Met Police use the Tories’ draconian new anti-protest laws for a show of force during the coronation

Anti-monarchist protesters hold signs saying 'Not My King' in the run-up to the Met Police enforcing new anti-protest laws Met Police Protest


Support us and go ad-free

The Metropolitan Police were out in force during the coronation of Charles Windsor on Saturday 6 May. During the run-up, they boasted of plans to deploy 11,500 officers into London. However, the event was overshadowed by the Met’s zealous use of new anti-protest laws.

#NotMyKing

Republic is a UK-based group that wants “to see the monarchy abolished” and replaced by an elected head of state. The organisation was set up in 1983 and formalised in 2006. Charles’ coronation over the weekend gave the group a prime opportunity to get its message across. It started a campaign under the banner of #NotMyKing, and planned to protest during the coronation itself. The Met Police, however, had other ideas.

At 7.28am on 6 May, before the coronation had even begun, the Alliance of European Republican Movements posted a video to Twitter showing police arresting Republic members:

Related articles

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

A few minutes later, Labour for a Republic shared a photo of Met Police officers searching a van full of Not My King placards:

The Guardian later reported that:

Graham Smith, the chief executive of Republic, had been collecting drinks and placards for demonstrators at the main site of the protest on Trafalgar Square… when he was stopped along with five others by police on nearby St Martin’s Lane.

The group had been walking behind a rental van containing hundreds of placards when they were approached by the police and searched.

This took place despite “meetings and agreements” between Republic and the Met Police, according to the anti-monarchist group.

The Met Police claimed they had arrested the six due to suspicions over “lock on devices”:

Lock-ons are typically performed with items that require some work to undo. This could mean anything from bike locks to barrels filled with concrete. However, Republic’s head – Graham Smith – tweeted that the group made it clear to police at the time that the “devices” were in fact luggage straps:

The police released the first Republic protester nearly 16 hours after their arrest. The group posted that all were released at 3pm on 7 May, and the Met Police said it had released all six with no further action.

Met Police arrest council volunteers

That wasn’t the whole of the Met Police’s rampage though. It turned out that officers had arrested three people at around 2am on Saturday morning for carrying rape alarms. All three were volunteers for the Westminster City Council’s Night Stars public safety team. They hand them out to women on London’s streets at night.

Journalist Mic Wright, who first reported the arrests, showed the results of officers’ rough treatment of volunteer Riz Choudry:

The Met Police told ITV News that they had “received intelligence” people were going to use rape alarms to disrupt the coronation. This came after the Mail on Sunday published similar claims in the lead-up to the event. Wright said the source of the Mail‘s story was the Met Police itself, whose head of press is a former Daily Mail journalist. As a result, Wright told BBC Radio 5 Live:

the police put in place the means to arrest people ahead of time by placing this in a friendly media outlet

However, it’s questionable whether the police needed to manufacture an excuse.

Laws rushed in for the coronation

The Independent‘s Lizzie Dearden shared a full breakdown of Met Police arrests on Saturday:

It revealed that a majority of those the police took in were from high-profile protest and direct action groups. In addition to the six from Republic, the police also arrested 13 people connected to Just Stop Oil, and 14 from Animal Rising (formerly Animal Rebellion). Dearden highlighted that many of these arrests were made using powers granted by two significant anti-protest laws drafted in by the Tories.

The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 created laws against so-called ‘public nuisance’. The law was then bolstered by the Public Order Act 2023, which parliament rushed through in order to deal with protesters during the coronation. Amongst the new powers, it makes locking-on illegal and extends stop and search powers in relation to items used for locking-on.

No justice, just us

Despite widespread opposition to both bills, they are now entrenched in UK law. And although they were championed by the Tories, Labour has steadfastly refused to condemn their implementation. On 8 May, two days after the coronation debacle, Huff Post reported that Labour shadow health minister Andrew Gwynne said the party would “look very carefully” at the Public Order Act if it got into power. When challenged that looking at doesn’t mean taking action, Gwynne backed away from the subject.

While the amount of public backlash the Met Police has faced for its actions over the weekend is probably a good thing, it masks another ugly truth about British society. Images of officers arresting white, relatively affluent people have stirred up strong sentiments in people. Yet when police officers engage in similar actions against ethnic minorities, it usually passes by with little public outrage. Had the six arrested been Black and Brown youth not affiliated with ‘respectable’ organisations, the public discourse about the coronation would likely be very different.

The last few years have seen the Tories rapidly passing laws to quash public dissent. The actions of the Met Police during the coronation have exposed just the tip of the dizzying depths to which these laws will drag us. And with no effective parliamentary opposition to the Tories’ hostile environment, our responsibility is to support one another in the face of spreading authoritarianism.

Featured image via The Guardian/YouTube

Support us and go ad-free

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us
  • Show Comments

    1. “The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 created laws against so-called ‘public nuisance’. The law was then bolstered by the Public Order Act 2023”

      Both having received “royal assent”, of course.

      Incidentally, there was anti-monarchy protests in places other than London you know…

      Newcastle, for instance : https://youtu.be/OxBOaYBI1M0

      Report comment

    2. Labour, the alleged opposition party, has expressed its full support for the Public Order Act. Interviewed about the arrests, Shadow Foreign secretary David Lammy was asked if Labour would scrap the anti-protest legislation. He answered that Labour “can’t come into office, picking through all the conservative legislation and repealing it.”

      Shadow Communities Secretary Lisa Nandy commented, “It’s not clear in this case whether the problem is with the legislation, or whether the problem is more operational and a matter for the police.” Shadow Public Health Minister Andrew Gwynne said, “We need to see how it’s working. And if it’s not working in the way the government say it’s intended to work then that’s something that needs addressing.”

      Labour has banned its local party organisations from affiliating to the democracy group Republic. So, for the tens of millions of Brits opposed to this legislation and/or to the monarchy, for whom do we cast our votes in this supposed democracy when it comes to picking a government?

      Report comment

    3. One of the reasons the Tories supported Brexit. If you think things are bad now, just wait till they withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights, which they’re discussing in relation to deporting asylum seekers to Rwanda.

      Report comment

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.

Related articles