Davis said:
Trust is the foundation of the BBC’s relationship with the public. How employees of the BBC conduct themselves is vital to maintaining trust. The materials published today will help ensure employees uphold and protect the highest standards of BBC impartiality and maintain the trust audiences expect, demand and deserve.
The new BBC guidelines state:
Following social media accounts which reflect only one point of view on matters of public policy, politics or ‘controversial subjects’ may create a similar impression
Press Gazette reported that rules allowing the wearing of a red poppy for Remembrance Day, however, would remain. But there was no explanation for how that squared with the new rule about ‘politics’ and ‘controversial subjects’.
The red poppy is seen as controversial by some, including those from Irish Republican backgrounds who reject British rule.
One Twitter user pointed out that the Poppy Appeal could easily be included in the new definition:
According to these BBC guidelines, employees can no longer support Children in Need, Sports Relief, Comic Relief or the Poppy Appeal. pic.twitter.com/JNZGW8FJI5
— Otto English (@Otto_English) October 30, 2020
Another asked why the poppy got a “free pass”:
Is the wearing of a poppy by BBC journalists 'virtue signalling' under Tim Davie's new guidelines? I have no problem with poppies, but it's not entirely clear why the poppy "campaign" gets a free pass, while supporting other causes puts staff in danger of being sacked.
— Neil Morrow (@mrneilmorrow) October 29, 2020
Others asked what the response might be if the issue was raised:
“The poppy has been worn by BBC journalists for decades as a symbol of remembrance, and is not intended to denote any political statement. As such it does not fall within the new BBC guidelines”
Or some other mealy mouthed bullshit.
— Jack (@Mr_Fitzgerald) October 29, 2020
Wearing a white poppy might be a good test, one Twitter user said:
there's an interesting test case: is wearing a white poppy allowed?
— Ian Rennie (@theangelremiel) October 29, 2020
The new rules, then, seem more like the opinion of a BBC boss. So much for impartiality.
Featured image via Wikimedia Commons
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?