An old BBC video adds a whole new level of horror to the Andrew Sabisky debacle

Andrew Sabisky
Tracy Keeling

By now, Andrew Sabisky’s views on eugenics and ‘race’ are well known. The Downing Street adviser, who is part of Dominic Cummings’s “misfits and weirdos” recruitment for Boris Johnson’s government, has made numerous appalling comments in the past on those subjects.

But Sabisky has also expressed views on other matters surrounding governance. In one old BBC video, for example, he shares his opinions on the elderly and military spending. His attitude towards these issues does nothing to dispel the fear that he’s completely unfit to be anywhere near government – including a Conservative one.

Spend, spend, spend

For many years now, the Conservatives have pegged themselves as a fiscally conservative party. Ex-PM David Cameron telling everyone the country has to ‘live within its means’ and torturing the public with years of vicious austerity is a testament to that.

Up against a Labour Party willing to invest in UK citizens and the planet’s health, Johnson has loosened the purse strings a bit (on paper, at least). But Sabisky’s views on public spending in the area of ‘defence’ turn the tables dramatically. If such ideas were implemented by the Conservatives, they would become the party of fiscal irresponsibility – not to mention a party of grotesque warmongering.

Speaking on BBC Daily Politics in 2017, Sabisky argued for military spending at 6% of GDP. He said:

I’m not saying we should spend 6% forever. But I think for maybe the next five years a really big boost, some big heavy equipment buying, and then maybe taper down towards a long term target of 4%. That’d be a good sensible policy.

The now Number 10 adviser said 6% military spending was necessary because the UK has “lost so much capability over the last few decades and particularly since 2010”. The UK currently commits to spending 2% or more of GDP. For comparison, the US – which is notorious for splashing lots of cash in this area – only commits to spending 2-3% of GDP on it. If the UK increased its military spending to 6%, it would be the second biggest spender in relation to the percentage of GDP on Earth. Only Saudi Arabia would top it.

Who’s paying for it?

On BBC Daily Politics, Sabisky also explained where he believes the extra funding for military spending should come from:

It would mean a few [cuts to other areas of public spending] but I think certain sacrifices may have to be made, particularly by the older generation who are currently recipients of extremely expensive pledges, such as the triple lock [on pensions], free NHS prescriptions and so on and so forth.

“The older generation” is a major part of the Conservatives’ voting base. So Sabisky’s proposal to axe the benefits they receive so the country can afford one of the highest military budgets in the world (as a percentage of GDP) risks alienating the party’s core supporters.

Whichever way you look at it, Sabisky appears entirely unsuitable to advise Number 10. Although it doesn’t seem that Johnson is planning to show him the door yet. That’s perhaps not surprising in light of the hideous views on ethnicity and other subjects the PM himself has previously expressed.

Featured image via BBC

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. O Dear! Andrew Sabisky has been cited too weird even for a Boris-Dominic Cummings Tory weirdo government. Let’s not kid ourselves though – because, there’s racist weirdo’s of high renown already well established in the annals and of estimable regard and oftentimes quoted in alumnae stuff of our British establishment’s learn-ed places and academic papers.

      For example Hans Eysenck, renowned top British psychologist, paranormal believer and promulgator of a recognised boffin’s science studying ‘genetic racial differences’ had he lived today, might have been co-opted into Boris’s and Dominic‘s government as ‘topmost weirdo’ to miraculously move Tory policies forward all done with his hands tied behind his back and balancing a crystal ball on the top of his bonce, if not his proboscis. Interesting how he worked closely with Cyril Burt another ‘top Brit. pyscho.’ who turned out to be a fraud.

      One doesn’t excuse Tory weirdo Mr Sabisky for the revelations of trawled-up past demeanours. But his issue does raise additional issues about insensitive intellectual and establishment racism enshrined in illustrious British academia. You only have to type into your browser Hans Eysenck and you’ll be presented with eye-watering Eysenck eye-openers all about his renowned research into racial intelligence differences.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.