Crowded boat carrying two babies just makes it safely to shore. But the Sun only cares about ‘shocked sunbathers’.

A boat which carried several families with children across the Channel
Support us and go ad-free

On 19 July, a record 430 refugees crossed the Channel in search of safety. Sadly, the first encounters many of them had on Kent’s beaches were aggressive and threatening.

6,000 people have embarked on the perilous Channel crossing in the last 6 months and hundreds of refugees have died trying to cross since 1999.

Steven from grassroots group Channel Rescue told The Canary that their volunteers had been able to help guide one of the boats that was heading towards some rocks outside Kingsdown to safety. Steven told us:

Basically we were spotting ships, we noticed a small vessel heading towards some rocks. We got the attention of some people on the vessel and directed them safely to the shore

One tweet from the group reads:

Steven told us that they helped pull the boat ashore at Oldstairs beach in Kent. But they were greeted aggressively by people on the beach. Channel Rescue Tweeted:

Steven told The Canary:

People were aggressive, videoing us – calling us ‘people smugglers’ – shouting at us and the people on the boat

It was only myself and another volunteer who were trying to assist, everyone else was shouting and being disruptive

Steven told us that the boat – which only had a very basic motor – was carrying 20-30 people including two babies.

We asked Steven why Channel Rescue’s onshore response work in Kent is important. He replied:

yesterday was really hot so there is a risk that people crossing will be dehydrated, or have sunstroke, but when it’s cold there is a risk of hypothermia.

“Heartless and unfair reporting”

Refugees crossing the Channel are risking their lives in an attempt to seek sanctuary in the UK. However, mainstream media reports showed no concern at all for the welfare of people arriving.

The Sun reported the landing at Oldstairs beach without mentioning the risk the refugees were taking to make the crossing, or the disaster which could have taken place had the boat hit the rocks. Instead the Sun’s coverage focused on the “shocked” sunbathers, and reports that the “police were called”, feeding into the narrative that those arriving are criminals. Channel Rescue responded angrily:

“Negative”, “inaccurate”, and “Dehumanising”

According to Steven the mainstream media reporting about the channel crossings is mostly “negative” and “inaccurate”, feeding into a narrative that seeks to “penalise people for seeking sanctuary”.

Steven pointed out that the Sun’s article mentions that people were taken for “processing”. He commented:

This is dehumanising language. You process food, but these are people.

This kind of language kicks people when they’re down. Politicians and the mainstream media talk about people as if they were illegal, and this bleeds into the general public’s opinions too. The government is doing this intentionally, to create a ‘hostile environment’ [for refugees]

The Canary contacted the Sun for a comment on its one-sided reporting, but we received no reply.

Government rhetoric

Of course, the narrative played out in the mainstream media is just a reflection of the government’s rhetoric, which is aimed at criminalising those that make the crossing to the UK. Priti Patel has announced that she plans to make crossings to the UK “unviable“. The planned Nationality and Borders Bill aims to further criminalise those seeking asylum in the UK. The government has also announced this month that it wants to detain asylum seekers in offshore centres such as disused ships or oil rigs.

We need to counteract this hateful rhetoric

We need to stop listening to the hateful rhetoric which is being weaponised against refugees by the government and in the mainstream media. This atmosphere of hatred and criminalisation is being whipped up intentionally. But ordinary people can organise to support those arriving on Kent’s beaches and those who are suffering as a result of the government’s hostile environment policy.

One way to do this is to support the work of Channel Rescue. The group’s aim is to provide on-shore support for refugees crossing the channel and to monitor the activities of Border Force. Steven told us that they do this by monitoring remotely from the clifftops of Kent. The group also has a boat to help monitor from the sea. Steven explained that the group needs support:

if we had more volunteers we would be able to cover a larger area, and if we had more money we could run the boat for longer.

Steven told The Canary that the group hopes that its “human-rights monitoring” will help to detect if the British state is using ‘push-backs’ to stop refugees reaching the UK. Push-backs have been used widely in the Mediterranean to prevent boats from reaching European shores, but the practice is dangerous and potentially illegal under international law. 

Steven told us that the answer is to facilitate ways for refugees to safely enter the UK:

There is an urgent need for safe and legal routes to the UK. No one should feel they need to make the treacherous journey across the Channel.

Unfortunately, the government’s dangerous and uncaring policies mean that many more people will be forced to risk their lives getting to the UK. It’s up to us to welcome them, and set up grassroots-controlled infrastructure that is ready to support them.

Featured image via Channel Rescue (with permission)

Support us and go ad-free

Get involved

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop

 

The Canary Fund us
  • Show Comments
    1. Is The Canary suggesting France isn’t a safe country? It appears to in the opening sentence. I thought anti French sentiment had died a long time ago.
      It’s risible to suggest that the UK is in anyway responsible for situations like this. Those who put the babies in the boat are responsible. Nobody else.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.