New pesticides could have a negative impact on bee populations according to a recent scientific study by researchers at the Royal Holloway University of London. Sulfoximine-based insecticides are a replacement for neonicotinoid pesticides. EU member states banned the use of neonicotinoids in April due to their negative effect on the reproduction and cognitive ability of bees.
Sulfoximine-based insecticides are thought to be a safer alternative to these damaging pesticides. They’re currently being registered for use in Europe and around the globe. However, a new study [pdf] published in Nature has indicated these new pesticides could also have a negative effect on bee populations.
As part of the study, the researchers exposed 26 wild bumblebee colonies to sulfoximine-based insecticides in realistic quantities. Researchers also included 26 bee colonies that they did not expose to any insecticides (the control group).
Exposure to the chemicals had a significant effect on the population growth of the exposed colonies after only two weeks. Colonies in contact with the pesticides produced fewer workers; saw a 54% reduction in offspring, and produced no new queens. Queen bees are vital to the long-term survival of bee colonies.
Based on current research, sulfoximine-based insecticides do not actively kill bees, but the effect they have on reproduction could have detrimental consequences. Crop and plant life pollination requires a healthy bee population. A declining bee population could negatively affect our food supplies.
An insufficient replacement
The results of the study indicate that sulfoximine-based insecticides are not a sufficient replacement for neonicotinoids. More research is necessary to assess the long-term effects of sulfoximine-based insecticides and other new pesticides and the influence of different exposure levels on bees.
The upcoming ban on neonicotinoids is great news for our bees – but the Government must ensure that alternative pesticides don’t harm these crucial pollinators too.
This study shows that replacing one harmful pesticide with another is not the solution to protecting our crops. Sulfoxaflor should not be approved in the UK at this time due to concerns about its safety for bees.”
Featured image by James Johnstone/Flickr
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?