Three more reasons to sign the petition to ‘sack Toby Young’

https://www.flickr.com/photos/22051789@N04/6924748432/
Support us and go ad-free

On 1 January Toby Young was appointed to the board of the Office for Students (OfS), a newly formed university watchdog to regulate Higher Education (HE). As The Canary previously reported, Young’s appointment has caused widespread controversy. But criticism of Young’s views has prompted over 160,000 people to sign a petition demanding he is sacked. And, given the criteria listed in the job application for this post, people have good reason to question whether he is fit for office. Because Young’s ‘comments‘ seem at odds with (at least) three requirements of the post.

1. Integrity?

The essential criteria for this post state [pdf, p9] that candidates should demonstrate:

good judgement and high levels of integrity.

In response to claims he was “unfit” for the post because of “politically incorrect things I’ve said in the past”, Young said he was “a supporter of women’s rights and LGBT rights.” And in his Spectator column, Young claimed he is victim to “attacks” from a “twitchfork mob”.

But he then went on to mention his “unsuccessful efforts to pick up a ‘lipstick lesbian’ by dressing as a woman”.

Despite this, he still  claimed “actual objections” to his appointment were “feeble”. But his claims that comments were made “20 years ago” fail to mention “sexist” tweets in recent years.

All this, perhaps, goes some way to explain why his appointment has led some to question Young’s integrity.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Labour has demanded that Young is removed on the basis of what it called historical “homophobia and misogyny”. And further concerns prompted Labour MP Roberta Blackman-Woods to write to Universities Minister Jo Johnson asking for more information about Young’s appointment:

On 4 January she went further, and asked for full disclosure about all appointments made to the OfS.

Blackman-Woods told The Canary it is vital that any appointments made to the OfS “are from people who demonstrate high levels of integrity and public confidence”. She went on to say:

I can’t see how he [Young] could meet the criteria in the job description and person specification.

2. Principles?

In this role Young has also agreed to uphold [pdf, p15] the “seven principles of public life”. In a letter to Theresa May, Labour MPs Angela Rayner and Dawn Butler said:

Mr Young’s long history of misogyny and homophobia make a mockery of these guidelines

The Evening Standard has also revealed that Young has “mocked the idea” that pornographic films “were degrading to women”. Butler, shadow minister for women and equalities said:

the message Theresa May is sending to students is that under the Tories, misogyny and homophobia will not just be tolerated but rewarded.

Since his appointment, it has been widely reported that Young deletedthousands” of tweets. Although one of the ‘seven principles’ is “openness”, Young has not made any official announcement to explain why he deleted these.

3. Challenge poor behaviour?

The job description also makes it clear [pdf, p15] that those appointed should “be willing to challenge poor behaviour wherever it occurs”.

But this poses a serious question. How do Young’s views – promoted in a public forum – uphold the principles behind education for young people? There are strong codes of practice for teachers and lecturers. The University and College Union has challenged Young’s appointment. And the National Education Union has written to education secretary Justine Greening, criticising Young’s “sexist and homophobic behaviour”.

‘An important body’

Speaking to The Canary, Blackman-Woods said:

The OfS is an extremely important body in terms of the regulation, oversight and ensuring the quality of Higher Education in the UK. It is therefore essential that the government take great care in the appointments to the board of the OfS.

But the Department for Education (DfE) defended Young’s appointment. A DfE spokesperson told The Canary:

Public appointments, including to the Office for Students (OfS), are made in line with the Code of Governance for Public Appointments.

The Canary contacted Young for comment but received no reply by the time of publication. He has posted a Twitter thread responding to the criticisms, and apologised for his comments.

Fit for office?

There is already a crisis in HE as student debt soars, and morale plummets for University lecturers. The appointment of Young, and other business ‘leaders’, to the OfS has caused [paywall] further concerns. But Young’s views challenge three areas that are vital for such a significant position.

Is Young fit for office? Thousands think not, and demand he is sacked.

Get Involved!

Sign the petition asking for Toby Young to be sacked.

Featured image via Flickr

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed