The current US government is moving closer to war with Iran, according to Lawrence Wilkerson, a former US Army colonel. The former George W Bush administration official was speaking to The Real News Network on 17 April.
Donald Trump has long had Iran in his sights. But on 8 April, he took the unprecedented step of labelling the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), a branch of the Iranian armed forces, a “terrorist organisation”. The Iranian government responded by labelling US Central Command a “terrorist organisation”.
Two days after Trump’s move, US secretary of state Mike Pompeo claimed there were “very real” connections between the Shia-Islam-dominated Iranian government with the Wahhabi-Islam fundamentalist al-Qaeda . The implication is that the White House could use the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force, which the US Congress passed to go after those who committed 9/11 attacks, to attack Iran; an idea that Senator Rand Paul completely rejected.
‘Setting the stage for war a with Iran’
Wilkerson said that Pompeo’s attempts to link al-Qaeda with Iran is one of the last building blocks:
in setting the stage for a war with Iran; for the use of military force against Iran.
Wilkerson served in three separate Republican administrations; those of Ronald Reagan, George H W Bush, and George W Bush. And he told The Canary that, during that time, he worked on national security affairs at the US Pacific Command, with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the State Department.
‘There is almost no contact between Iran and Al Qaeda’
my experience, as well as my research over the last 15 years in academia, leads me to believe… there is almost no contact [between Iran and al-Qaeda].
There have been times where al-Qaeda might have made overtures to the Iranian government or to parts of that government, like the Quds Force or IRGC, but they’ve always been rebuffed
The “greatest state sponsor of terrorism” in the Middle East is not Iran, but Western ally Saudi Arabia
He also noted Iran’s “fierce attacks on the terrorists groups in Syria” and that “Iran itself has been attacked by terrorist groups”, often with the support of the Saudi government and Pakistan’s ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence).
Wilkerson summarised that:
Iran has been a receptor… of terrorist attacks just like the United States, Europe, and other places have been. So Iran is not a sponsor of terrorism.
And he concluded, as The Canary has outlined previously:
The greatest state sponsor of terrorism in the region, and indeed in the world, is Saudi Arabia—our ally.
In fact, after the 9/11 attacks, the Iranian government made repeated overtures to the US, offering its support in targeting al-Qaeda and toppling the Taliban in Afghanistan. But the US ultimately labelled Iran part of its “axis of evil”.
The march towards war
In 2015, Barack Obama warned that “Without a [nuclear] deal [with Iran] we risk even more war in the Middle East”. For that reason, many saw this deal as Obama’s crowning achievement. In May 2018, however, Trump unilaterally withdrew from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPoA) (aka the Iran Nuclear Deal); and re-imposed harsh sanctions on Iran. Obama had previously admitted that these sanctions had “helped to cripple” the Iranian economy. The British, French, and German governments rejected the move, saying that the International Atomic Energy Agency:
has confirmed in 12 consecutive reports that Iran is abiding by its commitments under the Agreement.
Wilkerson argued that national security adviser John Bolton (a key advocate of the invasion of Iraq) was actually ‘orchestrating‘ most of Trump’s policies towards Iran. So while Trump may claim he’s just pushing for a “better deal”, warmongers like Bolton – who have long had Iran in their sights – may be deliberately pushing for war.
US empire’s ‘hit list’
In 2007, former NATO commander Wesley Clark explained[13:47] that a few weeks after the 9/11 attacks, a US government official told[13:51-14:19] him about a secret ‘hit list’ of countries the Bush administration planned to “take out”:
starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran
Iran is out of control… It’s supposed to be a US client state, as it was under the Shah. And it’s refusing to play that role.
If we oppose both the sanctions and potential military conflict with Iran, we need to speak up now – before it’s too late.
Featured image via The Real News Network-YouTube
- In the US: you can write a concise and respectful message to your congressperson asking them to oppose sanctions against Iran support a US re-entrance into the Iran Nuclear Deal, making note of the joint statement by the UK, France and Germany.
- In the UK: you can write a concise and respectful message to your MP so they’re aware of your opposition to US sanctions on Iran and support for the Iran Nuclear Deal.
Do your bit for independent journalism
Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.
We need you to help out, if you can.
When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.
You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.
In return you get:
- Advert free reading experience
- Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
- 20% discount from our shop