The Tory war crimes immunity bill is betrayal of the troops by their officers

UK soldiers in Afghanistan
Joe Glenton

The Overseas Operations Bill may or may not pass its third reading on 3 November. But for a diverse range of thinktanks, military charities, human rights organisations, legal experts, and former military personnel the verdict is already in: this legislation isn’t fit for the statute books.

The recently published report by a parliamentary committee is just the latest tearing apart of the bill. But there is more to this issue than legal details or turns of phrase to be haggled over here and there. This bill is a gross betrayal of British troops and veterans, an attack on the rule of law and human rights, and it will prevent victims of abuse by UK troops from getting any semblance of justice.

It is, of course, the case that military personnel are never the primary victims of UK foreign policy. That title belongs to those who are invaded and occupied. But as a working class veteran myself, one aspect of this legislation has a particularly personal resonance for me.

This bill will stop soldiers, veterans, and military families bringing cases against the military in the long-term. And we should be clear that cases against the military brought by people have served in it, as recent figures show, outnumber allegations from Iraqis and Afghans by 25 to 1.

Posh boy boss class

This bill can and should be read as an attack by the officer class on the men and women from the ranks. Many of the architects of the bill, and its most rabid cheerleaders in the Conservative Party, are former commissioned officers: the posh boy boss class which has, for generations, sent people like me to their deaths on behalf of British capitalism.

Many of these former officers have spent years positioning themselves as champions of the troops in parliament. This bill proves, once again, that nothing could be further from the truth.

Look through the transcript of the second reading debate in Hansard, and look up the leading figures backing the bill. You will already know some of the names.

They read like a Who’s Who of the Tory party’s anti-working class right and its foreign policy hawks: captain Johnny Mercer, late of the Royal Artillery; lieutenant colonel Tom Tugendhat, late of the Intelligence Corps; captain Ben Wallace, late of the Scots Guards; major James Heappey, late of The Rifles; colonel James Sunderland, late of the Royal Logistic Corps; captain Richard Drax, late of the Coldstream Guards; lieutenant colonel Tobias Elwood, late of the Royal Green Jackets and current reservist in 77 Brigade; and others besides.

The class dynamics of this bill are made even clearer when you look at the lack of representation of working class veterans and personnel during committee hearings.

It is true that the British Armed Forces Federation (a talking shop which occasionally plays at being a military union before shying away from the role) and the Royal British Legion (an organisation designed to bring the radicalised soldiers of WW1 “back to their old leaders, the officers”) were critical of the bill. But these establishment organisations can’t replace the voices of real soldiers, sailors, and airmen. Those in the ranks appear to have been largely frozen out of a process which will affect them most of all.

Missed opportunity

It is a great tragedy, and a commentary on the state of this country, that so many veterans have cheer-led their own stitching-up. Certainly there is a section of British society, riled up by the culture wars, which will rally around anything wrapped in the Union Jack. This bill is such a thing and many veterans are part of that section of our society.

Only more recently have people started to realise that far from being a patriotic defence of Our Boys and Girls, the bill is an assault on their rights.

Now more than ever, I lament the centrist sabotage of the last election and the missed opportunities. Because for the first time in British history, a potential prime minister, Jeremy Corbyn, pledged to consult on the creation of a proper representative body for the armed forces – in effect, a union without the right to strike – which personnel could use to defend themselves against the officer class.

I will watch the debate with great interest, but on the evidence of this bill the idea that the Tory Party is a friend to service personnel and veterans needs to be laid to rest. Because it isn’t your average soldier who will benefit from these new proposals. It is the officer class.

Featured image via Elite Forces

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. A truthful article very welcomed. Nothing like experience to know where the truth lies.
      Same old duplicity in the language by the ruling class in 1745 as found in the book the “Highland Regiments in Revolt” by John Prebble.
      David Stewart of Garth ” he could feel the chill egalitarianism of the Industrial Age, coming with the wind from Loch Tay”
      Egalitarianism is still considered to be an evil by these people 250 years later.
      Tradition or stupidity?

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.