How many dead bears does it take to celebrate the Queen’s Jubilee?
Queen Elizabeth I used to enjoy the ‘sport’ of bear-baiting. That’s the grizzly practice of people setting a pack of dogs on an incapacitated bear to see who makes it out alive.
Thankfully, bear-baiting is a thing of the UK’s distant past. But bears – dead ones – will very much be present at Elizabeth II’s upcoming Jubilee celebrations. That’s because, according to PETA, each and every ceremonial bearskin hat that the UK’s army guards wear requires the taking of a bear’s life. And if the rehearsal was anything to go by, there will be lots of dead-bear-headed guards at the ceremony.
It doesn’t actually take any dead bears to celebrate the Queen’s Jubilee though. Here’s why.
Time to move on
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) has been under pressure for a while to ditch the hats. Campaigners, including Born Free, have urged the department to end their use. So have some 75 MPs, who signed an early day motion calling on the MoD to recognise that the use of real fur:
is not in line with the UK Government’s commitment to have and promote the highest standards of animal welfare
Most recently, an assembly of wildlife photographers, such as Springwatch’s Megan McCubbin and president of We Animals Media Jo-Anne McArthur, have joined with PETA to pressure the government to drop the fur. In a letter to officials, reported on by Digital Camera World, they said:
As wildlife photographers who have spent our lives documenting the beauty and fragility of the natural world, we are acutely aware of the need to protect – not pillage – the living planet, which includes the animals we share it with.
Read on...
The perfect alternative
PETA has even worked together with a faux furrier called ECOPEL to develop an alternative for the ministry. Along with the designer Stella McCartney, they have come up with a product that Born Free says is “visually indistinguishable from the real thing.” Under MoD tests, the alternative also performed as well as the version made of bears, PETA asserts. Moreover, ECOPEL has offered to provide an unlimited amount of these free to the MoD up to 2030.
However, the MoD has refused. In particular, the defence secretary Ben Wallace has opposed the move.
Ben Wallace & bear hats scandal grows, we now learn that he overrode commitments from Defence Ministers & from Prime Minister to end the use of bear fur hats in British Army. We will not let him get away with it @BWallaceMP @BorisJohnson @carrielbjohnson @PETAUK @ZacGoldsmith pic.twitter.com/Y8xsdX2kwZ
— dominic dyer (@domdyer70) November 21, 2021
According to the Blackpool Gazette, Wallace has been challenging efforts to switch to a cruelty-free alternative since 2006, when a fellow MP first floated the idea.
An unethical choice
The MoD has suggested that the caps are made from bears that die in state-sanctioned culls in Canada. But as PETA and Born Free have pointed out, this is somewhat misleading. Yes, the Canadian state sanctions bear killing. But it’s not generally by the state, it’s by trophy hunters.
The UK government claims to be committed to banning the import of trophies from hunting. And an army spokesperson insisted to the Gazette that:
Bears are never hunted to order for use by the MoD.
But whether the bears are ‘hunted to order’ or not, they are still hunted. And the fact that trophy hunters are able to make a tidy profit from selling the skins of the bears they kill can only incentivise more bloodshed.
Canada isn’t exempt from the ethical issues that surround black bear hunting in places like the US, such as the killing of mothers. As the Georgia Straight reported in 2015, it has also faced questions of the accuracy of its bear population figures, and the sustainability of its hunting quotas. In short, just because UK guards are wearing dead bears from Canada on their heads, it doesn’t make it ethical or sustainable.
With a free supply of alternative caps on offer, it doesn’t need to take any dead bears to celebrate the Queen’s Jubilee or ceremonially dress the army for other purposes.
The fact that this upcoming celebration will feature so many of them is nothing more than gruesome and unethical.
Featured image via Ed Dunens / Flickr, cropped to 700×403, licensed under CC BY 2.0
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
Hi Tracy, Happy PlatJub
Still confused as ever. First, you are entitled not to like hunting (It’s quite endearing). But, that is about you, not the army or bears.
The British army, along with a number of others, buys (on the open market) by-products from the bear cull in order to make ceremonial hats. They don’t contract hunters to shoot to order. Hunters buy permits and pay taxes, making the bear hunt an asset on the foreign exchequer that assists in paying for conservation – if their government had to pay culling contractors, it would be a liability. I apologise if these simple facts trigger your anti-capitalist Marxist sentiments. If they didn’t buy the pelts, it wouldn’t make the slightest difference to the bear cull. It follows that buying real fur does not compromise the UK government’s animal welfare snowflake vote-catcher. It also follows that not buying real fur won’t make the slightest difference to the bear cull. Your argument is one of false logic.
There are videos available with experts saying that the fake version simply doesn’t cut the mustard, typically fieldsportschannel.tv/bearskins/. I imagine that Peta (PetAnnihilation) are being a tad optimistic in their claims about the findings. Quelle surprise!
What is beyond argument is that fake fur continually sheds plastic microfibres and the microfibres find their way into the drains, then our rivers, then the oceans, where they kill millions of sea creatures and may well end up killing all of us, too. When washed, fake fur also sheds millions of micro-fibres that go into the sewers and even if caught in the solids, end up being spread on agricultural land as “organic fertilisers” and thus directly into our food supply. Real fur, on the other hand, is fully bio-degradeable. and digestible.
But thanks for trying to spoil Betty’s PlatJub. I am sure you feel better now you have polished your piety for the occasion.
Here’s an unintentionally revolutionary idea. Abandon the use of archaic uniforms that no longer serve the original prupose of making soldiers look large and imposing. The idea that the size of individual members of the armed forces would intimidate the enemy is laughable. Just because something is traditional doesn’t mean it’s a good idea.
Problem of pollution from synthetic fibres solved.