Illegal Saudi attack on water facility in Yemen tied to Brighton arms factory

A Yemeni child running through a bombed building
Support us and go ad-free

A 2018 UN Security Council report has shown that weapons components produced in a Brighton arms factory were involved in an unlawful Saudi attack on Yemen.

Report on Yemen

The 329-page UN report is dated 26 January 2018 and signed by UN staffer Ahmed Himmiche. It includes an investigation into two bombings of a water facility in Ban al-Hareth District, Sana.

The first bombing occurred on 13 September 2016, when:

military aircraft dropped four items of explosive ordnance on the Alsonidar factory complex

On 22 September 2016, the Saudi-led coalition bombed the facility once again, and “completely destroyed” it.

There were no civilian injuries or deaths during either bombing.

International Humanitarian Law

Though the Saudi coalition argued that it targeted the facility because it was “becoming a military manufacturing unit”, the UN panel found:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

no evidence to suggest that there were military personnel or equipment in, or in the vicinity of the strike, immediately before, or during the strike.

The panel demonstrated through 11 separate points how it found the coalition’s argument “unconvincing”. Therefore, the panel claimed it: [268]

is unconvinced that the Saudi Arabia-led coalition complied with IHL [International Humanitarian Law] principles relating to distinction [between civilians and combatants].

UK arms manufacturer

In a technical analysis of the physical evidence found at the scene after the first bombing, the report found a “component from a Paveway laser guidance system fin”.

The component bore markings of UK arms manufacturer EDO MBM Technology Limited, based in Brighton. The “Paveway IV” technology, the Argus reports, “helps [the bomb] find its target once it has been released”.

MP for Brighton Caroline Lucas responded to the findings, saying they rang “very loud alarm bells”.

In another UN investigation, a separate panel found that the same technology may have been used in the bombing of a water bottling plant in al-Mahala, Lahj in 2016. It concluded:

It was not possible to determine from just the fin whether it was a GBU-12 Paveway II (US manufactured) or Paveway IV (UK manufactured) laser guidance unit.

UK arms sales to Saudi Arabia

In 2016, the Guardian revealed that “one in three Saudi air raids on Yemen hit civilian sites”. One year later, the same outlet showed that the Saudi-led coalition was “deliberately attacking civilians and infrastructure in rebel-held areas”.

In March, Yemen-based Mwatana for Human Rights released a report that examined the use of US and European arms by the Saudi-led coalition. It stated that “allies of western countries commit atrocities with western-supplied weaponry”, and the US and UK have “accelerated arms sales because of the war”. The report notes that attacks between “April 2015 and April 2018 killed at least 203 civilians and injured at least 749”. It found evidence of US and UK arms being involved in those attacks.

And as The Canary reported in February:

Britain also provides political, technical, and logistical support; and UK officials – who are often in the Saudi command room – “have access to lists of targets” in Yemen.

Campaigners in the UK have fought back against UK arms sales to Saudi Arabia. On 20 June, UK-based Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) won “a landmark legal challenge against the UK government over its arms sales to Saudi Arabia”. It argued that:

the decision to continue to license military equipment for export to Saudi Arabia, which is leading a coalition of forces in the conflict in Yemen, was unlawful, as there was a clear risk that the arms might be used in a serious violation of international humanitarian law.

On 12 July, however, the UK government won the right to appeal the decision.

The latest details of UK-manufactured arms being used in the bombings of civilian infrastructure may likely influence the final decision.

Featured image via Flickr/Felton Davis

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us