‘Green’ investment funds are supporting fossil fuels, a new report finds
Major financial firms that publicly support efforts to limit the climate crisis have made billions of dollars of investments in the world’s largest fossil fuels companies. A report, published by think tank Carbon Tracker on 5 May, found that these included products marketed as ‘green’.
Billions invested in fossil fuels
The analysis found that 25 members of the Net Zero Asset Managers’ initiative (NZAM) have a combined $417 billion in holdings in 15 oil and gas firms. These included ExxonMobil and TotalEnergies. The Canary’s Hannah Sharland reported:
TotalEnergies announced staggering profits of $6.5bn for the first three months of 2023. Meanwhile, the nonprofit Business & Human Rights Resource Centre (BHRRC) revealed that in 2022, TotalEnergies was one of the five worst companies for projects linked to attacks against human rights defenders.
Carbon Tracker found that last year many of these asset managers even increased their exposure to the fossil fuel sector, which has seen profits surge as a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
On the other hand, it said none of the 15 fossil fuel giants it focused on have activities and businesses aligned with the Paris Agreement. The climate deal, made in 2015, committed 194 national governments to a goal of limiting warming to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels
US asset management giant BlackRock topped the list of firms signed up to NZAM. It had exposure to all 15 oil and gas firms, with investments totalling $116bn last year, according to Carbon Tracker.
‘They risk their reputation’
Carbon Tracker looked at a total of 90 asset managers in the report. It warned that many had products that risked misleading investors and greenwashing, and highlighted BlackRock’s ACS (Authorised Contractual Scheme) Climate Transition World Equity Fund. The fund claims to:
Read on...
maximise the opportunities and minimise the potential risks associated with a transition to a low-carbon economy.
However, Carbon Tracker said the fund has $219m invested in 10 of the 15 fossil fuel companies.
Overall, the analysis found that more than 160 funds specifically marketed with the labels “ESG” (environmental, social and governance), “sustainable”, “climate”, “carbon” and “transition” hold $4.6bn of investments in the 15 oil and gas companies.
Report author Maeve O’Connor – Carbon Trackers’ associate analyst of oil, gas and mining – said:
Asset managers that join coalitions such as the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative are signalling to the market that they will invest in line with the Paris target of holding global warming to 1.5C
If they invest in oil and gas companies that are not aligned with this target, they risk their reputation among climate-conscious asset owners while other investors may increasingly be concerned over exposure to energy transition risk.
Featured image by Wikimedia Commons/Grahame C. Anderson, via CC 4.0, resized to 770×403
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
Yay! Capitalism! If so-called Green campaigners accept the global capitalist system as the inevitable background to everything we do, and try to make it somehow greener, that will inevitably fail. The economic growth model on which investment firms rely was, and is, the main driver of climate change. Demanding that those firms avoid what makes them the most money is unlikely to work.