Aldi has lost an appeal over a planning application to open a new store in Birmingham. In what one campaigner called a “David and Goliath” battle, the local community won out. But the real victors in the case were both the trees that people were desperate to save from Aldi’s bulldozers, and local democracy.
Trampling over local democracy
As The Canary previously reported, Aldi made controversial plans for a new store on Old Horns Crescent in Great Barr, Birmingham. As BirminghamLive reported, the company originally submitted plans in 2016 for the supermarket which is on a ‘designated site of importance for nature conservation’. The area also contains trees which have protected status and is on the edge of the Queslett nature reserve.
In August 2016, Birmingham City Council planning officers heavily criticised the plans. Aldi shelved that set of plans before the council had a chance to reject them. And not to be beaten, it made a new set of plans and a second planning application to the council. The council promptly rejected that one as well. Local councillors called the site a “green lung for the city dealing with pollution” – noting that the existing trees “are much better at absorbing nitrogen dioxide”.
Undeterred, Aldi appealed to the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) over Birmingham City Council’s decision. Unfortunately for the supermarket giant, the government broadly agreed with Birmingham Council and community group Friends of Queslett Nature Reserve.
The government: right for a change
The government’s Planning Inspectorate made a number of points. It said that [pdf, p2]:
The site has a less managed appearance in contrast to the semi-ornamental plantings in and around neighbouring development… this serves to amplify their positive contribution to the local environment.
The inspectorate noted [pdf, p2-3] that while Aldi had said it would plant shrubs around the new building, this would not stop it being “highly visible”. This would be an “urbanisation” of the area.
It also noted [pdf, p3] that Aldi questioned the “short-term” protected nature of the trees. But the inspectorate said [pdf, p3] that just because the trees were subject to short-term protection only, it didn’t make them the “poor relation” to longer term protected ones.
Overall, the inspectorate said [pdf, p3-4] that the value of the trees:
arises from the contribution they make to the area’s character and appearance as a group rather than as individuals…
[The area] makes an important contribution to the local environment…
[Aldi’s plans] would have a significant adverse effect on the character and appearance of the area… Thus, it would not reinforce or create a positive sense of place and local distinctiveness, with design that corresponds to site conditions and the local area context.
Aldi told The Canary it did not wish to comment at this time.
Local community, 1. Aldi, 0.
Brenda Wilson from the Friends of Queslett Nature Reserve was “delighted”. She told The Canary:
This is a great day for the local community, for wildlife and the environment. It has been a two and a half year battle with Aldi and I hope now it has come to an end and we can move on.
In that time I have been astonished at the sheer bloody mindedness and dogged persistence of Aldi in their attempt at obtaining that piece of land at whatever the cost; even if meant destroying a woodland and desecrating wildlife habitat in the process. I was so proud of the way my community, local councillors and Birmingham City Council got together and made a stand against Aldi – a bit like David and Goliath.
David and Goliath
Little David, with nothing more than a sling and a shot, faced up to the big bully Goliath and took him out. This is just how ordinary working class people came out and protested and spoke up. They weren’t interested in two minutes of fame or being on the telly. They came out and said: ‘we want our trees, our nature reserve, our wildlife and a clean environment’.
Aldi, in their arrogance and the need for profit, were blinkered to the truth that in reality people are not easily bought. There are people out there who won`t sell their souls to greed and consumerism. This has proved that yet again there is good in humanity
Often, the government gets it wrong on matters of local planning; not least in the fracking industry. On this occasion, it appears that campaigners and local democracy have emerged victorious. And they’ve made sure the trees live to fight many another day.
– Support Friends of Queslett Nature Reserve on Twitter.
Featured image via Friends of Queslett Nature Reserve
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?