On 7 November, a man who risked his life to travel to fight Daesh (ISIS/ISIL) was imprisoned for “terrorism“. His sentence highlights the injustice of listing the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) as a terrorist organisation.
Fighting ‘against the sick regime and ideologies of Daesh
[Fight] side by side with brothers in arms against the sick regime and ideologies of the so-called Daesh [Isis] and other Islamic extremists
The jury did not find that attending a military training organised by the YPG in Syria was enough to find James guilty of terrorism. However, he was found guilty of attending a training in Makhmour camp in neighbouring Iraqi Kurdistan and sentenced to 12 months in prison. The judge found that James had received military training at a “PKK base”.
He was also sentenced to three years in prison for possession of cocaine with intent to supply. The drugs had been found after police searched his home because of statements he had made about his intention to travel to Syria.
James has been in prison on remand since he returned to the UK last February so has already served the majority of his time in prison
The court found James not guilty of receiving YPG training in Syria, and even complimented him for it. According to judge Edis:
The force for which you were being trained was defensive force against a lethal and genocidal threat from ISIS.
But, in defiance of all reason, Aidan was imprisoned for allegedly receiving PKK weapons training at the Makhmour camp. That training was clearly given for the same purpose as the YPG training – in order to equip him to fight against the genocidal threat from Daesh.
So what was this camp that James was imprisoned for going to? According to Edis:
On the way to Syria you spent a month in the refugee camp at Makhmour in Iraq which is a place where, on any view, the PKK was in a strong position. Indeed, had they not been there in force to defend it they would have been abandoning over 12,000 Kurds to potential slaughter by ISIS.
Nik Matheou of London Kurdistan Solidarity told The Canary:
Makhmour refugee camp has existed since the early 1990s when the Turkish state was committing war crimes, expelling Kurds from their villages and not allowing large numbers of Kurds who had fled across the border to Iraq to return… The [PKK] provides all the basic necessities for people in order to live [in the camp].
British terror legislation benefits Turkish state terrorism
The PKK was established in Turkey in the 1970s and has struggled for Kurdish autonomy since then. Since the 1980s, the PKK has intermittently been involved in armed struggle against the Turkish state.
As the Canary has previously reported, the PKK:
there will be no peace between Turkey and the Kurds until is released, you cannot negotiate a peace while the leader of the other side is in prison… He’s been asking for peace, it was Turkey who broke off all those peace negotiations in 2015.
European courts do not view the PKK as a terrorist group
In April 2019, Mohamed Elmaazi wrote for The Canary:
In a landmark decision, the Belgian Court of Last Resort recently decided that the Kurdish PKK (in Turkey) is a “party to an armed conflict” and not a “terrorist organisation”. The decision is especially significant because it means that terrorism laws can no longer be used against Kurdish people in Belgium simply for supporting the PKK. And it’s yet another legal move which calls into question the hostile stance towards the PKK of governments like the UK’s.
The Belgian court’s decision in March 2019 is in line with another recent ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). In November 2018, the CJEU determined that it was wrong for the Council of Europe to list the PKK resistance group as a terrorist organisation from 2014 to 2017.
But no similar rulings have been made in Britain, and the PKK remains on the list of banned groups.
Criminalising the Kurdish community
Matheou told The Canary that banning the PKK criminalises the Kurdish community:
Really there’s been a pressing need for the PKK to be taken off the [list of] proscribed organisations ever since they joined the initial list in 2000…
[The] listing functions to really criminalise the Kurdish community, and also solidarity activists who get put under investigation for support for a terrorist organisation. Even though [the PKK] has never carried out attacks outside of Kurdistan and the broader region.
Keeping “smooth” relations with the Turkish state
But right now [delisting the PKK is] especially important because now we see – in cases like Aidan’s – how [the proscription is] used to criminalise people who the jury doesn’t want to criminalise, the judge doesn’t want to criminalise and the broader public doesn’t support the criminalisation of.
The only people who do want to pursue this are the state and the state’s prosecutors – presumably for behind the scenes diplomatic reasons, to keep smooth relations with the Turkish state.
There is not going to be a resolution [to this] as long as the PKK is treated as beyond the pale, in spite of all of the facts of it’s own conduct.
Delist the PKK
It’s more important than ever to demand that the PKK is removed from the list of banned terrorist organisations. The inclusion of the PKK on this list is facilitating the criminalisation of the UK’s Kurdish communities. It’s also allowing the British state to arrest and imprison people like James, who have joined the fight against Daesh.
We need to stand with those who are fighting for freedom and direct democracy in the Middle East. In order to do this, we must call for the decriminalisation of the PKK here in Britain.
Featured image via RiseUp4Rojava
- Find out more about the campaign to delist the PKK.
- Learn about the Freedom for Öcalan campaign.
- Get involved with your local Kurdistan Solidarity group.
- Join a demonstration against Turkey’s invasion of Northeast Syria.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?