To stop Jeremy Corbyn, the establishment has hushed up a legal path to a general election

Jeremy Corbyn

To stop Jeremy Corbyn, the establishment has essentially hushed up a legal path to a general election. With Labour ahead in the polls, 40 years of free-market consensus in big business, banking, media, and politics faces an existential threat. So establishment figures seem to be downplaying the possibility of a general election. The current consensus, as BBC News reported on 21 November, seems to be that:

it would require two-thirds of MPs to back [an election] under the Fixed Term Parliament Act.

But as blogger SKWAWKBOX has emphasised, a general election actually only requires Theresa May to lose a parliamentary confidence vote. Because if a simple majority of MPs vote against May and no alternative government forms within 14 days, a general election automatically goes ahead. That’s a majority (half plus one) of the MPs who vote, not two thirds of all the 650 MPs like with the other route.

How likely is a general election?

Parliament has been in deadlock over leaving the EU since the 2017 general election. And with Brexit coming to a head, it’s difficult to see where the Conservative Party can turn:

  • Under May’s deal, the government is on the verge of officially losing the support of the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), which the ruling party needs to govern.
  • Under ‘harder’ Brexit arrangements, the Conservatives risk a customs border between Ireland and Northern Ireland, breaking the Good Friday Agreement.
  • Call a referendum re-run and the Conservatives risk haemorrhaging support to UKIP in the next general election, increasing the chance of a larger Labour majority.
  • Call a general election and the Conservatives risk putting Corbyn in Number 10 sooner rather than later.

Another possible option is that the Conservatives simply ride out the transitional period until the scheduled 2022 general election. Under May’s arrangements, the transitional period can actually extend for decades.

Labour’s version of Brexit

What’s clear is that May’s Brexit deal adamantly enforces EU rules against state intervention. This is a crucial problem: the main difference between Labour and the Conservatives’ Brexit plans is the type of economy Britain will have after leaving the EU. If elected, Labour needs to be able to enact its manifesto, which includes public ownership of key industries, a renewable energy revolution, and a huge social-housing programme. For Labour, that’s how Britain really ‘takes back control’.

Such a transformative industrial strategy addresses the root causes of Brexit. Such causes are explored in a comprehensive study from the University of Warwick, which found that austerity economics was the main driving force behind the Leave vote. In fact, “slightly less harsh” spending cuts from the Conservatives (and Lib Dems) could have swayed the referendum result, according to the district-level analysis.

Let’s end failed free-market economics, and thus the fundamental cause of Brexit, with a general election.

Featured image via Edinburgh Television Festival/YouTube

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us