The odds of Lisa Nandy becoming the next Labour Party leader currently seem low. But it’s still worth looking into her record, which should raise some big red flags for the Labour left.
The right won in 2019. But will it win in 2020 too?
In the fight against Boris Johnson and his hard–right Thatcherites, many UK progressives turned our attention away from our partners’ flaws during the 2019 election. But now, Johnson’s set to govern for five years. So it’s time to look closely at our partners and work out who can lead a strong fightback. And the Labour leadership election is our first chance to do so.
Keir Starmer, on the other hand, appeals to establishment forces inside and outside of the party. This is despite (or perhaps because of) the key role he played in the party’s disastrous second Brexit referendum policy. The political chameleon is odds on to win the contest.
Lisa Nandy, meanwhile, opposed going against the result of the 2016 Brexit referendum; and she may hope this will help her appeal to members in Leave-voting areas. Politics lecturer Eric Shaw wrote recently in the Conversation that Nandy is “a prominent member of Labour’s soft left” and “has also been associated with the “Blue Labour” tendency” (which favours social conservatism but centre-left economics). Nandy’s backers claim that victory for her would help to “end in-fighting” in the party and bring unity. But there are three big reasons why this is unlikely.
1) Remember Owen Smith? Well, Nandy co-chaired his campaign.
Nandy left the shadow cabinet during the 2016 coup attempt against Corbyn. And she didn’t just back Owen Smith to replace him. She actually became the co-chair of his dire leadership campaign (which openly called for a second referendum on Brexit).
Nandy also explains her decision to quit shadow cabinet: we needed to unite the party. lol ok
— Asa Winstanley (@AsaWinstanley) July 21, 2016
Great scoop in today’s Sunday Times.
While Lisa Nandy was co-chair of the Owen Smith campaign in 2016 to beat Corbyn she met with Blair. Most members would find that deeply discouraging. https://t.co/sZhfKMRt2p
— Aaron Bastani (@AaronBastani) February 2, 2020
In the 2016 Panorama on Labour Party divisions, Nandy (apparently without a hint of irony) said the infighting “means that we’re distracted from the real task, which is to unite” to oppose the Tories.
She also argued that the “public are moving away from us” on a number of issues. But in reality, Corbyn’s principles and proposals helped to push Labour membership over 500,000 – the biggest number since the 1970s. The party’s 2017 election campaign, meanwhile, was largely successful despite massive establishment opposition, with Labour increasing its vote share more than under any other leader since 1945.
2) Smears and Palestine
Under Corbyn’s leadership, Labour has faced constant smears relating largely to his strong support for Palestinian rights and criticism of Israeli crimes. And Nandy consistently helped to amplify these attacks.
Nandy also became chair of Labour Friends Of Palestine & The Middle East in 2018, insisting “now is the time to do more” to help Palestinians. But it doesn’t seem like she ‘did more’. Because at the time of writing, the group’s website suggests that its last parliamentary activity came in 2017 and its last update was a 2018 piece by Nandy talking about her future plans.
The LFPME website doesn't seem to have been updated since the end of 2018, is it still a thing?
— Norma Daiquiri (@Norma_Daiquiri) February 14, 2020
3) Comfortable with the right
Nandy recently stressed that one of Corbyn’s big achievements as leader was to make Labour “proud to wear our values on our sleeve” again.
But what are Nandy’s ‘values’? Well, she:
- Opposes open selection (where Labour MPs wouldn’t just have a ‘job for life’).
- Said Labour shouldn’t ‘pick sides’ during strikes.
- Suggested that Spain’s handling of the Catalan independence movement could be a model for dealing with Scottish independence.
- Reportedly spoke at Blue Labour’s 2016 conference (though she has allegedly said its ideology isn’t the answer to Britain’s problems).
- Admitted that her dad thinks she’s “right-wing”.
- Suggested Labour’s many manifesto promises ‘scared’ voters.
- Got the backing of failed right-wing leadership candidate Jess Phillips.
- Pushed highly misleading claims about Labour’s crime policy and stance on Russia.
- Wrote at university that “The LGB (lesbian, gay, bisexual) society for example doesn’t accept straight members, but we still have to pay for it, something many find unacceptable” (she now insists she “will always support” LGBTQ+ comrades).
As some have pointed out, her views also seem to change with the wind:
Maybe (probably!) I'm just irredeemably wonkish, but I just think that the electorate will spot the hole in "we need to be honest about what we can afford, instead of talking about halving or scrapping tuition fees" *five minutes later* "of course, I will scrap tuition fees".
— Stephen Bush (@stephenkb) February 12, 2020
Last week @lisanandy signed pledges for public ownership of
— We Own It (@We_OwnIt) February 13, 2020
Hope and inspiration?
In short, Nandy is unlikely to rally and inspire Labour’s members – especially those who backed Corbyn.
She's like Marvin the Paranoid Android. So depressing. So negative. She just drones on……and on
— Alison Kennedy (@alisonkennedy65) February 13, 2020
But if you do know someone who may be tempted to back her in the leadership contest, you may want to send this article over to them.
Featured image via YouTube – BBC News
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?