Hold onto your hats folks, because we may have reached peak Telegraph. The conservative publication featured a column this week entitled: ‘Thanks to Theresa May, we’re free to shop at Waitrose without apologising for it.’
The 25 July column by Rowan Pelling rejoices that Theresa May was photographed doing her weekly shop in Waitrose, rather than roughing it in Asda with the rest of the plebs.
One of the good points it makes, is that it’s refreshing to see a prime minister avoid the ham-fisted attempts at ‘I am just like you’ that saw Eton-educated, trust fund heir David Cameron fly EasyJet, and buy his millionaire wife Samantha a secondhand Nissan.
David Cameron buys used Nissan Micra for wife Samantha – in blue https://t.co/sHW9N76KCD
— The Guardian (@guardian) May 23, 2016
However, the piece moves on to celebrate some sort of resurgence of middle class entitlement – a celebration of no longer feeling the guilt attached to privilege in a time of great want and deprivation. Pelling writes:
Most MPs consider Waitrose’s well-heeled demographic makes it a no-go zone for anyone striving to be prosier than thou: a new report from Lloyds bank even suggests that living near a Waitrose adds £40,000 to the value of your house.
Better to be seen shopping somewhere more humble: David Cameron was often snapped buying his groceries at the relatively egalitarian Sainsbury’s in Chipping Norton, even though the Camerons filled the fridge in Downing Street with Waitrose goodies delivered by Ocado.
Our new PM has no such qualms.
Who hasn’t stood in front of a Waitrose freezer and gazed longingly at the Tanzanian Chocolate ice cream with Blood Orange Sorbet? Or felt their life is incomplete without Crisp & Zingy Mojito Chicken Cigarellos?
Part of the pleasure of the Waitrose experience is tracking down an item you’re sure no consumer group in the history of shopping has ever really needed, never mind demanded, and then succumbing to the overwhelming urge to purchase it: double-yolked eggs, anybody?
A friend of mine practically expired with excitement when she found the Cambridge branch had started selling Chelsea Confectioner Rococo’s exquisitely expensive bespoke English Chocolates.
Fantastic for Theresa, and we’re sure everyone is thrilled that Middle England can now feel free to gorge itself silly on Samphire Beignets without those annoying reminders that 3.9m children in the UK are living in poverty. What a relief.
Of course, the piece does overlook a few items about the May premiership which could be a cause for concern.
- She never rebelled against Cameron’s government. This means she has supported austerity, which has hit deprived communities and women the hardest.
- She has consistently opposed the Human Rights Act and the European Convention on Human Rights.
- As Home Secretary, she was an authoritarian figure who championed greater surveillance powers which have led to the UK being described as a “surveillance state”. She has also been pushing the much-criticised and draconian “extremism bill”, based on a definition of extremism that effectively outlaws dissent.
- She has announced that she’s determined to renew the Trident nuclear programme – estimated to cost somewhere between £31bn and £100bn. Will this come at the expense of education, healthcare, and affordable homes?
- She has a patchy history on LGBT rights – having previously voted against equalising the age of consent and against gay people adopting children.
- May dropped a bombshell series of announcements before jetting off for her Summer holidays which signals that this may be the most authoritarian, socially-conservative government Britain has had for decades.
But don’t worry. Middle England will be kept safe from the madness, able to sit out the chaos in the luxury of their nearest Waitrose, while the rest of the country goes up in smoke.
Image via Tom Donnelly/Youtube
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?