Brazilian President Michel Temer planned to open up a huge protected area of the Amazon rainforest to mining companies. Renca (the National Reserve of Copper and Associates) is roughly the size of Denmark, which led a political opponent to describe the decision as “the biggest attack on the Amazon of the last 50 years”.
But a Brazilian court has now blocked Temer’s plans after environmental campaigners voiced their outrage. Federal judge Rolando Valcir Spanholo stressed that the President, who is facing corruption charges, did not have the authority to dissolve Renca’s protections. Spanholo said that only congress could make this decision.
A win for the environment
The Brazilian government had made its priorities clear [Portuguese pdf] in March, when it said it wanted to abolish Renca to attract foreign investment. This is perhaps no surprise, given how appalling Temer’s track record is when it comes to conservation. Then, in June, Temer promised he would protect the Amazon rainforest, following pressure from supermodel Gisele Bündchen. The President announced [Portuguese] he would veto proposed legislation that would threaten the rainforest. But with the plan to abolish Renca still going ahead, it would be a stretch to say that Temer honestly cared about the environment.
After Temer announced his controversial plans for Renca, campaigners hit back. Christian Poirier of Amazon Watch said:
The abolition of Renca will wreak havoc on the forest and indigenous communities in the interests of the small group of economically powerful groups who are keeping Temer in power. This is the largest assault so far in a package of threats.
Mauricio Voivodic, executive director of WWF-Brazil, added:
A gold rush in the region will create irreversible damage to local cultures. In addition to demographic exploitation, deforestation, loss of biodiversity and water resources, this could lead to an intensification of land conflicts and threats to indigenous peoples and traditional populations.
The court has taken these concerns seriously, and has prioritised environmental interests over commercial ones. But this isn’t the end of the battle. With similar cases in the past, higher court judges have overturned decisions made by local judges.
The power of activism
This court decision shows that political leaders won’t always get their own way. Activism can be effective and impactful. And this is no small win for environmental campaigners, as protecting the Amazon rainforest is vital. There’s been a resurgence of deforestation in Brazil’s Amazon, which affects all of us, due to its extreme effect on global warming.
So we need to support environmental campaigners in Brazil, as their fight is also our fight.
Featured image via Wikimedia
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?