Trophy hunters become the latest recipients of a coronavirus bailout

An elephant crying
Support us and go ad-free

There aren’t many upsides to the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic. But one of the few that do exist is that animals which hunters planned to gun down this year have received a brief respite.

Botswana’s government, however, has just snatched that reprieve from the elephants in its country. Because the authorities have announced an extension to the hunting season. For hunters and safari companies set to profit from the massacre, it’s welcome news.

For the elephants concerned, it’s a death sentence.

Saving the elephants’ skins

Botswana banned trophy hunting in 2013/14. As wildlife economist Ross Harvey recently pointed out in the Revelator, one of the reasons the country introduced a moratorium was because “excessive trophy hunting was considered among the potential causes of the decline” of the numbers of wildlife species. Due to the ban and other policies, such as arming anti-poaching units, the country became one of Africa’s last safe havens for these magnificent creatures. Botswana is home to around a third of Africa’s remaining wild elephants.

Former president Ian Khama brought in those protections for wildlife. But another president came along in 2018 and undid them. Khama’s successor Mokgweetsi Masisi disarmed the anti-poaching units quickly, without explanation. Lifting the trophy hunting ban took more time. But 2020 was due to be the first season, after holding hunting auctions earlier this year. Masisi’s government has allocated the ‘sell off’ of 272 elephants for hunting in 2020. Commenting on the figures, Khama said:

 No scientific work was done on numbers to hunt or places to do so.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

But then coronavirus hit the world. To the relief of many opponents of the slaughter and the dismay of hunters and safari companies set to enjoy or profit from the killing, it looked like Botswana’s first elephant hunting season would be cancelled. Nature’s devastating virus was to save the elephants’ skins, literally.

The price of everything and the value of nothing

But Masisi’s government has chosen to extend the hunting season. In an update on coronavirus measures in the country, seen by The Canary, the Ministry of Environment, Natural Resources Conservation and Tourism said:

The hunting season will be extended until December 2020. The decision will be reviewed in light of developments on COVID 19 and if necessary, extended…

Masisi’s government has championed bringing back hunting as a way to control elephant populations and human/elephant conflict. However, wildlife conservation writer Jared Kukura wrote in the Wild Things Initiative that a study by Botswanan professor Joseph Mbaiwa “proved crucial in winning over support for a reversal of the hunting ban”. Kukura said that Mbaiwa is a business partner of US hunter and safari owner Jeff Rann, who “won two elephant hunting packages” for 2020. Kukura clarified:

If you’re following along, we have a scientist, whose study was influential in overturning a hunting ban, directly profiting from the decision

A number of conservationists disagree with the government’s assessment, arguing that there are non-lethal ways of ensuring communities have a peaceful and advantageous relationship with elephants. Meanwhile, Harvey pointed out that:

each elephant contributes to the dynamics of the ecosystem and improves the functionality of forests and savannahs as effective carbon sinks. A whole host of other species depend on elephants’ movements, which create forest corridors and shape the habitat. Elephant droppings fertilize forests and savannas and carry seeds to new locations…

And then there’s the value to people. A 2014 report estimated that elephants are each worth more than $1.6 million in ecotourism alone. Purchasing an elephant at an auction for $39,000 and selling it on to a trophy hunter for $85,000, therefore, seems not only ethically callous but economically senseless.

Missed opportunities

The debate around trophy hunting and its value (or not) to conservation is a contentious one. But the coronavirus pandemic, which has stopped this killing industry in its tracks, has provided a window of opportunity to focus on alternatives to it. Such a search for alternatives is arguably vital, because it’s unlikely that this pandemic will be the world’s last. So pandemic-resistant, climate-crisis-resistant options – meaning alternatives that don’t depend on lethal or non-lethal tourism – for conserving species and supporting the communities they co-exist with are a must.

Masisi has rejected that chance by extending the season. While the hunting fraternity will be rubbing their bloody hands with glee at the decision, it gives few others reason to rejoice – least of all the 272 doomed elephants and their families.

Featured image via pixabay – ArtTower

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop

 

The Canary Fund us
  • Show Comments
    1. Good ‘ol Tracey…still waiving the animal rights banner for Harvey. Top marks for persistence if not for accuracy.
      President Masisi’s decision to resume and extremely limited number of elephants was a direct response to his people in the North who are most affected by by the burgeoning numbers of elephants that have begun invading villages looking for water and food. They kill people (32 in the last couple of years), devastate people’s food supply, prevent people going out after dark and stop people sending children to school.
      With hunting prohibited, people affected by elephants begin to hate them, and then they turn a blind eye to poachers who will attend to the problem for them. The problem with poachers is that they kill rhinos, too. Worse still, they poison the carcasses to kill vultures that give them away.
      So, the President has sold a limited number of hunting licences. The money will be used to compensate villagers affected by elephants and show that something is being done about the problem. With compensation and jobs assisting hunters available, plus a large volume of valuable protein, elephants should once again have value and make poachers unwelcome, in turn protecting rhinos and vultures.
      It is all about practical field management of these magnificent creatures.

    2. Control of numbers is a non argument as justification for sport or personal gain. There are more humane ways of approaching any issues such as this. All animals should be treated with dignity and respect.

    3. There is no valid excuse for treating another species in this way.
      The world must learn that you do not solve problems with guns and an entirely different method of interaction with nature has to become the norm before it is too late.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.