Labour MPs fell apart live on TV defending Hartlepool chaos

Jon Ashworth and Lisa Nandy discussing Hartlepool candidate Paul Williams
Support us and go ad-free

Members of Labour’s shadow cabinet rallied to defend the situation with the Hartlepool by-election on Sunday 21 March. If there was ever a case of flogging a dead horse, this was it. Because despite a growing scandal over the party’s candidate, senior Labour figures spent the morning firefighting live on TV.

Hartlepool hits headlines

The Canary previously reported that there’s a by-election coming up in Hartlepool. The previous Labour MP Mike Hill quit on 16 March. We wrote that:

Hill’s resignation follows reports that he used taxpayers’ money to fight a staff member’s claim of unfair dismissal, sexual assault, and harassment. According to the Sunday Times, he claimed £2,000 on parliamentary expenses for the excess on his employment liability policy.

So Labour needed a new candidate. Enter Dr Paul Williams, ex-MP for Stockton South. But his candidacy has already been contentious. As SKWAWKBOX reported, some of Williams’ Twitter output has been dodgy to say the least. Tweets included talking about “Tory MILFs”, praising the Saudi Arabian regime, expressing pro-war and what could be seen as Islamophobic views, and as SKWAWKBOX noted:

Williams retweeted a call on the party to stand down in ten seats to allow Lib Dems a better chance of success

But the way Labour selected Williams has also caused anger.

One for all?

This is because the party put him in place without a full selection process. As SKWAWKBOX wrote, Labour:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

imposed [him] without giving members a chance to vote on who they wanted to represent them, despite misgivings about his local knowledge

In short, there was a shortlist of one: Williams. You’d be forgiven for thinking we’re back to the ‘good old days’ of Tony Blair parachuting candidates into seats. So, with a storm brewing around Williams, senior Labour figures had to go on the defensive on Sunday morning TV. It didn’t end well.

Anywhere but Hartlepool

First up was shadow health secretary Jonathan Ashworth. On Sophy Ridge On Sunday, the host pushed Ashworth on Hartlepool’s “all-male, all-white shortlist of one”. Ashworth said:

Well, we’re still committed to all-women shortlists and improving the representation of women in parliament. We’ve actually got more than 50%, I think, of women in the Parliamentary Labour Party because of all-women shortlists. And we’re very proud of that and we will continue to use all-women shortlists in parliamentary selections and future by-election selections.

Ridge said what many were probably thinking:

Just not this one?

Ashworth washed his hands of the situation, saying he wasn’t involved:

So the shadow health secretary had no explanation for the one-person Hartlepool shortlist. Would Lisa Nandy fair any better on the Andrew Marr Show? Obviously not.

Whataboutery

The shadow foreign secretary was probed by Marr on Hartlepool, too. He asked her about Williams’ “MILFs” tweet. Marr asked if Nandy agreed with Shami Chakrabarti who said Williams’ tweet was “completely unacceptable misogynistic abuse” and that Labour should remove him. Nandy said:

I absolutely agree… that it is completely and utterly unacceptable. He was right to apologise. And if he hadn’t apologised, frankly, we’d be having a very different conversation

Marr pushed again. He asked Nandy:

So it’s fine to be a misogynist, as long as you apologise?

Nandy’s response?

No, I don’t think it’s fine to be a misogynist at all. But I think you need to recognise, Andrew, that we’re in a place where a lot of people have got this wrong in the past.

The purge: election year

If Williams is genuinely sorry for his tweets, fine. And if he has learned from his mistakes, that’s also fine.

What isn’t fine is the way Labour installed him as the Hartlepool candidate. It’s against a backdrop of an ongoing purge of left-wing members of the party.

Moreover, Labour’s majority in Hartlepool was already slim at the 2019 election. But the leadership seems to have learned nothing – because Williams is clearly pro-EU, whereas people in Hartlepool voted by nearly 70% for Brexit. And with the Northern Independence Party looking like a “cause for concern” for Labour, the party may have just handed the seat to the Tories before campaigning even begins.

Featured image via Sky News – YouTube, BBC iPlayer and Chris McAndrew – Wikimedia 

Support us and go ad-free

Fund our Investigations Unit

You can help us investigate corruption, expose injustice and uncover the truth.

As one of the only independent investigations units in the country, we work for you – but we need your help to keep going. We need to raise £10,000 to continue our groundbreaking investigations. Can you chip in?

The Canary Fund us
  • Show Comments
    1. So … Labour believe that apologies wipe the shate clean. Erm …. but then they don’t …. or do they? …. And apparently (according to “£250 ear-buds” Raynher) Labour are coming from a very lo9w point. That’s a low point where they won more votes in both 2017 and 2019 than they did in 2005, 2010 and 2015 ….. so not as low as pre Corbyn then?

      And of course at that “low point” they WON Hartlepool, but now they’re getting in their excuses for losing it.”

      I think perhaps maths and logic are no more the NuNuLabour Party’s strong set any more than policies or principles are.

    2. Simple math: Corbyn effectively doubled the Labour vote, with his personal charmisma, honesty, and decency. Around 45-50% of actual voters voted for him in 2019, minus all the postal-ballot stuffing by the Tories and the brexshit Camp.

      Which means the genuine Tory vote is around 35%.

      So, Starmer is throwing – wrong tense – has THROWN AWAY around 20-25% of the electorate, in order to ‘win’ at most 10-12% of Tories who may jump ship from this psycho govt.

      More importantly to him though – he is gaining the support of Murdoch and other offshored media oligarchs.

      Serious question: How many socialists have to be purged, before the Labour Party is no longer considered Socialist?

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.