UK government admits Test and Trace programme ‘breaks data protection law’

Support us and go ad-free

The government has admitted that England’s coronavirus (Covid-19) Test and Trace programme has broken a data protection law, according to a letter sent to privacy campaigners.

The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) acknowledged it had failed to carry out a risk assessment on how the system would affect privacy.

It follows the threat of legal action from the Open Rights Group (ORG), which claims that the programme to trace contacts of those infected with Covid-19 has been operating unlawfully since its launch on 28 May.

A spokesman for the DHSC said there is “no evidence” of data being used in an unlawful way.

Carrying out a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) – which helps to identify and mitigate risks relating to use of personal data – is a requirement under General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) laws.

In response to a pre-action letter from privacy campaigning organisation ORG, the government confirmed that, while a DPIA is a legal requirement, it has not yet been completed.

The letter from DHSC, which is dated 15 July, said the legal requirement is being “finalised”.

Calling the government’s behaviour “reckless”, Jim Killock, executive director of ORG, said: “We have a ‘world beating’ unlawful Test and Trace programme.

“A crucial element in the fight against the pandemic is mutual trust between the public and the government, which is undermined by their operating the programme without basic privacy safeguards.”

Ravi Naik, legal director of the data rights agency AWO, instructed to act on behalf of ORG, said that failing to carry out the “appropriate assessment” meant all data collected is “tainted”.

“These legal requirements are more than just a tick-box compliance exercise,” he said.

“They ensure that risks are mitigated before processing occurs, to preserve the integrity of the system. Instead, we have a rushed-out system, seemingly compromised by unsafe processing practices.”

ORG is just one group to raise privacy concerns over the scheme, with a former cabinet minister also previously warning of “serious errors” in its implementation.

Labour’s Lord Hain said last month that the NHS had failed to carry out its legal data protection obligations prior to the launch and had entered into data-sharing relationships “on unnecessarily favourable terms to large companies”.

A DHSC spokesman said: “There is no evidence of data being used unlawfully.

“NHS Test and Trace is committed to the highest ethical and data governance standards – collecting, using, and retaining data to fight the virus and save lives, while taking full account of all relevant legal obligations.

“We have rapidly created a large-scale test and trace system in response to this unprecedented pandemic.

“The programme is able to offer a test to anyone who needs one and trace the contacts of those who test positive, to stop the spread of the virus.”

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. I don’t think this is about Contact and Trace over Covid. I think this more a kind of 1984 Snitch and Trace, to build up a national database of informants. Once you’ve snitched for any reason and were not enticed to do it, you’ll be much more easy to entice, even enforce, through persuasion, bribery or threat.

      The government won’t need legality when soon it’ll be the law of the jackboots – he who wears the jackboots decides what’s law.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.