Labour has written to the prime minister asking him if he agreed with a former aide’s controversial views on black people and about forcing contraception on the working classes.
Party chiefs have also called for answers on how Andrew Sabisky, who resigned this week after his “offensive” past writings were discovered online, came to be hired to work in Downing Street.
Sabisky, who once suggested enforcing the uptake of contraception to stop unplanned pregnancies from creating a “permanent underclass”, announced he was standing down on Monday evening.
He said he did not want to be a distraction to the government after previous comments made by him, including that Black people had IQs that were “close to the typical boundary for mild mental retardation”, were unearthed.
Ministers said Sabisky “jumped before he was pushed” following a slew of “reprehensible” past comments, but Labour has demanded answers about how such a figure came to be employed by Downing Street.
Labour chair Ian Lavery, in his letter to Boris Johnson demanding more information on the level of vetting involved, wrote: “Andrew Sabisky has thankfully left your Government.
“However, the disturbing nature of his previous comments on eugenics, race and women, which have been well documented in the press, raise very serious concerns about your own views.
“Furthermore, there are unanswered questions about how somehow with such abhorrent views was ever considered for employment in the first place.”
Lavery pointed to past writings by the Conservative Party leader, including how he wrote when editor of the Spectator magazine that “Orientals…have larger brains and higher IQ scores…blacks are at the other pole”, and asked whether the PM agreed with Sabisky’s views on ethnic minorities.
The Labour MP added: “Boris Johnson has serious questions to answer about how this appointment was made and whether he agrees with his vile views.”
Sabisky, when announcing he was quitting, described media reports about his previously-aired opinions as “mad”.
But business minister Kwasi Kwarteng blasted Sabisky’s past remarks as “offensive” and “racist”, and alleged the aide walked out on the government before he could be sacked.
Kwarteng told Sky News he thought the government would be “looking at vetting processes more closely” in light of the drama.
It comes as veteran politician Ken Clarke called on Johnson to rein in his chief adviser Dominic Cummings following his plan to recruit “misfits and weirdos” into Number 10.
The former Tory chancellor said the brains behind the Vote Leave campaign would would only last in the job if his “personal appearances stop” and he goes back to being a “back room operator”.
Cummings made headlines before the cabinet reshuffle when, in tongue-in-cheek fashion, he told broadcast reporters that cartoon superheroes would do a better job than Johnson’s then-current crop of close circle ministers.
“PJ Masks will do a greater job than all of them put together,” he said, when asked about the reshuffle.
But Clarke told ITV News’s Acting Prime Minister podcast that former chief advisers did not “dress exotically and pose for the photographers before giving, quite blatantly, briefings all over the place about what their views are on everything”.
Leaving his house on Tuesday morning, Cummings suggested people should read about “super-forecasters”.
He told awaiting reporters: “Read Philip Tetlock’s Superforecasters instead of political pundits who don’t know what they’re talking about.”
Superforecasting is a book by Philip Tetlock on the science of prediction.
Sabisky – a self-professed “geopolitical forecaster” – wrote on Cummings’ website in 2014: “One way to get around the problems of unplanned pregnancies creating a permanent underclass would be to legally enforce universal uptake of long-term contraception at the onset of puberty.
“Vaccination laws give it a precedent, I would argue.”
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?