An online petition calling for the government not to suspend parliament has gathered well over one million signatures.
The e-petition on Parliament’s website gained 100,000 signatures in just a few hours, the threshold it needed for it to be debated by MPs.
Signatures on the petition continue to climb, despite the Queen approving an order on Wednesday afternoon to prorogue Parliament no earlier than September 9 and no later than September 12, until October 14.
Thousands of people protested against the plans to suspend Parliament, with rallies in London, Edinburgh and other cities within hours of Prime Minister Boris Johnson announcing the decision.
Critics, including Commons Speaker John Bercow, called the move a “constitutional outrage”, designed to stop MPs from intervening as the UK heads towards a no-deal Brexit on October 31.
But the protests were dismissed as “phoney” by Commons Leader Jacob Rees-Mogg.
He said the move was not intended to limit the time available for MPs to debate Brexit, but will allow the Government to tackle other issues.
“I think the outrage is phoney and it is created by people who don’t want us to leave the European Union and are trying very hard to overturn the referendum result and don’t want the benefits of leaving the European Union.”
He added: “Parliament wasn’t going to be sitting for most of this time anyway. This is completely constitutional and proper.”
With more than one million signatures, the e-petition is now one of Parliament’s top five most-signed proposals.
In March, a petition entitled “Revoke Article 50 and remain in the EU” gathered more than six million signatures, becoming the best-supported proposal in the history of the House of Commons and Government’s e-petitions website.
The now-closed petition was rejected by the Government, in a response explaining that revoking Article 50 would “undermine” democracy.
Featured image via UK Parliament
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?