Lawyers claim new evidence alleging Dominic Cummings perverted the course of justice

Dominic Cummings is planning on rolling back human rights laws

Lawyers acting on behalf of former Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) prosecutor Nazir Afzal have submitted a dossier to the director of public prosecutions (DPP) and police. They allege that Downing Street special advisor Dominic Cummings perverted the course of justice and committed “six offences under Regulation 6 (and 9) of the ‘Covid’ regulations”.

Perverting the course of justice

The dossier, sent to the Metropolitan police, Durham police, the CPS office in York, and the DPP, runs to 225 pages and includes eight annexes. Mary Wakefield, commissioning editor of the pro-Tory Spectator and Cummings’ wife, is also accused of committing offences.

On 30 October 2020, Afzal’s lawyers stated:

on the basis of eye witness accounts and the explanations given by Mr. Cummings and Ms. Wakefield so far, the Full Code Test is or appears to be satisfied for six offences under Regulation 6 (and 9) of the ‘Covid’ regulations, leaving home without a reasonable excuse in relation to Mr. Cummings, and three in relation to Ms. Wakefield.

They added:

the Full Code test appears to be satisfied in relation to one offence of perverting the course of justice, that arises from Mr. Cummings’ statement in the Rose Garden in Downing Street on 25th May 2020. During that highly publicised statement, Mr. Cummings made public assertions about his conduct at Barnard Castle on 12 April 2020 and his actions on the weekend of 17-19 April 2020, that appear to be wholly inconsistent with accounts of his conduct at that time obtained from eye-witnesses.

Here is an extract of the rose garden statement by Cummings:

Read on...

At least three individuals claim they spotted Cummings on 12 April at Barnard Castle, with one seeing him in the town. Two others claim they saw Cummings on 19 April at Houghall woods, Durham.

This second trip is disputed by Cummings and an earlier investigation by Durham police concluded that:

there might have been a minor breach of the [Covid] Regulations that would have warranted police intervention. Durham Constabulary view this as minor because there was no apparent breach of social distancing.

A spokesperson for 10 Downing Street commented:

The prime minister has said he believes Mr Cummings behaved reasonably and he considers the matter closed. Durham Constabulary have made clear they are not taking any further action against Mr Cummings and that by locating himself at his father’s premises he did not breach the regulations.

Challenging the CPS

Afzal is no stranger to challenging the CPS. When chief prosecutor for North-West England, Afzal was instrumental in reversing an earlier CPS decision not to prosecute males involved in the Rochdale child sex ring. Nine men were subsequently sent to trial and convicted of “rape and conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with girls under the age of 16”.

His work on the Rochdale case saw demonstrations outside his house by the far-right English Defence League. They wrongly believed he was involved in an earlier decision not to prosecute.

In 2007, Afzal was awarded the Daily Mirror’s People’s Award for his work on honour killings. Afzal was also CPS lead on violence against women and forced marriage, race and religious hate crimes, and child abuse and sexual exploitation, and stalking. Afzal is a member of the complaints committee of the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO).

Meanwhile, the dossier compiled by Afzal and his legal team is with the authorities. Given the high profile of one of the parties accused, it’s imperative that the decision to prosecute or otherwise be backed up by hard and detailed evidence.

Featured image via YouTube

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. I look at the eugenicist Cummings and think if that’s the master race humanity is doomed. We might get a thousand years before we’re snuffling around in the dirt like hedgehogs, but even the highly-cultured Egyptians inbred themselves to ruin in less than three thousand years. And they started out with good stock.

    2. The question to be raised; “Is the course of justice perverted now with its horrendous wait times to reach a decision” ? Justice seems to be just a hobby, a shoddy as it awaits its implementation by politicians who were found guilty by it. What happened there for justice when it’s missing the heartbeat to keep it alive?

    3. Next time he wants to test his eyesight by driving I suggest he does it near a cesspit. Obnoxious twat that he is, Covid rules ? they only apply to scum like the benefit scrounges and cleaners etc, planning laws ? I can build where I like, but of course if a benefit scrounger or a cleaner wanted to do the same then obviously they wouldn’t be allowed. Pay Council Tax on second home built illegally ? Well obviously that’s a choice for the individual, unless of course you are a benefit scrounger or a cleaner etc.

      Can you see a pattern emerging ??????????????????

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.