• Donate
  • Login
Friday, June 5, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

Brexit just buried a DWP scandal

Steve Topple by Steve Topple
1 February 2020
in Analysis, UK
Reading Time: 4 mins read
164 10
A A
6
Home UK Analysis
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is caught up in another scandal. This time, it involves its contentious assessments. But it appears the story is getting lost amid Brexit.

DWP assessments

On Saturday 1 February, the Daily Record published a story on DWP assessments. These are where the department sends claimants to a private company. It then looks at the person’s health to decide if they can get social security. There are two types of assessments.

  • The Work Capability Assessment (WCA) is for Universal Credit and Employment and Support Allowance (ESA).
  • Health assessments are for Personal Independence Payments.

The assessments are contentious. For example, Independent Assessment Service (IAS), formally ATOS, does Personal Independence Payment (PIP) health assessments for the DWP.  But the company has been dogged by controversy. From probes into “dishonest” assessments to high rates of appeal wins, IAS has often been under fire. As The Canary recently reported, complaints to the DWP about IAS have shot up by more than 1,400% since 2013.

And now the Daily Record has revealed more damning evidence about these assessments.

A fresh scandal?

As it reported, when one of the private companies does an assessment, it sends its paperwork to the DWP. But then, the department ‘secretly’ audits these. And the Daily Record revealed some startling figures to do with IAS.

It found that the DWP:

  • Audited 11,760 IAS assessments last year.
  • The DWP “amended” 1,840 of these.
  • It found 460 of them “unacceptable”.
‘Brazen’

The Daily Record gave the example of one claimant. As it reported:

a Scot with multiple sclerosis and mental health problems was accidentally sent before-and-after copies of his assessment…

The paperwork had been submitted by a health professional after a face-to-face meeting, but was then secretly audited by officials without any follow up conversation.

Both versions were sent back, showing he would have qualified for additional support until his scores were lowered.

The altered copy removed a nurse’s observation that the man needed help to prepare a simple meal. References to his top being on inside out were removed.

The original said he has regular specialist input while the audit brazenly stated he has none.

The DWP says…

The DWP told the Daily Record:

We are absolutely committed to ensuring people receive the support they are entitled to.

That is why assessments are carried out by qualified health professionals and we continue to work with them to ensure quality is continuously improving.

Sometimes assessment reports are returned to providers to ensure we have as much information as possible to reach an accurate decision.

But all this comes against a backdrop of a disability ‘clamp-down’ by the DWP.

Who’s to blame?

It’s hard to know if the assessment company is at fault, or if it’s the DWP. As Disability News Service (DNS) reported, in 2018/19, more than 36% of IAS assessments were “substandard”. This could indicate IAS is at fault.

But also in 2018/19, tribunals upheld 73% of claimant’s PIP appeals. The DWP would be to blame for this, as it makes the final decision on a person’s PIP claim. Moreover, over half a million people won these between 2013 and 2018. And as DNS also reported in December 2019:

figures, released the day after the election, show that new claimants are 21 per cent less likely to be awarded… (PIP) than they were last year.

So, there appears to be equal chaos at both the private companies and the DWP. But ultimately, it’s claimants who suffer.

“An outrage”

Campaigner and disability rights activist Paula Peters is furious. She told The Canary:

It’s an absolute outrage & travesty that the DWP are marking down PIP assessments and denying thousands of disabled people the support they are entitled to. It causes them further distress and plunges yet more disabled people further into poverty. This needs a thorough investigation and staff responsible held to account.

Stop the assessments

Between April 2013 and 30 April 2018, almost 12 people a day died. They were waiting for the DWP to make a decision on PIP claims. The chaos with assessments must surely just delay people’s claims. And at worst, these deaths are the end result. During the 2019 general election, Labour pledged to bring DWP assessments “in-house”. But the department is responsible for many of the failings with these assessments. So, giving it overall control would solve little. The whole, disastrous system needs an overhaul. And the DWP needs to stop putting sick and disabled people through assessments in the first place.

Featured image via George Hodan – PublicDomainPictures and Wikimedia 

Tags: BrexitConservative PartyDepartment for Work and Pensions (DWP)disability
Share129Tweet81ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Police upped Calais refugee camp clearances in a ‘horrible’ week before Brexit

Next Post

Victory for a murdered solicitor’s family in the High Court underlines the importance of human rights law in Brexit UK

Next Post
Finucane commemoration & European Court hammer

Victory for a murdered solicitor's family in the High Court underlines the importance of human rights law in Brexit UK

Two hands touching combating loneliness

As the UK fractures, one Twitter thread should be essential reading

If Johnson can't get his own way in EU negotiations, a rebranded no-deal looms

No pasaran

Brexit-fuelled nationalism is only one step removed from fascism. It has to be confronted. Now.

