Members of the Labour Party have written to Jeremy Corbyn to officially oppose claims that outspoken critics of Israel are antisemitic. With particular reference to former Momentum Vice-Chair Jackie Walker, they also free others like Ken Livingstone of the charge, stating exactly why:
We are writing to you as members of the Labour Party. We are a predominantly Jewish group and are writing to ask you to review your behaviour on the question of Israel/Palestine. We understand that amongst reasons given by the Labour Party for claiming that Jackie Walker, the ex-Deputy Chair of Momentum, is antisemitic, the following are included:
- Regularly posting on Israel
- Describing Israel as a racist state
- A pattern of behaviour that causes offence to some members
- Claiming that there is an antisemitism witch-hunt
- Claiming that there is Israeli involvement in British politics
- Saying the Right of the party is using this witch-hunt for political purposes
- Saying adoption of IHRA definition of antisemitism is an attempt to outlaw criticism of Israel and to silence pro-Palestinian voices
We would therefore like to let you know that we… too are ‘guilty’ of such charges, not because we are antisemitic but because we believe these to be reasonable statements, accurately describing Israel’s policies and actions.
The signatories go on to list that they regularly post on Israel and Palestine; describe Israel as an apartheid state; bring light to numerous Israelis that hold similar views, including referred journalists; and state that offending people is unfortunately a by-product of politics.
Rooting out supporters of Palestinian rights
The group acknowledges that an antisemitism problem may exist. But it also says there’s an “antisemitism witch-hunt” in the Labour Party to single out anti-Zionists and supporters of Palestinian rights:
opponents of the Leader of the Party have used the campaign of antisemitism allegations to destabilise the leadership and have greatly damaged the party as [a] consequence. They have done this with impunity.
The signatories point to the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, which encompasses criticism of Israel. They say it is “employed to censor necessary, and proper, political and moral debate”.
And smear campaigns against groups which defend Palestinian rights are nothing new. One such example is the Palestinian Return Centre. After newspapers misreported on a meeting of the group, its associates were labelled as antisemitic. More recently, several media articles have smeared not-for-profit group MEND. In fact, even criticising Israel at the UN cannot withstand antisemitism accusations.
The 145 signatories of the letter finish off by saying:
We shall NOT give up on our right to free speech to criticise Israel, or for that matter, any other country which behaves illegally and immorally. We consider this to be our right and duty as progressive socialists.
In short, we must indeed fight antisemitism. But it is not antisemitic to criticise the Israeli state for its actions. And we shouldn’t forget that.
– Read more Canary articles on antisemitism.
Featured Image via Free Speech on Israel
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?