Experts ‘do not have confidence that R is currently below 1 in England’

Support us and go ad-free

There is a risk the overall coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic in the UK is growing as figures for the reproduction number (R value) suggest it has risen above 1.0. Data released on Friday by the Government Office for Science and the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) shows the estimate for R across the UK is now between 0.9 and 1.1. This is an increase from the range of between 0.8 and 1.0 one week ago.


The growth rate of coronavirus transmission, which reflects how quickly the number of infections is changing day by day, has also changed slightly across the UK since last week, with early indications the value may be increasing. The latest growth rate for the whole of the UK is between minus 3% to plus 1%, a slight change from between minus 4% to minus 1% last week.

The growth rate means the number of new infections is somewhere between shrinking by 3% and growing by 1% every day. The most likely value is towards the middle of the range, experts say.

Scientists say there have been indications these values may be increasing, with estimated ranges rising slightly from previous publications. The R number represents the number of people each coronavirus positive person goes on to infect.

In England, the R is between 0.9 and 1.0, and the growth rate is minus 3% to zero. Recent changes in transmission are not yet fully reflected in the estimates because the data used to calculate R and growth rate reflect the situation from a few weeks ago. It is also important to recognise the figures are estimates and there is a high degree of uncertainty with them, the experts say.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

A time delay between initial infection and the need for hospital care usually means it may take between two to three weeks for the changes in the spread of coronavirus to be reflected in the estimates. But models that use coronavirus testing data, which have less of a time delay, indicate higher values for R in England, the Government Office for Science statement said. It added:

For this reason, Sage does not have confidence that R is currently below 1.0 in England.

We would expect to see this change in transmission reflected in the R and growth rate published over the next few weeks as we gain more certainty of what is currently happening.

The scientists caution estimates of R and growth rate per day are less reliable and less useful in determining the state of the pandemic when disease incidence is low, or where there is significant variability in the population, for example during local outbreaks. They say when this is the case, estimates of R and growth rate become insufficiently robust to inform policy decisions. Both are average measures and will smooth over localised outbreaks or over short periods of time.

HEALTH Coronavirus
(PA Graphics)

Regional Differences
  • In the east of England, the growth rate has changed from between minus 5% and minus 1% to minus 3%-zero. The R number remains unchanged from last week at 0.8-1.
  • In London, the growth rate is between minus 2% and plus 1%, compared to between minus 4% and zero last week. The capital has seen the R value change from 0.8-1 to 0.9-1.1.
  • The Midlands has a growth rate of minus 4% to zero, compared with between minus 5% and minus 1% last week. Its R value is unchanged at 0.8-1.
  • In the North East and Yorkshire, the growth rate remains unchanged since last week and is somewhere between minus 4% and zero. Its R number is 0.8-1.
  • The growth rate in the North West is between minus 2% and plus 1%, a slight change from between minus 3% and plus 1%. The R value here is 0.9-1.1.
  • In the South East, the growth rate is between minus 4% and zero, compared with between 5% and minus 1% last week. The R value in the region is 0.8-1.0.
  • The South West has a growth rate of minus 1% to plus 2%, compared to between minus 5% and plus 1% last week. Its R value is above one, with a range of 0.8-1.1.

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop


The Canary Fund us
  • Show Comments
    1. 1. Why should we trust SAGE?
      2. Case numbers increase because more (unreliable) testing is being done.
      3. A ‘positive’ test may be a false positive – so we don’t really know how many genuine infections there are. In Germany the number of tests had risen to nearly 900,000 by 10 August – but the rate of positive tests remained under 1% (and was even falling) – and had been under 1% since 1st June, with only one exception in the second week of June. Since it appears that the same (unreliable) test is being used in both countries I see no reason to suspect that the percentage of ‘positives’ in the UK is significantly different.
      4. The Excess Mortality figures (EUROMOMO) reveal that there has been no excess mortality in England or Scotland since early June (week 24).

      What is the justification for the prolonged restrictions?

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.