Sajid Javid’s secret US deal could allow UK citizens to face the death penalty

Sajid Javid (left) and Guantanamo Bay protesters dressed as inmates (right)
Nathan Griffiths

This article was updated on 24 July at 22:26pm to reflect the fact that the UK government has stripped the two men in question of their British citizenship.

 

Sajid Javid appears to have abandoned the UK’s firm opposition to the death penalty in secret talks with US officials. The home secretary has agreed to hand over intelligence to get two former UK citizens – who fought alongside Daesh (Isis/Isil) – prosecuted in the US.

The letter

In a secret letter to US attorney general Jeff Sessions, Javid stated:

I am of the view that there are strong reasons for not requiring a death penalty assurance in this specific case, so no such assurances will be sought

Agreeing to assist the US, he clarified:

As you are aware, it is the long held position of the UK to seek death penalty assurances, and our decision in this case does not reflect a change in our policy on assistance in US death penalty cases generally, nor the UK Government’s stance on the global abolition of the death penalty.

Javid’s letter also reflects his view that the judicial system in the UK is unable to provide adequate justice. He continued:

Ensuring foreign fighters face justice raises a real challenge for all our jurisdictions, however in this instance we believe that a successful federal prosecution in the US is more likely to be possible because of differences in your statute book and the restrictions on challenges to the route by which defendants appear in US courts.

The US currently has additional charges for terrorism offences which are not available under UK criminal law, and those offences carry long sentences.

Guantánamo

The documents revealed by the Telegraph [paywall] also state that the men could be sent to Guantánamo Bay prison without trial, and with no formal opposition from the home secretary.

However, a home office source [paywall] told the Telegraph that the US has been warned not to send the men to Guantánamo, stating:

We have proactively made it clear to the US that while we will share for the purposes of a criminal trial we will not for Guantanamo Bay

Former UK citizens carrying out Daesh executions

Alexanda Kotey and Shafee Elsheikh were part of a group of four Daesh members who received the nickname ‘Beatles‘ because of their British accents. They were responsible for the beheading of journalists James Foley and Steven Sotloff. They were also involved in the murders of aid workers Peter Kassig, Alan Henning, and David Haines.

‘Jihadi John’ – real name Mohammed Emwazi – led the group prior to being killed by a drone strike in Syria in 2015. Emwazi appeared in numerous beheading videos – including the murder of US journalist James Foley.

Kotey and Elsheikh were captured in January by the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces.

UK security minister Ben Wallace confirmed on 23 July that the government has stripped both men of their British citizenship.

Criticism of Javid’s letter

Amnesty International responded to Javid’s letter by saying:

This is a deeply worrying development… A failure to seek assurances on this case seriously jeopardises the UK’s position as a strong advocate for the abolition of the death penalty and its work encouraging others to abolish the cruel, inhuman and degrading practice.

James Foley’s mother Diane also criticised the possibility of the death penalty being used on the two Daesh members. She claimed it would “make them martyrs in their twisted ideology” and give them “a much easier way out”. Instead, she insisted:

I would like them held accountable by being sent to prison for the rest of their lives. That would be my preference.

Featured image via YouTube/Val Kerry Flickr

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed