A new report describes Britain’s latest coal mine as ‘illegitimate’

Excavator working at Bradley mine on 20/06/2018
Glen Black

A new report criticises work on Britain’s newest open-cast coal mine. Despite the mine’s owner, as well as the local council, allowing construction to go ahead, DeSmog UK has questioned the “legitimacy” of the work.

Premature work

The investigative media outlet, which is focused on climate change and environmental issues, visited the site on 20 June. And it concluded that, more than two weeks after work began, the site is still failing to meet planning conditions.

In its report, DeSmog UK details a number of issues that could mean owner Banks Mining is “illegitimately commencing work”. These include:

Start your day with The Canary News Digest

Fresh and fearless; get excellent independent journalism from The Canary, delivered straight to your inbox every morning.
  • Lack of signage at the site except for security notices
  • Unfinished street lighting for the access road
  • Large gaps in fencing around the site
  • An excavator operating atop a mound “perilously close” to a public pathway

These appear to break a number of conditions found in an appeal decision [pdf] made by the Planning Inspectorate on 3 June 2015. DeSmog UK’s report says these issues include:

requirements to provide details of the site fencing (condition 5H), site notice board (5N), and the layout of the site compound (5L). Further conditions range from the dust control (5D) to Noise monitoring (5B).

Continue reading below...

Summary table from DeSmog UK's report

Breaching such conditions could result in an injunction against Banks Mining by Durham County Council. But the council appears to disagree.

Council response

Following the site visit, DeSmog UK approached Durham County Council with its concerns. Stuart Timmins, head of planning and assets, said:

We are content that the works currently being carried out on site are in accordance with the planning permission.

But when pressed on the details of what DeSmog UK saw, the local authority declined to comment. It said the questions should be submitted as a Freedom of Information (FOI) request. But an FOI request gives the council up to 20 days to respond. DeSmog UK says it has submitted these requests but that this process provides the Banks Group:

with a further month to continue work unchallenged. And BBC research shows that requesting sensitive information through FOI’s is riddled with problems, with authorities using a variety of tactics to avoid disclosing crucial information.

Access road

Opposition to Bradley mine reached a peak between 1 and 3 June. Activists at the time carried out a series of lock-ons to prevent construction of an access road to the mine site. Campaign to Protect Pont Valley claimed a “massive achievement” when the road, which it said was a requirement in the planning permission, wasn’t built before a 3 June deadline.

DeSmog UK’s report also reveals soil stripping work at the site began in May. This contravenes a requirement in the Section 106 planning agreement.

Extract from Section 106 planning permission

But on 5 June, Durham County Council told the Northern Echo that Banks Mining’s planning permission had been activated. Planning development manager Stephen Reed said:

The developer has met all of the conditions required by the planning permission and, therefore, permission is active and the extraction of coal at the site is entirely legal. The company is required to create a protected right hand turn onto the site but this is through a separate 106 agreement which does not directly affect planning permission.

Featured image via Russell Scott (used with permission)

Additional images courtesy of DeSmog UK

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support

Comments are closed