This Martin Luther King Jr. Day, let’s not whitewash what he stood for

Martin Luther King Jr
Support us and go ad-free

As we approach Martin Luther King Jr. Day on 18 January, it’s important to challenge the dominant narratives that surround him. His history as a radical, anti-racist, anti-war, anti-capitalist leftist has been whitewashed to produce something more palatable for the mainstream. However, the iconic civil rights leader posed a legitimate threat to America’s white supremacist, militaristic, imperialist, materialistic status quo.

King stood firm against the “Three Evils of Society”: militarism, materialism, and racism. His non-violent resistance has been misrepresented as colour-blind passivity. But he was committed to fundamental revolutionary change.


Liberal and conservative commentators alike have co-opted King’s memory to discredit the aims and actions of today’s Black Lives Matter movement. Others have used his words to support harmful ideologies of colour-blindness and false unity. These are total misrepresentations of the man who sought to disrupt and dismantle systems of racial, economic, and militaristic oppression.

King’s famous “I have a dream” speech has been watered down beyond recognition. In the speech, he praised the “marvellous new militancy which has engulfed the Negro community”. Regarding events in 1963, when members of Birmingham, Alabama’s Black community rose up against white supremacist attacks, King warned the establishment:

This sweltering summer of the Negro’s legitimate discontent will not pass until there is an invigorating autumn of freedom and equality. 1963 is not an end, but a beginning. And those who hope that the Negro needed to blow off steam and will now be content will have a rude awakening if the nation returns to business as usual. …

The whirlwinds of revolt will continue to shake the foundations of our nation until the bright day of justice emerges.

Recognising that the establishment didn’t intend to relinquish power, King posited that Black people must seize it. And King’s confrontational politics led the FBI to label him the “most dangerous… Negro leader in the country”.

Read on...


King was a forthright opponent of American militarism and imperialism. He described the US government as “the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today”.

In the face of increasingly militarised law enforcement agencies and expansive military campaigns, King’s prophetic words that “a nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death” still ring true. In 2018, academic Cornel West highlighted the hypocrisy of warmongering imperialist powers summoning King’s memory.


The history books tend to overlook King’s strong anti-capitalist stance. The minister saw capitalism for what it is – a system that produces a “gulf between superfluous wealth and abject poverty”. His Poor People’s Campaign called for the “total, direct, and immediate abolition of poverty”.

Moreover, his goal was to create a multiracial working-class movement that would pose a serious threat to the establishment. King saw America for what it was, and still is. As Cornel West stated:

The radical King was a democratic socialist who sided with poor and working people in the class struggle taking place in capitalist societies. . .  The response of the radical King to our catastrophic moment can be put in one word: revolution – a revolution in our priorities, a re-evaluation of our values, a reinvigoration of our public life, and a fundamental transformation of our way of thinking and living that promotes a transfer of power from oligarchs and plutocrats to everyday people and ordinary citizens… Could it be that we know so little of the radical King because such courage defies our market-driven world?

As the fight against white supremacy, militarism, and economic inequality continues, it’s important to remember that while King stood for hope, he also stood for action.

Today’s Black freedom movement stands firmly in King’s legacy, and should be recognised as such. This year, we must challenge the selective amnesia that renders King a passive leader. And we must incorporate his holistic, revolutionary approach to change-making in today’s fight against society’s ills.

Featured image via Wikimedia Commons

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. I’m old enough to have watched MLK on news bulletins and current affairs programmes. A great man who, as the article says, was so much more than a spokesman for the neoliberals of the day. He was a figure to admire and look up to for many young people at the time, white as well as black. He wasn’t bothered about banning words, he used the word “Negro” in his speeches with pride, as it should be, but that’s not a word you’re likely to hear today. These days we concentrate too much on banning words and not enough on intended meaning and attitude. You don’t change attitudes by banning words. You define the meaning of words by changing attitudes, something which Martin Luther King understood and strived for.

    2. Martin Luther King had a lot of useful things to talk about in describing our democratic disaspora. The 3 evils being militarism, materialism , and rascism. I’m also old enought to remember him in real time. The spiritual death he has described has arrived in spades. Blacks sold their neighbours into slavery as well so the concept of imperialism needs some redefining as aggression which has nothing to do with the colour of one’s skin. This behavior applies to anyone. No rascism issue there just dementia.
      Miltitarism seems to be the issue here as it concerns itself solely with the death of another, the untimately the death of the planet as we are now observing.
      If you gave a wolf a gun I don’t think these predators would be better off in calling the shots.
      It times to think about it.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.