The government’s plan to catch ‘illegal’ schoolchildren is even worse than we thought [TWEETS]

Support us and go ad-free

In October, The Canary reported on new requirements for schools to gather information on the country of birth and nationality of pupils. Some schools were demanding proof in the form of birth certificates and passport numbers, as critics warned against allowing schools to become “mini-immigration offices”. But new evidence suggests that those fears were entirely justified.

The census

Parents expressed concern after receiving texts and letters demanding their children’s details:

This was a last minute follow-up to a letter the school had sent out earlier:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Schools around the country sent out their own versions of the letter, and the response from parents was generally a mixture of surprise and concern, with some querying whether this could be an early symptom of Brexit.

The campaign group Against Borders for Children called on parents to boycott the data collection process and wrote a letter, supported by over 20 organisations, to Education Secretary Justine Greening. The boycott was a protest against the perceived discrimination in the census. Education magazine Schools Week discovered that some schools were sending different messages home depending on the colour of children’s skin, with non-white people having passport details demanded as a matter of urgency.

At the heart of the issue were the changes which the government made to the school census for 2016. The new data items (1.4 on page 10 of the guidelines [pdf]) included proficiency in English, country of birth, and nationality. Ethnicity data, which used to be limited to over-5s, now had to be gathered for all ages, including nursery school children.

The hidden agenda

Tim Colbourne, the parent who received the eleventh-hour text, had a particular perspective on these changes, given his former role as ex-Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg’s deputy chief of staff:

And it seems now that he was absolutely right. Documents obtained through Freedom of Information requests (FOI) have confirmed that the government precisely intended to “create a hostile environment” for illegal migrants. Education officials had an agreement to share the details of up to 1,500 pupils a month with the Home Office. The Department for Education (DfE) claimed in public that the census would help it allocate resources. Yet the agreement makes clear that “strategic aims” of the data-sharing include helping the Home Office track down migrant families it has ‘lost’ and reducing the overall population of ‘illegal migrants’.

May’s fingerprints

Martha Spurrier, director of Liberty, said the strategy “is a secret government programme that turns the Department for Education into a border control force”. She added: “This has Theresa May’s fingerprints all over it.”

But Schools Week editor Laura McInerney pointed out in October that parents actually have the right to refuse the information being demanded of them. There is a category of answer which schools can submit, where the information is not supplied. She made her position clear:

Schools should not make parents show their children’s passports. For anything.

That’s a really simple rule. It’s also a rule the Department for Education won’t write that clearly. I don’t know why. But it should.

She called on headteachers to ensure that passport details are not collected and that apologies are issued if such demands have been mistakenly made in the past. She is not opposed to all data collection. In fact, she supports it where there is a clear benefit for educational analysis. But this must be carried out in a sensitive and, above all, optional manner if schools are to avoid becoming “mini-immigration offices”. The census is next due on 19 January 2017. Hopefully, schools will realise its real purpose and refuse to comply.

Get Involved!

– Against Borders for Children has a template letter if you wish to contact your MP.

– Speak to your local school to make sure they know that parents can refuse to answer.

– Read more Canary articles about education.

– Consider supporting The Canary if you appreciate what we do.

Featured image via Pixnio

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed