Dominic Cummings’ luck may be about to run out as concerns of impropriety pile up

Dominic Cummings
Support us and go ad-free

Downing Street special adviser Dominic Cummings is facing fresh questions about possible impropriety. This regards a payment of more than a quarter of a million pounds he made to a company central to the pro-Brexit campaign. That company, Faculty, is now the recipient of government contracts worth millions.

Add these concerns to the other allegations raised against Cummings and we find a picture of someone whose very public role should without question be subject to official investigation.

Questions over payment

As Vote Leave director, Cummings played a pivotal role in the Brexit campaign. Indeed, he’s credited as having thought up the ‘£350 million a week for the NHS’ bus stunt. Faculty was previously called Advanced Skills Initiative (ASI) and under that name produced advertising for Vote Leave. Much of Vote Leave’s advertising was subsequently criticised as dishonest. Vote Leave was found to have breached spending limits in its campaign and subsequently fined £61,000 by the Electoral Commission.

The latest revelation claims that Cummings paid just over a quarter of a million pounds during 2018 and 2019 to Faculty. The money that Cummings paid to Faculty came from a company, Dynamic Maps, set up in October 2017 by Cummings and listed as a computer consultancy. Ben Warner, brother of Faculty co-founder and CEO Marc Warner, is now a data and technology adviser to 10 Downing Street. And there’s another Vote Leave connection: Paul Stephenson, who was its director of communications, co-founded the PR and communications firm Hanbury, a Faculty client. 

The unaudited financial statement for Dynamic Maps for the period ending 31 October 2018 confirms that as it is a small business the company is not required to have its accounts audited. But as Cummings is a public figure it would be right that he explain what the £260,000 paid to Faculty was for and where that money came from. However, a clue to this might be found in an October 2019 article by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism. It reported that Babylon Health employed Cummings as a consultant and that he was paid for his services via Dynamic Maps. Babylon was awarded a contract with at least one Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) to provide its GP at Hand app. The app was endorsed by health and social care secretary Matt Hancock.

In the meantime, responding to queries by the Guardian, lawyers acting for Faculty have declined to explain why the firm received the payments from Dynamic Maps.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free
Contract after contract

Altogether Faculty has been awarded 13 contracts, worth £3m, by the UK government. One such contract is for £930,000 (excluding VAT) to develop an NHS AI lab, improvement of NHSX data analytics, and related services.

Another contract was for “Data scientists for MHCLG Covid-19 response” and worth £400,000. Its remit includes: “Identification, exploration and setup of alternative data sources (e.g. social media, utility providers and telecom bills, credit rating agencies, etc.)”.

More concerns

There are many other concerns about Cummings’ business and other dealings. Here are just a few:

  • Cummings, Ben, and Marc Warner attended Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) meetings, which, it’s claimed, early on in the coronavirus (Covid-19) epidemic considered ‘herd immunity‘ as a workable strategy. The government was forced to abandon that strategy as pressure grew over the likely outcome of tens of thousands of deaths. But by that point, valuable lockdown time had been lost.
  • Cummings chaired a meeting on the coronavirus with representatives of big tech companies. Also present were UK chief scientific adviser Patrick Vallance (who backed the herd immunity strategy) and NHS chief executive Simon Stevens. The companies included “Google, Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and Palantir, alongside smaller British companies, such as food delivery service Deliveroo and Babylon Health”.
  • It’s reported that Public First, a small research company linked to Cummings and government minister Michael Gove, has been awarded without competitive tendering a government contract worth £840,000 on Covid related projects.
  • There’s also the development of a new ARPA (Advanced Research Projects Agency), worth at least £800 million. Reportedly, Cummings’ WhatsApp profile includes the statement, “Get Brexit done, then ARPA”.
Other matters

Of course, there’s Cummings’ infamous journey from London to County Durham during the middle of the coronavirus lockdown. From there, he and his wife and son took a 52 mile round trip to Barnard Castle to, as he claims, test his eyesight whilst driving. Shadow home secretary Nick Thomas-Symonds commented: “The police have confirmed what we all knew, that Dominic Cummings broke the rules he helped to write”. What’s more, it was subsequently discovered that the cottage he and his family stayed at on his parent’s farm was not registered for council tax and breached planning regulations.

Then there’s the Russia controversy. Labour’s Emily Thornberry claims that Cummings has links with ‘Kremlin ideologist’ Vladislav Surkov. But to date there’s little else known about Cummings’ three year stay in Russia.

Longer-term consequences

Cummings is a survivor and his fate appears very much linked to that of Johnson (and vice versa).

But for both, by closely aligning themselves to the coronavirus strategy and the deaths that arise from that strategy, as well as to Brexit and its eventual outcome, their futures will be determined by those consequences.

There again, luck has an annoying habit of running out at the most unexpected of times.

Featured image via YouTube – Guardian News

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. This sounds less about gathering data for analysis to improve a service and more about analysing failure to improve the message. A bit like former CEO of Ford USA, Robert McNamara, who was appointed Secretary of Defence by JFK and who said the Vietnam War could be won if it was run like a business. “Give me the numbers. I want numbers!”

      Governments learned that releasing the numbers of dead, number of sorties flown, bombs dropped etc was raw data citizens could analyse themselves, then decide themselves whether something was worth it, was a waste or just a scam. Whatever this data and numbers are for they aren’t for us. Otherwise we’d know when they’re screwing us over, by how much and who for.

    2. Thank you Canary for this. Perhaps you could start a Tory ‘snouts in the trough’ investigation that extends across all areas of Government. We have Jenrick in land and property development, there must be more for the health services etc etc.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.