Johnson’s government must get its ‘house in order’ ahead of crucial climate talks

Johnson's government must get its 'house in order' ahead of crucial climate talks

Comments 6

  1. jeff3 says:
    6 years ago

    It’s called culling the stock through benefits denial aktion T4 rolling along with out much of a ado

    Reply
  2. royjenkins284 says:
    6 years ago

    Brexit just buried a DWP scandal
    ////
    Just some question + points here to all claimants
    On any benefits? I would like input back please.
    Q-1
    Have you tried prosecuting the Minister of D.W.P.?
    Personally, for withheld benefits money yes or no?
    P-1
    You can by law prosecute the Boss (Minister in this case)
    or person responsible for enforcing the rules in a firm or Govt DEPT (Not prosecute the all’ of D.W.P. Govt Dept)
    Q-2
    Has any benefit person prosecuted the Minister ONLY?
    For the loss of income plus the stress you all suffered while applying for your money or any Benefits payments.
    P-2
    If the Minister of the Govt is held personally held to account for withholding your lifeline (or income) you need to live off (I suspect payment would or could be)
    faster returned to claimant in a court of law if the D.W.P. Minister alone was prosecuted for their mistakes in the job as Govt Minister for D.W.P. dept.
    (i.e. the boss off running it)
    P-2
    I think the law is already in place to prosecute the Boss of firms or a Dept that is making wrong decision and costing lives so the same law can be used to prosecute the D.W.P. Minister as a person only in-charge of D.W.P.(i.e. the boss)
    Of a privet run serves.
    (D.W.P. is a privet firm running a serve’s for Tory Govt)
    The U-CREDIT was made up by privet firm Ministers or boss if you like not voted in to be used by public uses or residents if was conceived in a back room not put to the public at all by Boss or D.W.P.-Minister at the time)
    it was put together by rich personal Minister of D.W.P. dept this is a firm running the benefits for Tory Govt a paid member of Tory Govt. Also, an employee to us taxpayer as well Mr. Ian Duncan Smith, (U-Credit IS his mess)
    //
    So, I believe it’s about time claimants took privet prosecutions claims out on Minister of D.W.P. the Ministers of D.W.P. firm can possibly’ be prosecuted personally by any claimant in a court of law? By way of a privet prosecution to them only, so no taxpayer payer money can be used by Minister to defend their action. Then they will have to use their own cash to defend themselves as you are precaution the person (Minister) not Govt D.W.P. as they been being prosecuted personally Not D.W.P. Dept Or Govt parties so taxpayer,
    money should Not be used by the Minister of D.W.P.

    Reply
  3. themagicmancunian100 says:
    6 years ago

    Remember that the Nazi genocide was invented for disabled Germans. Only later was it used for genocide against the Jews. Where is the memorial to all the disabled slaughtered by the Nazis. Why does “The Holocaust industry” play down this slaughter, as well as that of the Romanies, Polish Catholics, socialists, communists….? It is no surprise a right-wing government should target the disabled. At the heart of their ideology nestles the reduction of society to nature: the disabled should be allowed to fail and suffer because that is what nature wants. Hitler was opposed to birth control for the same reason. Human dignity is a social matter. The disabled are part of us and we will support them to live the full and maximally independent lives they want, and to make their remarkable contributions to society and culture.

    Reply
  4. opinionated says:
    6 years ago

    Surely this is fraud? Tampering with evidence knowing the victim will lose out; how can it be anything else?

    Reply
  5. ArthurFallowfield says:
    6 years ago

    This is what we voted for. Why the surprise?

    Reply
  6. LisaMac says:
    6 years ago

    Never go to an assessment alone, always have a witness with you.
    PIP assessments can be recorded. Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) have recording kits available to borrow throughout the country.
    https://dpac.uk.net/2020/01/pip-assessment-recording-equipment-disability-sheffield/

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Composite image from individual portraits of the Heathrow Five
News

Heathrow Five lose appeal against convictions for planning protest that never happened

by The Canary
5 June 2026
FIFA World Cup 2022 — Joel Campbell cools off
Analysis

FIFA water ban sparks fan backlash ahead of 2026 World Cup

by Alaa Shamali
5 June 2026
home office
Analysis

Belfast human rights activist could be deported due to Home Office incompetence

by Robert Freeman
5 June 2026
the new internationalist
UK

New Internationalist launches £150k survival appeal

by The Canary
5 June 2026
de-banking
Skwawkbox

Jewish anti-genocide activist Greenstein suffers second ‘de-banking’ attack

by Skwawkbox
5 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart