Fears of escalating violence in Libya as commander vows to fight until Tripoli is captured

The Canary

A commander in Libya whose forces are fighting to take the country’s capital of Tripoli from militias allied with a UN-backed government based there has dismissed an initiative by its prime minister for negotiations to end the crisis. Khalifa Hafter also vowed to press his campaign and rid Tripoli of what he says are “terrorist militias”.

Who is Hafter?

According to Reuters, Hafter considers himself to represent “a bastion against Islamists”. The outlet also explains that, while Turkey’s Islamist government has armed the forces in Tripoli, Hafter’s forces have received supplies from the United Arab Emirates and Egypt.

The BBC explains that Hafter “is popular in the city of Benghazi for his role in driving out Islamists”.

Hafter was once a general in long-time Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi’s army. But he turned against Gaddafi in the late 1980s. According to the BBC, he then devoted “the next two decades towards toppling the Libyan leader”. As the outlet points out:

He did this from exile in the US state of Virginia. His proximity to the CIA’s headquarters in Langley hinted at a close relationship with US intelligence services, who gave their backing to several attempts to assassinate Gaddafi.

Fears of another bout of violence

Hafter spoke on Wednesday to a local news website, almarsad.co. He said “military operations will not stop” until Tripoli is taken.

In April, Hafter’s self-styled Liberation National Army, which is based in eastern Libya, launched the offensive. The campaign, criticised by the UN and aid agencies, has killed hundreds and displaced thousands of civilians. It has also raised fears of another bout of violence after the Western-backed 2011 uprising that toppled and killed Muammar Gaddafi.

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us