Pro-Israel right-wingers were reportedly at the heart of this weekend’s coup at the BBC. And they may well have put the final nail in its coffin.
The BBC had tried to please or appease its far-right critics by consistently underplaying Israeli crimes, echoing Israeli propaganda, omitting key information, and displaying strong anti-Palestinian bias. But genocide-apologists will not settle for crumbs. They want total submission to their dystopian billionaire agenda.
This attack on the BBC is highly concerning as Britain’s dominant source of news. But let’s not pretend that the situation before the coup was anything other than state propaganda with a smiling face.
The BBC‘s extreme bias amid Gaza atrocities
During Israel’s genocide in Gaza, the BBC has really shown its true colours more clearly than ever before. It has systematically chosen not to call crimes by their names. Earlier this year hundreds of media workers accused it of disseminating racist “PR for the Israeli government and military”. The “opaque editorial decisions and censorship” relating to Israel’s atrocities, they said, had been a huge problem.
Through an ostensible commitment to impartiality, the broadcaster has not only treated a genocidal colonial occupier and the people whose territory it occupies as equal combatants. It has also gone out of its way to foreground Israel’s side of the story, treating Israeli lives as more important than Palestinian lives. One report, for instance, showed that Israelis who died got 33 times more coverage, despite Israeli occupation forces killing at least 34 times more Palestinians. That was just the tip of the iceberg.
Not extreme enough for the far right
Now, the coup that has toppled two key players at the BBC — director general Tim Davie and News CEO Deborah Turness — has had the nerve to suggest there was too much ‘anti-Israel’ bias at the organisation. And Turness dared to insist upon leaving that “BBC News is not institutionally biased”. She’s wrong. It absolutely is. It’s just not the kind of bias her enemies were talking about.
One such enemy is board member Robbie Gibb, who the Observer called “the central character in this” steering this development. Gibb is a pro-Israel right-winger with links to both the Conservative Party and propaganda outlet the Jewish Chronicle. He has long sought to push the BBC to the far right or, alternatively, “blow the place up”.
Government-appointed directors supported Gibb’s interference. And his friend Michael Prescott, a far-from-neutral ‘adviser’, backed up the assault with an extreme memo saying the BBC had:
- Focused too much on the suffering of Palestinian women and children during the Gaza genocide
- Been too critical of Israel on BBC Arabic
- Been too critical of fascist billionaire sex pest Donald Trump
- Reported too much about racism
- Been too sympathetic on trans rights
- Not pushed immigration stories enough
In short, the BBC wasn’t supportive enough of a divisive, genocidal, far-right agenda.
BBC Arabic had failed to water down Israel’s crimes or prioritise Israeli suffering over Palestinian suffering in the way that its English counterpart had. As Prescott lamented, it almost seemed like BBC Arabic wanted to “paint Israel as the aggressor”, in other words, give an accurate impression of the colonial occupier’s genocide in Gaza.
Give fascists an inch, they’ll take a mile
The BBC has always been subservient to the interests of the British establishment, and has moved further and further rightwards over time (consider its copious platforming of Nigel Farage and attempts to court Reform voters). But it has usually sought to maintain at least a veneer of professionalism, impartiality and objectivity. And it genuinely has done some good work in its time.
Impartiality, however, doesn’t mean treating everyone equally. Murderers aren’t the same as their victims. Fascists aren’t the same as anti-fascists. And colonisers aren’t the same as the people they colonise. Impartiality means looking at the evidence honestly, and sharing what you find. You can mention that fascists, colonisers, and murderers deny their crimes, but that denial shouldn’t be the main focus of the story, especially if there’s clear evidence of their crimes.
Too often, the BBC has sought to please powerful critics rather than doing real journalism. By giving in now, it has only emboldened the far right further. And it may just have sealed its own descent into oblivion too.
Image via the Canary













I can remember when the BBC was called the gold standard of broadcast journalism. Now it’s iron pyrite.
It was also under Tim that the ridiculous slurs, and outright manipulation campaign against Corbyn was initiated, remember?
The Soviet cap, the insane framing of him as a racist – this BBC leadership team was anything BUT friendly. What they did to Trump that brought them down they were happily doing to Corbyn and allies as well.
Do bear that in mind.
No, their replacements are not going to be any better, and likely considerably worse. That doesn’t mean we should defend the outgoing.
BTW Canary, you really should read this article, and consider a request to reprint it in your pages: https://warwickpowell.substack.com/p/post-liberalisms-funhouse-mirror?publication_id=1965102&post_id=178474751&isFreemail=true&r=szqta&triedRedirect=true
Let’s hope that Trump will bankrupt the BBC.
“Impartiality, however, doesn’t mean treating everyone equally. Murderers aren’t the same as their victims. Fascists aren’t the same as anti-fascists. And colonisers aren’t the same as the people they colonise. Impartiality means looking at the evidence honestly, and sharing what you find. You can mention that fascists, colonisers, and murderers deny their crimes, but that denial shouldn’t be the main focus of the story, especially if there’s clear evidence of their crimes.
Too often, the BBC has sought to please powerful critics rather than doing real journalism. By giving in now, it has only emboldened the far right further. And it may just have sealed its own descent into oblivion too.”
The BBC has denied then downplayed global warming for decades, for years they would go running to Nigel Lawson (ex Thatcher flunky and GWPF propaganda outfit honcho) to spew his pro fossil fuel rubbish whenever a mild mannered actual climate scientist was interviewed on the topic. In the name of ‘balance’? Yet they don’t invite the spokesperson for the Flat Earth society to give rebuttals to those who accept that the Earth is roughly spherical. It is an agreed fact, beyond debate by serious minded people, just like global warming. Grrrrr.
I agree with you, Tom Clother.
The BBC is damned whatever it does. It tries to protect itself from political interference but then acquiesces to the government of the day to protect its existence. This creates an impossible task.
British radio and television are considered the best in the world and the BBC the epitome of that. BBC News is the most trusted around the world. It is absolutely essential, therefore, the BBC continues in its current form.
The BBC has a tendency to not respond and then issue an apology even though it is not at fault. This must stop.
The video currently in question was not created by the BBC, it was done by an outside company. The speech, being around an hour long needed to be edited and I would bet the effect of the hour long speech was as it was edited. Certainly, Trump’s followers thought so as did the judiciary which found the invaders guilty.
Trump has no decency, no morals and is dangerous. All he does is create chaos for his own benefit.
Because of this, huge swathes of those in charge just comply with what he demands. Trump is a dictator of the worst sort, despite the fact that the West decries dictators.
I really hope the BBC stands its ground and defends itself against Trump’s actions. Any case should be heard here as the US judiciary is in Trump’s pocket.
Trump’s reputation has not in any way been harmed, he is just being him as he always is. It must be incredibly tiring being so relentlessly unpleasant and aggressive all the time.