A local newspaper just skewered a council and a corporate giant

Sheffield City Council and the Yorkshire Post

A local newspaper has got a city council and a corporate giant bang to rights with its latest revelations on an ongoing saga.

The quietening of chainsaws?

Labour-led Sheffield City Council and its contractor Amey are chopping down public trees in the city. Local residents aren’t happy because of the environmental impact, the “Thatcherite” behaviour of the Labour council, and public health concerns.

The council paused the tree-felling programme on 26 March. As the Guardian reported, it said it was doing this because of:

the actions of a handful of people unlawfully entering the safety zones where tree replacement work is being carried out.

Despite the quietening of the chainsaws, the drama has continued. And now, the Yorkshire Post has forced the council to release the previously hidden contract between Amey and itself.

Sheffield City Council: flip-flopping

Sheffield City Council’s position on its tree-felling programme has repeatedly flip-flopped. As The Canary previously reported, the council claimed in a 2016 court case that it estimated just over 6,000 trees would need felling. It also accused campaigners of “exaggerated” claims that 10,000 trees faced the chop. But then, it released its ‘Tree Management Programme’ in March, which stated that:

The service provider [Amey] shall replace Highway Trees… at a rate of not less than 200 per year so that 17,500 Highway Trees are replaced by the end of the Term…

Read on...

The Yorkshire Post asked the council to conduct an “internal review” into why it was keeping the contract hidden. And the paper has now forced the council to release this document.

The mythical contract

As the Yorkshire Post reported:

The contract policy, which is less than two pages long, contains no mention of the so-called ‘6 Ds’ – the criteria the council had previously said is used for deciding whether to remove trees, assessing if they are deemed to be dead, dying, diseased, dangerous, damaging or ‘discriminatory’ in preventing wheelchairs and prams [from] using the pavement…

The contract policy focuses on what new saplings are suitable to be used as replacements, with one of the key considerations ‘minimising future maintenance requirements and nuisance’ – including a ‘preference for small leaves’ in choosing replacements.

It adds that ‘all tree replacement work shall be carried out in accordance with good arboricultural practice’…. It says that where felling is planned, ‘there shall be a period of consultation with residents to ensure they are fully aware of the replacement proposals and have sufficient opportunity to make comments or suggestions regarding the proposals’…

You can read the full contract here.

On the ropes

One of the key phrases in the contract is “minimising future maintenance requirements and nuisance”. This appears to validate what campaigners have always believed – that the tree felling was less about the environment, and more about long-term profit for Amey. As one campaigner noted:

Amey have a clear profit motive – if they blitz the city’s trees in the first five years of their 25-year contract, they can spend the next 20 years with much lower maintenance costs.

The Yorkshire Post‘s revelations add to a long line of headaches for the Labour-led council. As The Canary previously revealed, emails show South Yorkshire Police “taking orders” directly from Amey over its operations. Recently, The Canary also exposed how the council was running a surveillance operation against campaigners and residents; one which campaigners believe could be illegal.

Now, with these contract revelations, the council’s position is looking more and more precarious. It’s uncertain if, and how, the Labour-led authority will recover from this scandal.

Get Involved!

– Read more of The Canary‘s coverage on the Sheffield trees saga.

–You can also join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.

Featured image via the Yorkshire Post – screengrab and Sheffield City Council – screengrab 

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed