• Donate
  • Login
Friday, June 5, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

Aldi has just lost a ‘David and Goliath’ battle with a local community

Steve Topple by Steve Topple
24 May 2018
in Environment, Other News & Features
Reading Time: 4 mins read
164 9
A A
0
Home Other News & Features Environment
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

Aldi has lost an appeal over a planning application to open a new store in Birmingham. In what one campaigner called a “David and Goliath” battle, the local community won out. But the real victors in the case were both the trees that people were desperate to save from Aldi’s bulldozers, and local democracy.

Trampling over local democracy

As The Canary previously reported, Aldi made controversial plans for a new store on Old Horns Crescent in Great Barr, Birmingham. As BirminghamLive reported, the company originally submitted plans in 2016 for the supermarket which is on a ‘designated site of importance for nature conservation’. The area also contains trees which have protected status and is on the edge of the Queslett nature reserve.

In August 2016, Birmingham City Council planning officers heavily criticised the plans. Aldi shelved that set of plans before the council had a chance to reject them. And not to be beaten, it made a new set of plans and a second planning application to the council. The council promptly rejected that one as well. Local councillors called the site a “green lung for the city dealing with pollution” – noting that the existing trees “are much better at absorbing nitrogen dioxide”.

Undeterred, Aldi appealed to the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) over Birmingham City Council’s decision. Unfortunately for the supermarket giant, the government broadly agreed with Birmingham Council and community group Friends of Queslett Nature Reserve.

The government: right for a change

The government’s Planning Inspectorate made a number of points. It said that [pdf, p2]:

The site has a less managed appearance in contrast to the semi-ornamental plantings in and around neighbouring development… this serves to amplify their positive contribution to the local environment.

The inspectorate noted [pdf, p2-3] that while Aldi had said it would plant shrubs around the new building, this would not stop it being “highly visible”. This would be an “urbanisation” of the area.

It also noted [pdf, p3] that Aldi questioned the “short-term” protected nature of the trees. But the inspectorate said [pdf, p3] that just because the trees were subject to short-term protection only, it didn’t make them the “poor relation” to longer term protected ones.

Overall, the inspectorate said [pdf, p3-4] that the value of the trees:

arises from the contribution they make to the area’s character and appearance as a group rather than as individuals…

[The area] makes an important contribution to the local environment…

[Aldi’s plans] would have a significant adverse effect on the character and appearance of the area… Thus, it would not reinforce or create a positive sense of place and local distinctiveness, with design that corresponds to site conditions and the local area context.

Aldi says…

Aldi told The Canary it did not wish to comment at this time.

Local community, 1. Aldi, 0.

Brenda Wilson from the Friends of Queslett Nature Reserve was “delighted”. She told The Canary:

This is a great day for the local community, for wildlife and the environment. It has been a two and a half year battle with Aldi and I hope now it has come to an end and we can move on.

In that time I have been astonished at the sheer bloody mindedness and dogged persistence of Aldi in their attempt at obtaining that piece of land at whatever the cost; even if meant destroying a woodland and desecrating wildlife habitat in the process. I was so proud of the way my community, local councillors and Birmingham City Council got together and made a stand against Aldi – a bit like David and Goliath.

David and Goliath

Wilson continued:

Little David, with nothing more than a sling and a shot, faced up to the big bully Goliath and took him out. This is just how ordinary working class people came out and protested and spoke up. They weren’t interested in two minutes of fame or being on the telly. They came out and said: ‘we want our trees, our nature reserve, our wildlife and a clean environment’.

Aldi, in their arrogance and the need for profit, were blinkered to the truth that in reality people are not easily bought. There are people out there who won`t sell their souls to greed and consumerism. This has proved that yet again there is good in humanity

Often, the government gets it wrong on matters of local planning; not least in the fracking industry. On this occasion, it appears that campaigners and local democracy have emerged victorious. And they’ve made sure the trees live to fight many another day.

Get Involved!

– Support Friends of Queslett Nature Reserve on Twitter.

Featured image via Friends of Queslett Nature Reserve 

Tags: DemocracyEnvironmentLabour Party
Share128Tweet80ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

A big progressive win shows it’s time for the Democrats to ditch centrism

Next Post

The SNP humiliates Jeremy Hunt after he makes a jaw-dropping claim about the NHS

Next Post
Chris Stephens and Jeremy Hunt NHS debate

The SNP humiliates Jeremy Hunt after he makes a jaw-dropping claim about the NHS

An elderly woman using a computer

Councils are 'screening millions of older people out of accessing benefits', says charity

The Environment Agency Logo and the Kirby Misperton fracking site

Once again a fracking firm has been caught breaching government regulations

A disgruntled-looking Boris Johnson and a crashed bi-plane

'Brexit plane' stranded as Johnson realises 'wishful thinking' isn't a viable fuel source

Rupa Huq MP

An MP lifts the lid on the racism she faces on a 'daily basis' working in Westminster

Sánchez
Skwawkbox

Sánchez must act against Spanish police after brutal attack on pensioner protester

by Skwawkbox
4 June 2026
Composite image showing Andy Burnham, Count Binface and Rob Kenyon in front of a street scene in Makerfield
Opinion

Count Binface Makerfield manifesto would stitch up Burnham

by John Ranson
4 June 2026
Starmer
Analysis

Starmer finds his backbone as he stands up to Elon Musk “interfering in our politics”

by Maddison Wheeldon
4 June 2026
Coutinho
Analysis

Shadow equalities minister wants any explanation other than racism for Black maternal deaths

by Alex/Rose Cocker
4 June 2026
Reform UK councillor Tom Pickup
Uncategorized

Reform promotes councillor linked to genocidal WhatsApp group

by Willem Moore
4 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart