The ‘witch hunt’ against the socialist left continues on Twitter

An image shared during the Twitter witch hunt
Steve Topple

People are claiming there’s a coordinated “witch hunt” to silence left-wing voices on Twitter. The platform has been issuing suspensions, some of them high profile accounts. The latter included The Canary‘s editor-at-large Kerry-Anne Mendoza. But are people falling foul of Twitter’s algorithms? Or is it something more sinister? And, is it really anything new, anyway?

On Sunday 6 December, people were sharing #ReinstateTheLeft. This was in response to Twitter suspending several high profile accounts of left-wing users. The hashtag replaced the now-regular #SocialistSunday one. As The Canary‘s editor-at-large Kerry-Anne Mendoza tweeted:

So, what’s been going on?

The purge

Mendoza wrote on 30 November about how Twitter suspended her account twice. She noted that on both occasions, Twitter claimed it was a mistake. But it then suspended her again. This time for sharing someone’s email address. This was despite the person giving Mendoza permission to do so. And then, Twitter shut Mendoza down for a fourth time. On this occasion it was for sharing her own email address.

But Mendoza’s was not the only account that Twitter claimed had violated its rules. As RD Hale wrote for Council Estate Voices, it banned Rachael Swindon for sharing an LBC phone number and email address. Both of these are in the public domain. Twitter also reportedly banned the account Red Sarah for sharing Craft-D’s track Letter To Corbyn. Twitter claimed she had committed copyright infringement, whereas Craft-D had given her permission to share the song.

Ben Jolly also apparently fell foul of Twitter rules; twice in fact. And as Swindon wrote:

Others who have faced shorter but still entirely unnecessary suspensions include… Cornish Damo… Wrenasaurus, Resist Movement, and Andrew Feinstein.

But why has Twitter been so virulent in its banning of left-wing accounts?

The social network

People have been unpacking what’s been going on. Hale noted that Twitter’s algorithms may be playing a part:

The algorithm seems programmed to recognise certain elements of a tweet but not understand context. This means if you share your own personal email, for example, or the telephone number of the Samaritans, or a picture of your family pet, you could fall victim to mass reporting.

But as he pointed out, people have to complain to Twitter in the first place. And this is why people believe it’s a witch hunt. Swindon wrote that all the people Twitter has suspended have “several things in common”:

They are all prominent left voices on Social Media, they have all continued to support Mr Corbyn, and socialism, and they have all had the audacity to stand up for the oppressed people of occupied Palestine.

Insidious?

Mendoza also touched on this. She noted that:

The rise of Corbyn threatened overlapping interest groups. Zionists of all stripes; conservatives; middle class liberals who prefer working class voices on mute; all recoiled in horror at the mass movement of working class, internationalist, anti-racist socialists

She also believes some of it is down to supporters of Israel targeting pro-Palestinian activists:

The witch hunt argues people oppose Israel, not because of apartheid, but because of their hatred of Jews. No evidence is required to substantiate the claim. If offered, it mostly amounts to the last five times the witch hunt smeared someone. This self-referential disinformation network picks a target, drops its payload, and hopes the pressure generated will force a reaction. An apology, a cancellation, a suspension, a hostile environment. And so every time anyone gives them that, they enable and embolden the witch hunt. Each bogus apology empowers those false narratives, giving them a weight and a credence they don’t deserve. Ultimately, it makes it more likely that they will continue to escalate their attacks.

And they did. This is why Corbyn is now unable to sit in parliament as a Labour MP.

Meanwhile, on Saturday 5 December, a former Labour MP tweeted something which, according to Mendoza’s theory, should have been criticised. Ex-shadow chancellor Ed Balls tweeted:

Nancy Astor is considered by some to have been antisemitic:

Yet Balls can tweet, and go on the BBC saying, that she would be one of his “dream dinner party” guests. This is pertinent to Mendoza’s point about what’s going on here. That is, an establishment figure endorsing an alleged antisemite is fine. Socialists who support Corbyn, defending Palestinians, is not.

But the bigger picture is that the ‘establishment’ has of course always tried to shut down dissenting voices.

Silence of the lambs

People who the establishment and its advocates consider a threat have long been actively silenced or disrupted. The only difference now is that the methods used have changed. It used to be things like fake letters (note the Zinoviev one of 1924), ‘spycops‘ and blacklisting being used to smear people and disrupt working class people organising themselves. Now, social media is also instrumentalised for the same purposes.

Some things stay the same, though. In a similar way to how MI5 monitored the Morning Star‘s predecessor, the Daily Worker, modern, online independent media outlets like The Canary are now targeted by the establishment in an organised manner.

There’s a far bigger question than freedom of speech here. It goes back to how, whenever poor and marginalised people try to organise themselves, the system kicks in and tries to stop them. If we’re ever to move past this point, we’ll need to use more than hashtags to win the war. The storm over Twitter suspending prominent left-wing voices goes right to the heart of the bigger questions about how we organise ourselves as a species and society. So yes, ‘reinstate the left’. But once that’s done, we have a lot more work to do.

Featured image via Resist: Movement for a People’s Party 

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. What is under threat is democracy. It’s important not to argue that it is the left and the left alone which is in danger. Democracy itself is being challenged. This is by no means recent. It is “the revolt of the elites” (Christopher Lasch’s book is well worth reading). As far back as the 1920sd and 30s in the US, thinkers on the right began to ask how the public could be manipulated, bamboozled, how democracy could be deterred. And the Trilateral Commission published their very revealing study in which they identified “an excess of democracy”. It isn’t just the left that is a threat to the rich and powerful, democracy itself is. Those of us who want to see capitalism reformed out of existence may give them the worst nightmares, but liberals who want to see capitalism remain but in reformed version do too. The past 40 years have seen a huge shift of wealth and power away from working people. We now have a global elite, which really is 1%, whose wealth and power are unconscionable. These people believe, as one of their spokespeople put it long ago, “those who own should rule”. They are all paranoid about democracy: Zuckerberg, Bezos, Gates, Branson….They crave a world in which they call the shots. They’ve pretty well got it. Starmer has set up his Chair Circle which gives access to the shadow cabinet to the biggest Party donors. How many Labour voters know that? We have common cause with everyone who believes in democracy in its classic definition: of the people, by the people, for the people. When you let the people decide, the outcomes aren’t certain. Business people always say the thing they hate most is uncertainty. The point is, if we argue that ONLY the left is under threat we alienate millions who don’t identify with the left but believe in democracy. We have to tell the truth: it is democracy which is being stolen from us, not just socialism. We have to build a broad movement of all those who support democracy, and that’s just about the 99%. People don’t believe money should buy power, but that is how our system works. A big majority of people oppose it. We must embrace them. Politically, democracy is the supreme value. It is more valuable than any particular political doctrine. We must make people understand it is close to extinction.

      1. Those Labour leader donors are registered with The House of Commons for all to see. Democracy is for those who can pay for it apparently, it seems. Look also at the list of The Friends Of Israel in the: Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat Parties and see who is taking the shekel; formerly the dollar, to lobby on behalf of the Knesset. The Labour Party is being disassembled from within as Haredim Kier is flushing a SOCIALIST POLITICAL PARTY of socialists, Muslims and Jews who stand for party and national democracy and against the indiscriminate bombing of civilians; of whom, Trump has killed more than the last three American Presidents combined. War profits in the UK, US, France and Germany are obscene. It is time we stopped using Facebook, Twitter & Amazon. May I suggest Parler Free Speech and Rumble as media’s for open discussion (for the moment).

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.