The MailOnline photoshopped an Olympian to look like he broke coronavirus distancing rules

The MailOnline logo and facepalm
Steve Topple

The MailOnline has generally set a fairly low benchmark for its accuracy and standards of reporting. But it plumbed new depths on Sunday 26 April. Because it quite literally photoshopped a picture of an Olympian to make it look like he had broken coronavirus (Covid-19) social distancing rules.

Feel free not to click any of the MailOnline links. Unless you enjoy funding the right-wing corporate press.

Former Olympic rower and gold medallist James Cracknell has been targeted by the MailOnline. In a sensationalised ‘scoop’ on 26 April which the right-wing rag ran with the headline:

Did James Cracknell break lockdown rules? Olympian posts then swiftly deletes picture visiting his parents

You can say the headline out loud in a shouty, gammon-ish voice if you wish. The MailOnline metaphorically screamed:

James Cracknell appears to have potentially broken lockdown rules after posting and then deleting a picture of him visiting his parents.

In the now deleted Instagram picture, which the double Olympic gold medal winner uploaded on Sunday morning, Cracknell is seen sitting in a garden next to his father.

The 47-year-old posted the picture for his 37,000 followers alongside the caption: ‘Been too long since I caught up with my folks, loved it.’

The problem is, the rag photoshopped the image that it displays on social media shares of the article.

Photoshopping for clicks

The original looked like this:

James Cracknell Insta Post

Social distancing rules applied? Check. But the image that people see on social media looks like this:

Mail on Sunday James Cracknell

No, really. The MailOnline did just do that. Cracknell wasn’t best impressed. As he tweeted:

People leaped to his defence:

Others were somewhat sarcastic in their reactions:

And Ruth Mutton made a fair and balanced point:

But aside from the obvious false inference (or lie, if you like) from the MailOnline that Cracknell broke social distancing rules, did he break the other government coronavirus guidelines?

The government says…

The official advice says that, among other things, you should only leave your house for:

one form of exercise a day, for example a run, walk, or cycle – alone or with members of your household.

That is, we shouldn’t be visiting family or friends who don’t live with us. But Cracknell was clearly in a quandary. As he said on Twitter, he was “bringing them food”. Not good enough for the MailOnline, though. It squealed that:

Where relatives are elderly or vulnerable, it is permitted to leave your house to help them, for example by dropping shopping or medication at their door. You can also help them to order online.

But Cracknell could well argue that him sitting several metres apart in his parent’s garden with them is no different, say, to seeing them in a park and standing several metres apart to talk to them. Which is not against the rules. Moreover, government schemes to protect people over the age of 70, for example access to food deliveries, are still not working properly.

Tittle-tattle

My mother, 80, who lives with moderate dementia and only one functioning kidney, has had no communication from the government about being at increased risk. Her friends, all over the age of 70 themselves, have to get shopping from the supermarket for her. This is despite government guidance clearly stating over-70s have to follow strict social distancing, because they are at “moderate risk“.

Whether you agree with what Cracknell did or not, it doesn’t warrant the Mail on Sunday doctoring a photo of him just to drive traffic to what otherwise was an article in the realms of the ‘gossip columns’. Which was actually the thrust of the piece: detailing tittle-tattle about his ex-wife. But that’s the MailOnline all over.

Featured image via Wikimedia – Alex E. Proimos / screengrab – MailOnline

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us