The RSPB called out Gove’s new climate-wrecking plans – but quickly climbed down

Michael Gove and RSPB logo


Support us and go ad-free

The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) recently came out fast and furious against the government, describing members of its frontbench as “liars”. It was a surprising move for a usually publicly reserved organisation. However, it quickly retracted the statement – and some suspect the meddling of Tufton Street.

RSPB comes out swinging… for a moment

On 30 August, the RSPB took to social media to call prime minister Rishi Sunak, levelling up secretary Michael Gove, and environment secretary Therese Coffey “liars!”:

The statement came after the government U-turned on a pledge to protect nutrient neutrality. This EU-derived pledge meant housing developers must meet specific ecological standards for approval of their plans. Gove’s levelling up department said it would “boost” the UK economy.

However, environmental groups across the board were critical of the move. Doug Parr, policy director for Greenpeace UK, told the Independent that it signalled the government had “given up” on reducing sewage pollution into the country’s rivers. Meanwhile Craig Bennett, head of the Wildlife Trusts, told BBC News that it showed housebuilders had “yet again” dodged environmental accountability.

However, it was the RSPB that came out most angrily against the government, saying that it was now “patently clear” the government doesn’t care about nature:

The rest of its Twitter thread highlighted how the nutrient neutrality U-turn broke a long series of pledges made by the Sunak government.

People replied with praise for the RSPB’s stance. Some were even surprised at the statement – not because of how true it is, but because it came from the normally timid RSPB:

Just hours later, though, the RSPB issued a public climb-down.

Tufton Street?

Later that day, the RSPB put out another tweet apologising for its thread calling the government liars. It said that “frustration” had led it to attack Sunak, Gove, and Coffey, rather than “policy”:

This climb down was marked by two things, however. Firstly, the RSPB hasn’t deleted the original thread attacking the government’s U-turn. Secondly, the speed with which it came was notable. This second point led to speculation about why the charity issued its apology.

Many were quick to point at Ben Caldecott, an RSPB trustee with links to the Policy Exchange and other Tufton Street ‘thinktanks’:

‘Reverse ferret’

Caldecott had earlier criticised the RSPB’s “liars” statement, saying that it was “not an appropriate contribution to our public discourse”. Meanwhile, Tory MP Mark Jenkinson had publicly called for the Charity Commission to strip the RSPB of its charitable status as a result of its attack on the government.

This led some to speculate that Tufton Street had leaned on the charity following its criticism. Climate website DeSmog described 55 Tufton Street as:

a small but influential network of libertarian, pro-Brexit thinktanks and lobby groups, including the UK‘s principal climate science denial group, the Global Warming Policy Foundation.

Caldecott remains a senior fellow at Policy Exchange – of which Gove is a long-running supporter. Conservationist Miles King explicitly called out these links, describing the RSPB’s move as a “reverse ferret“: “a sudden reversal in an organization’s editorial or political line on a certain issue”. At the time of publishing, there’s no public evidence of these claims.

The RSPB is a genteel yet widely supported charity. The fact that even it had taken a public stance against the MPs behind climate-wrecking environmental policies shows just how far down the climate-breaking rabbit hole we really are now.

Featured image via Policy Exchange/Wikimedia Commons

Support us and go ad-free

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us

Related articles