Hilary Mantel’s desire for new citizenship reeks of privilege

Novelist Dame Hilary Mantel
Support us and go ad-free

In an interview with Italian newspaper la Repubblica on 4 September, Booker prize-winning novelist dame Hilary Mantel said she hopes to become an Irish citizen. Mantel’s grandparents were Irish immigrants to the UK, so she hopes to reconnect with her family roots. And despite loving the part of England she lives in, she feels the need to “become a European again”. Mantel believes she “might breathe easier in a republic”. So what motivated this? Is that royal title finally weighing heavy?

Mantel says she’s become ashamed to live in England because of the abuse refugees face and because of the UK’s immigration policies. Or rather its, anti-refugee and asylum-seeker policies.

But it’s ironic, is it not, for a dame to want citizenship of a republic? And at this time too. To be fair, she did speak out about the Tory/Lib Dem coalition’s position on refugees. But neither that government’s position nor the war-mongering, anti-refugee stance of other governments was sufficient for her to seek Irish citizenship before. More pertinent is that it’s an option not available to the refugees she claims to be speaking up for.

Disgusting treatment of refugees

Mantel is right about one thing. This Brexiteer-government’s treatment of refugees and asylum-seekers is shameful. And, if Priti Patel’s Nationality and Borders Bill becomes law, potentially criminal. This shameful treatment is evident in how its currently dealing with Afghan refugees.

The UK has only promised to allow 5,000 refugees into the UK over the next year. Abdul Ghafoor, the director of the Afghanistan Migrants Advice and Support Organisation, said 5,000 isn’t enough when “there are millions of people suffering”. Ghafoor said the UK was “very tough towards refugees, especially Afghan refugees”. In the last 18 months, the UK has either refused entry or deported 177 Afghan refugees.

But that’s hardly new for this Tory government. As reported by Mohamed Elmaazi in December 2020, the Home Office kept 400 refugees and asylum seekers in “unsanitary, overcrowded, and degrading” accommodation in Napier Barracks in Kent. Residents at the former military base had been self-harming. They also said conditions “were prison-like” and worse than what they had fled. That barracks still houses refugees and has been the site of major coronavirus (Covid-19) outbreaks.

Additionally, in August 2020, Patel rightly faced criticism for attacking lawyers representing refugees. She said current regulations are “allowing activist lawyers to delay and disrupt returns”. Patel doesn’t seem to realise that words can sometimes be deadly. Such as in 1989, when a Tory junior minister claimed some lawyers were “unduly sympathetic to the IRA”. Belfast-based human rights solicitor Pat Finucane was murdered by the UDA (a loyalist terror gang) just three weeks later.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free
Not so ashamed of the past though?

But what’s confusing about Mantel’s position is that she wasn’t motivated to adopt new citizenship while living under prime ministers Thatcher and Blair. Having written a book of fiction on Thatcher – The Assassination of Margaret Thatcher – Mantel said Thatcher “was worth hating”. And that was in comparison to the current Brexiteer government – who are “not worth a story” – that have motivated her big announcement.

Yet despite such understandable loathing for Thatcher, Mantel didn’t feel compelled to seek refuge in the Irish republic during Thatcher’s tenure. Was it really that much easier to be British and feel European during the Thatcher years? Thatcher didn’t exactly have a free and easy relationship with Europe. Nor did she welcome refugees with open arms. And what of warmonger Blair?

Both he and Thatcher fought unjust and dirty wars from the coast of Argentina to Ireland – not forgetting, of course, Afghanistan. It was Blair who led us there this time around. And during the miners’ strike, Thatcher’s government launched a war on its own people. Then in her final years, she introduced the dreaded poll tax. Yet none of that seems to have affected Mantel’s view of citizenship. Nor did her accepting a title from a royal family whose global colonisation created suffering for countless refugees. In the interview, Mantel made no mention of handing that particular title back, either.

Irony lost

There can be very little doubt that this and previous governments have held the British people and refugees in utter contempt. That record is written in blood. Yet it’s only now that the dame chooses to rethink her citizenship.

All because she’s not happy that yet another British government is anti-refugee? But the real irony is this: just choosing citizenship of another country is a luxury not afforded to the refugees Mantel claims to empathise with. The fact that her views are a gross display of privilege appears to be lost on her.

It’s understandable someone would feel so ashamed of right-wing Brexiteers they’d want to adopt new citizenship. But to have already lived as a British citizen for so many years under right-wing, war-mongering, anti-refugee governments, and not do anything about it, just doesn’t stack up. Nor does the acceptance of a title from a family steeped in colonialism. In the absence of doing something concrete for the plight of refugees, I’m afraid this declaration of solidarity rings hollow.

Featured image via YouTube – Waterstones

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Why waste time and space attacking someone whose heart is basically in the right place? Attack someone like Starmer. Nationality was not an issue prior to the idiocy of Brexit. I’d like to have the option of retaining European citizenship.

    2. What a strange article! If I remember correctly the UK has only recently left the EU and nationality wasn’t an issue when Thatcher was ruling. My ‘Irish’ grandparents were born in the UK and their parents were born in Belfast and therefore don’t qualify me to acquire Irish citizenship; if it did I would seize it with both hands. Hilary Mantel has long had a bad press although it’s not easy to say why that is except she speaks her mind. Her ‘book on Thatcher’, as described here, was an amusing short story and hardly an analysis of Thatcherite politics; her bad press continues but to be joined by the Canary is depressing.

    3. This is a juvenile article. I’m not a fan of Mantel and I could easily scapegoat her as a failed writer myself, stewing in a damp bedsit since 1995. The article seems to nearly talk itself out of its utter unreasonableness several times and still her it is. I think I’ve missed the opportunity to have that citizenship by a generation but am still considering defecting, and couldn’t I say that to me staying here even in my kind of squalor is benefiting from privilege. I won’t experience the worst of what this country is and what it’s becoming. Why doesn’t the article take that no less arbitrary line?

      These causes can be pursued without dragging the wrong people into it. This is why progress gets thwarted, neurosis bleeding out into needless micro-faction.

    4. Must agree with the above. V. strange target for ire.

      My own Irish ancestry is too far back and vague for me to apply, but within 24hrs of the Brexshit vote I had already checked the Irish requirements for citizenship. Should I not have done, because this option was unavailable to Afghan refugees?

      England is in a process of terminal self-destruction, lead entirely by the donkeys from Eton and other private schools. The ‘Classics’ have their benefits, but learning how to organise and manage a modern industrial democracy is not one of them.

      It may have been ‘privilege’ that filled the Titanic’s lifeboats with rich white women first, but it would be an odd take to demand that they stay in the boat instead.

      I would more take aim at all those brexshit SUPPORTERS, who are fleeing the UK, while still hating ‘refugees’.

      Not someone with moral aims who has just thrown up her arms in disgust.

      I doubt it’s her fault that we have BloJo and Priti Itself.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.