Tory government accused of ‘corrosive’ lack of transparency over coronavirus spending figures

Support us and go ad-free

Rishi Sunak’s emergency Plan for Jobs to tackle the coronavirus (Covid-19) crisis will involve up to £10bn less spending on previously planned projects, economists said.

Analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) revealed that the proposals – which the chancellor said could amount to up to £30bn of support – are partly funded by spending cuts on previously planned projects and investments which are now deemed less of a priority or infeasible given the Covid-19 plan.

The think-tank was critical of the “lack of transparency” from the Treasury which is “corrosive to trust”.

The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) said Sunak’s Plan for Jobs would ultimately cost around £20bn, the IFS said.

Alongside the major announcements, it was revealed “with much less fanfare” that there were reductions in previously planned spending.

According to the IFS, the Treasury’s decisions on funding for the devolved administrations suggest they expect these underspends to amount to almost £8bn, while the OBR expects it to be more like £10bn.

For instance, the IFS said the £2bn green homes grant announced by Sunak is funded from within pre-existing spending limits and almost half the £400m of cash for traineeships and apprenticeships is reallocated money.

IFS associate director David Phillips said: “In its summer economic update last week, the UK government launched its £30bn Plan for Jobs.

“What it didn’t say was that almost £8bn of that is to be paid for by spending less than previously planned on other things.

“Indeed, the whole of the £5bn of additional capital spending trumpeted by the prime minister a couple of weeks ago in fact represents funding previously allocated to other capital projects which will no longer happen this year.’

“Meanwhile, the OBR thinks the Plan for Jobs will cost £20bn, not £30bn.

“So the £30bn package turns out to be more like £12bn of additional spending plus some £8bn or so reallocated from previously planned projects.

“While such reallocations may be perfectly sensible – the Covid-19 crisis may have made some projects less of a priority or even infeasible in the short term – official policy documents should be clear what is happening and where spending is expected to be lower than previously planned.”

 

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop

 

The Canary Fund us