Brexit just buried a DWP scandal

The DWP logo and the UK and EU flags
Support us and go ad-free

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is caught up in another scandal. This time, it involves its contentious assessments. But it appears the story is getting lost amid Brexit.

DWP assessments

On Saturday 1 February, the Daily Record published a story on DWP assessments. These are where the department sends claimants to a private company. It then looks at the person’s health to decide if they can get social security. There are two types of assessments.

  • The Work Capability Assessment (WCA) is for Universal Credit and Employment and Support Allowance (ESA).
  • Health assessments are for Personal Independence Payments.

The assessments are contentious. For example, Independent Assessment Service (IAS), formally ATOS, does Personal Independence Payment (PIP) health assessments for the DWP.  But the company has been dogged by controversy. From probes into “dishonest” assessments to high rates of appeal wins, IAS has often been under fire. As The Canary recently reported, complaints to the DWP about IAS have shot up by more than 1,400% since 2013.

And now the Daily Record has revealed more damning evidence about these assessments.

A fresh scandal?

As it reported, when one of the private companies does an assessment, it sends its paperwork to the DWP. But then, the department ‘secretly’ audits these. And the Daily Record revealed some startling figures to do with IAS.

It found that the DWP:

  • Audited 11,760 IAS assessments last year.
  • The DWP “amended” 1,840 of these.
  • It found 460 of them “unacceptable”.

The Daily Record gave the example of one claimant. As it reported:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

a Scot with multiple sclerosis and mental health problems was accidentally sent before-and-after copies of his assessment…

The paperwork had been submitted by a health professional after a face-to-face meeting, but was then secretly audited by officials without any follow up conversation.

Both versions were sent back, showing he would have qualified for additional support until his scores were lowered.

The altered copy removed a nurse’s observation that the man needed help to prepare a simple meal. References to his top being on inside out were removed.

The original said he has regular specialist input while the audit brazenly stated he has none.

The DWP says…

The DWP told the Daily Record:

We are absolutely committed to ensuring people receive the support they are entitled to.

That is why assessments are carried out by qualified health professionals and we continue to work with them to ensure quality is continuously improving.

Sometimes assessment reports are returned to providers to ensure we have as much information as possible to reach an accurate decision.

But all this comes against a backdrop of a disability ‘clamp-down’ by the DWP.

Who’s to blame?

It’s hard to know if the assessment company is at fault, or if it’s the DWP. As Disability News Service (DNSreported, in 2018/19, more than 36% of IAS assessments were “substandard”. This could indicate IAS is at fault.

But also in 2018/19, tribunals upheld 73% of claimant’s PIP appeals. The DWP would be to blame for this, as it makes the final decision on a person’s PIP claim. Moreover, over half a million people won these between 2013 and 2018. And as DNS also reported in December 2019:

figures, released the day after the election, show that new claimants are 21 per cent less likely to be awarded… (PIP) than they were last year.

So, there appears to be equal chaos at both the private companies and the DWP. But ultimately, it’s claimants who suffer.

“An outrage”

Campaigner and disability rights activist Paula Peters is furious. She told The Canary:

It’s an absolute outrage & travesty that the DWP are marking down PIP assessments and denying thousands of disabled people the support they are entitled to. It causes them further distress and plunges yet more disabled people further into poverty. This needs a thorough investigation and staff responsible held to account.

Stop the assessments

Between April 2013 and 30 April 2018, almost 12 people a day died. They were waiting for the DWP to make a decision on PIP claims. The chaos with assessments must surely just delay people’s claims. And at worst, these deaths are the end result. During the 2019 general election, Labour pledged to bring DWP assessments “in-house”. But the department is responsible for many of the failings with these assessments. So, giving it overall control would solve little. The whole, disastrous system needs an overhaul. And the DWP needs to stop putting sick and disabled people through assessments in the first place.

Featured image via George Hodan – PublicDomainPictures and Wikimedia 

Support us and go ad-free

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Brexit just buried a DWP scandal
      Just some question + points here to all claimants
      On any benefits? I would like input back please.
      Have you tried prosecuting the Minister of D.W.P.?
      Personally, for withheld benefits money yes or no?
      You can by law prosecute the Boss (Minister in this case)
      or person responsible for enforcing the rules in a firm or Govt DEPT (Not prosecute the all’ of D.W.P. Govt Dept)
      Has any benefit person prosecuted the Minister ONLY?
      For the loss of income plus the stress you all suffered while applying for your money or any Benefits payments.
      If the Minister of the Govt is held personally held to account for withholding your lifeline (or income) you need to live off (I suspect payment would or could be)
      faster returned to claimant in a court of law if the D.W.P. Minister alone was prosecuted for their mistakes in the job as Govt Minister for D.W.P. dept.
      (i.e. the boss off running it)
      I think the law is already in place to prosecute the Boss of firms or a Dept that is making wrong decision and costing lives so the same law can be used to prosecute the D.W.P. Minister as a person only in-charge of D.W.P.(i.e. the boss)
      Of a privet run serves.
      (D.W.P. is a privet firm running a serve’s for Tory Govt)
      The U-CREDIT was made up by privet firm Ministers or boss if you like not voted in to be used by public uses or residents if was conceived in a back room not put to the public at all by Boss or D.W.P.-Minister at the time)
      it was put together by rich personal Minister of D.W.P. dept this is a firm running the benefits for Tory Govt a paid member of Tory Govt. Also, an employee to us taxpayer as well Mr. Ian Duncan Smith, (U-Credit IS his mess)
      So, I believe it’s about time claimants took privet prosecutions claims out on Minister of D.W.P. the Ministers of D.W.P. firm can possibly’ be prosecuted personally by any claimant in a court of law? By way of a privet prosecution to them only, so no taxpayer payer money can be used by Minister to defend their action. Then they will have to use their own cash to defend themselves as you are precaution the person (Minister) not Govt D.W.P. as they been being prosecuted personally Not D.W.P. Dept Or Govt parties so taxpayer,
      money should Not be used by the Minister of D.W.P.

    2. Remember that the Nazi genocide was invented for disabled Germans. Only later was it used for genocide against the Jews. Where is the memorial to all the disabled slaughtered by the Nazis. Why does “The Holocaust industry” play down this slaughter, as well as that of the Romanies, Polish Catholics, socialists, communists….? It is no surprise a right-wing government should target the disabled. At the heart of their ideology nestles the reduction of society to nature: the disabled should be allowed to fail and suffer because that is what nature wants. Hitler was opposed to birth control for the same reason. Human dignity is a social matter. The disabled are part of us and we will support them to live the full and maximally independent lives they want, and to make their remarkable contributions to society and culture.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.