Rutnam’s departure has worsened ‘Westminster storm’ around Priti Patel, but she’s no stranger to controversy

Priti Patel


Support us and go ad-free

Philip Rutnam has resigned from his post as permanent secretary. His departure comes after a series of clashes with home secretary Priti Patel.

Rutnam has alleged Patel belittled colleagues and led a “vicious and orchestrated” briefing campaign against him. In the wake of his resignation, the Westminster storm surrounding Patel has intensified. And Patel is said to be “absolutely livid” about allegations that she bullied staff and is distrusted by spymasters.

Unofficial meetings

But Patel is certainly no stranger to controversy. Her return to Government as home secretary in 2019, when Boris Johnson became prime minister, raised eyebrows. This is because in 2017, Patel was forced to quit Theresa May’s cabinet after having a series of unofficial meetings with the Israeli government.

Priti Patel and Boris JohnsonPriti Patel returned to Government as Home Secretary when Boris Johnson became Prime Minister in 2019 (Kirsty Wigglesworth/PA)

It emerged she had had a series of 12 meetings with senior Israeli figures, including the prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, while on holiday in August 2017. Patel was international development secretary at the time. She held two additional meetings, one in the UK and one in the US, following her return from Israel.

Patel is widely believed to harbour leadership ambitions. And some Westminster watchers regarded the “freelancing” meetings with the Israelis as part of a possible drive to boost her personal contacts and standing ahead of an eventual pitch for the top spot.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

When she resigned in 2017, she acknowledged that her actions “fell below the high standards” expected.

In a bizarre episode, thousands of people followed the progress of her plane as she returned from a trip to Kenya for the showdown with May which led to her exit from the government.

Dodgy views

Moreover, Patel’s appointment as international development secretary was greeted with concern by some in the aid community. They recalled that she had previously called for her new ministry to be replaced by a Department for International Trade and Development, with greater focus on boosting UK business opportunities in the developing world.

And in 2011, Patel’s views on the death penalty came to light. She used an appearance on Question Time to say she would “support the reintroduction of capital punishment to serve as a deterrent” to “murderers and rapists” who re-offend. Although in 2016, she told MPs that she did not support the death penalty.

So while this latest controversy is causing a stir, it certainly isn’t the first of its kind.

Support us and go ad-free

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us
  • Show Comments

    1. I wonder if over the next few days as more of this argument is aired we hear of anything this Home Office civil servant did or said that upset Israel and maybe that’s why she wanted him out? If so then maybe she is Israel’s Fifth Column in Downing Street in the way Jared Kushner is their Fifth Column in the White House.

      Report comment

    2. The Civil Service / Home Office and the Tories at loggerheads = Rats in a bag.

      Let’s not take sides with either. For a start the Civil Service / Home Office we all know is deeply and traditionally a conservative (small ‘c’) institution that had Labour and Mr Corbyn got into government the Civil Service / Home Office would have been very difficult to meld to a socialist operation. Isn’t the Civil Service / Home Office renowned to leak like a sieve? And, if conservative-types operating there disagree with policy don’t they upset the political applecart with leakages? One gets the impression top Civil Service-Home Office leaders, honoured with knighthoods as of some establishment right, swan about in their fiefdoms forgetting who they serve. These fiefdoms stuffed with unelected bureaucrats in ‘honoured places’ need to remember they’re there to do and facilitate sitting government’s agendas.

      Report comment

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.