The press watchdog has refused to investigate a complaint about the Daily Mail’s ‘wreathgate’ story

Daily Mail logo
Support us and go ad-free

Correction: The headline of this article was updated at 9.20am on 25 August to make clear that IPSO refused to investigate the complaint, rather than dismissing it. The headline previously stated “The press watchdog has dismissed a complaint about the Daily Mail’s ‘wreathgate’ story”. The article itself has not been changed.

Press watchdog the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) has refused to investigate a complaint over the Daily Mail‘s first so-called ‘wreathgate’ story about Jeremy Corbyn.

The Daily Mail and ‘wreathgate’

Writer Alex Tiffin submitted a formal complaint to the IPSO about the Daily Mail‘s story. The paper, with pictures, accused Labour leader Corbyn of “holding [a] wreath”:

feet from the graves of terror leaders linked to the Munich Massacre…

The picture was among a number taken during a service to honour Palestinian ‘martyrs’.

Buried in the cemetery in Tunisia are members of Black September, the terror group which massacred 11 Israeli athletes at the 1972 Olympics…

One picture places Mr Corbyn close to the grave of another terrorist, Atef Bseiso, intelligence chief of the Palestine Liberation Organisation.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

A complaint

But Tiffin disputed the Daily Mail‘s story. He wrote to IPSO saying the Daily Mail:

had breached Clause 1 of the Editors Code. Clause 1 relates the accuracy of information being presented to the reader.

I went on to say that the use of “Munich terrorists” by the paper is highly misleading. I directed them to several examples proving that the men buried in Tunis are not any of the attackers that took part in the Munich atrocity in 1972. Those terrorists as I wrote last week are buried hundreds of miles away in Libya.

I then went on to add that the men buried in Tunis have been alleged to have been behind the plot but apart from Israel’s claims, this has never been proven.

Channel 4‘s FactCheck website analysed the story. Its verdict was inconclusive, but it raised some points similar to Tiffin’s.

IPSO says… 

Now, in a response to Tiffin, which he passed to The Canary, IPSO has refused to investigate his complaint. It says:

In the case of third party complaints, we do need to consider the position of the party most closely involved. In this case, the Executive took the view that the alleged inaccuracies related directly to the alleged ‘Munich terrorists’ and their families. We considered it would not be possible or appropriate to investigate and publicly rule on who was involved in the 1972 attacks on Israeli athletes in Munich and where they are buried, without the direct involvement of the families of the alleged attackers, and those with first-hand knowledge of the attacks.

Furthermore, an IPSO investigation and public ruling could have a significant effect on the families of these alleged attackers, and we are concerned about making such a ruling, without their involvement in our investigation as complainants, and without their consent. Taking into account the nature of the alleged inaccuracy, and the position of these families, we decided it would not be appropriate to consider your complaint further.

Further to this, IPSO told The Canary:

IPSO is investigating complaints under Clause (1) Accuracy of the Editors’ Code about the following articles:


The Times Corbyn: I did attend wreath ceremony for Munich killers


The Daily Telegraph Corbyn salute associated with Islamist terror group

The Daily Mail Hate-filled curtain-raiser for Corbyn’s wreath tribute

Daily Express Riddle of who paid for Corbyn trip that ‘honoured terrorists’

These complaints have been made by the Labour Party on behalf of Jeremy Corbyn MP, the subject of the article.

IPSO also received a number of other complaints about the same coverage. Complainants have been informed that we are taking forward The Labour Party’s complaints.

It has written a blog about third party complaints which you can read here.

Tiffin says… 

The Daily Mail article IPSO is investigating is not the one Tiffin complained about. He told The Canary:

IPSO may have stated they are investigating the Labour Party’s complaint but their failure to investigate the article that started the whole ‘wreathgate’ debacle shows that media accountability in this country is dead.

This is one of the most important complaints they’ve had in recent times and their inaction shows we need a change in how the media is held to account.

Tiffin told The Canary he will be appealing IPSO’s decision because:

If they’re not investigating the original article anything else is lip service.

Featured image via the Palestinian Ambassador in Tunisia – Facebook and Alex Tiffin – screengrab

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed