Fascism is now. Why we need to stop giving people like Steve Bannon a platform to air their views.

Steve Bannon
Support us and go ad-free

It looks like 2018 has been a good year for the ‘marketplace of ideas’. Steve Bannon was interviewed on BBC Newsnight in May. In October, Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, aka Tommy Robinson, got a Sky News interview as well as an appearance on the BBC. And on 15 November, Oxford Union gave Bannon a platform yet again, amid much protest.

The union is certainly no stranger to inviting far-right personalities. Earlier this month, German far-right politician Alice Weidel declined an invitation to speak there citing ‘security concerns’. It also hosted Yaxley-Lennon in 2014 as well as far-right politician Marine Le Pen in 2015. Video recordings of both events are still available to watch on the union’s YouTube channel.

The right to speak

On its Twitter page, Oxford Union – a paid, members-only debating society at Oxford University – proudly calls itself the “last bastion of free speech”. Stephen Horvath, the president of Oxford Union, defended the invitation to Bannon by saying “it is only through listening to the opinions of others that we can fully understand those opinions”. When RT covered the protests that took place outside the event, a student similarly said “I despise what [Bannon] stands for, but I believe we have to give people a right to speak”.

But if an institution such as Oxford Union refuses to invite Bannon, is that really affecting his right to speak? Of course not. Because people like Bannon already have a dedicated following and an established audience. They have enough influence not to need a prestigious stage from which to share their views. As for claiming we need to listen to his opinions to “fully understand” them, I can’t say I’ve heard anything more insulting in recent memory. I don’t need to see Bannon at one of the most respected universities in the world to understand that equating anti-fascism and Black Lives Matter activists with the KKK is an indefensible position.

Personally, I have lost count of the number of times it has already been argued that free speech is being hijacked under the guise of hearing everyone out, while empowering the privileged few. It is no coincidence that the people whose right to speak is publicly defended are invariably white, and already command enough influence to not need a platform to further their agenda. Some have suggested that the union’s decision to host ‘controversial’ personalities is more for their entertainment value, for the buzz it creates, rather than a genuine commitment to free speech.

Fascism is now

What is really frustrating, however, is the reckless abandon with which these people claim to defend free speech while completely removing it from its real-world implications. Aleksandar Hemon, in an article written in response to the news that Bannon might headline the 2018 New Yorker literary festival, says:

Only those safe from fascism and its practices are likely to think that there might be a benefit in exchanging ideas with fascists.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Hemon describes how witnessing the rise of fascism in Serbia meant he could not bring himself to see ideologies such as Bannon’s as mere ‘ideas’. Rather, fascism always has violent real-life consequences. The Nazi salutes witnessed at the protests outside Bannon’s event are an ominous sign of this reality. The swastika found painted on a sports centre in Oxford just days later, even more so.

The reality is that we are on the verge of fascism right now. And by debating fascism as though it were an abstract concept, we aren’t just blinding ourselves to this reality. We are normalising and enabling it. We see it in May’s hostile environment and Trump’s dehumanisation of immigrants and refugees. And debating it won’t help anyone – what we need is to crush it completely.

Featured image via Flickr – Steve Bannon/ Torbakhopper

Support us and go ad-free

Get involved

  • Tweet Oxford Union expressing your concern over their invitation of Steve Bannon, and ask them to remove recordings of events with far-right extremists such as Bannon, Marine Le Pen and Stephen Yaxley-Lennon (aka Tommy Robinson) from their YouTube channel
  • Support organisations like Hope Not Hate and Unite Against Fascism

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Nothing wrong with allowing Bannon, or Hitler for that matter (although the commute to the gig might be tricky) , the opportunity to air their views. It provides the opportunity to debate and discuss their ideas and counter them. That doesn’t happen if those ideas don’t get a public airing. Free speech is a two-edged sword. It isn’t just speech you like, it’s speech you don’t like too. Which is worse, putting up with speech you don’t like or accepting an end to free speech, which you seem very keen on bringing about?

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.