Science deniers: Meet the four men in Trump’s Cabinet that have environmentalists scared

UN environment chief Erik Solheim recently said he was “concerned that some elite American politicians deny science”. This was in response to a question about Trump’s Cabinet appointments. Indeed, Trump has put four men in positions of influence and power that have many environmentalists scared.

Scott Pruitt (EPA Administrator)

Christine Todd Whitman, former head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under George W. Bush, is very worried about Scott Pruitt heading the agency.

Attorney General of the oil and gas-intensive state of Oklahoma, Pruitt is a strong critic of the EPA, which he will now be in charge of.

He has previously said the debate on climate change is “far from settled”. And he even joined a coalition in suing the EPA over its Clean Power Plan, which aims to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the electricity sector. He also sued the agency over plans to reduce emissions of methane from the oil and gas sector. On top of that, he sued the EPA again over its Clean Water Rule, which aims to protect clean drinking water nationwide.

Pruitt believes the EPA has an “out-of-control anti-energy agenda” and has “unnecessary” regulations. As May Boeve, executive director of 350.org, said:

You couldn’t pick a better fossil fuel industry puppet. Pruitt formed a secret alliance with oil and coal companies to gut our environmental regulations and has defended ExxonMobil’s climate cover-up.

This “cover up” refers to gas and oil giant ExxonMobil misleading investors and the public about the dangers of climate change. Allegedly, ExxonMobil scientists knew as far back as 1977 that the release of CO2 from the burning of fossil fuels was influencing the global climate. But they failed to disclose this. And Pruitt was one of the attorneys who defended ExxonMobil, saying:

Read on...

Reasonable minds can disagree about the science behind global warming, and disagree they do.

Except 97% of climate scientists do agree about the role of human activity in global warming.

Rex Tillerson (Secretary of State)

Trump picked Rex Tillerson, chief executive of ExxonMobil, as Secretary of State. Bear in mind, this is a company still under investigation for twisting and hiding facts about climate change to suit its own agenda. It has also funded thinktanks that spread climate change denial.

And Tillerson has made some worrying comments about climate change himself. In response to an interviewer’s concerns about the consequences of burning fossil fuels, he said:

…we will adapt to this. Changes to weather patterns that move crop production areas around… we’ll adapt to that. It’s an engineering problem, and it has engineering solutions. And so… the fear factor that people want to throw out there to say we just have to stop this, I do not accept.

He has also argued that severe weather events “may or may not be induced by climate change”. This is in spite of studies showing that extreme weather conditions are on the increase due to man-made climate change.

Rick Perry (Energy Secretary)

Former Texas governor Rick Perry will now lead the Energy Department, which in the past he wanted to scrap. He has called climate change a “contrived, phony mess” and a “secular carbon cult”. During a 2011 presidential debate, he infamously forgot the name of the Department of Energy. Which he will now be the head of.

And he is a strong denier of science. In his book Fed Up!, he wrote that “we have been experiencing a cooling trend”. But the figures don’t bear that out. Also, top environmental officials in Perry’s Texas administration censored references to climate change in an official state report.

Ryan Zinke (Interior Secretary)

The latest climate change sceptic added to Trump’s Cabinet is Montana congressman, Ryan Zinke. Zinke will lead the Department of Interior, which draws up policy affecting national parks, wildlife refuges and endangered species.

He has claimed that climate change is not “settled science” and believes there is no scientific evidence to suggest that fracking is environmentally dangerous. Which goes against previous EPA conclusions. He also said that:

the evidence strongly suggests that humans have had an influence on higher CO2. However, the evidence is equally as strong that there are other factors, such as rising ocean temperatures, that have a greater influence.

However, climate change expert Steve Running, from the University of Montana, said in response:

We can say quite confidently that 90 to 95 percent of this carbon trend is human induced… A tiny fraction is natural variability.

He has called for an expansion of West Coast coal export terminals, stopping proposed EPA policies which aim to cut carbon pollution, and extracting natural gas. He also recently criticised an Interior Department rule about curbing methane emissions from oil and gas operations as “unnecessary”.

Kieran Suckling, executive director of the Center for Biological Diversity, said Zinke’s:

brief political career has been substantially devoted to attacking endangered species and the Endangered Species Act.

Concerns

Environmentalists have deep concerns about the agendas and vested interests of these four men. Recently, climate scientists protested against the proliferation of science denial in the Trump team. And we should all be just as worried as they are. These four men are not just promoting wrong-headed ideas. They are threatening the collective effort that is necessary to prevent climate catastrophe.

Get Involved!

– Support ClimateTruth and check out the EPA’s page on climate change.

Featured image via John Englart/Flickr

In text images via Flickr / Archive of the Russian Government / Flickr / Flickr

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed