The BBC‘s choice of one particular Question Time panellist is not going down well on social media.
On 13 June, BBC Question Time tweeted the names of those who would be appearing on its programme the following day. Among them was pro-Brexit journalist Isabel Oakeshott:
— BBC Question Time (@bbcquestiontime) June 13, 2018
Observer journalist Carole Cadwalladr, who has been at the forefront of exposing the Cambridge Analytica scandal, tweeted:
I don't know what to make of this.
— Carole Cadwalladr (@carolecadwalla) June 13, 2018
Less than a week ago, the Observer had been getting ready to publish an investigation by Cadwalladr, detailing alleged links between Brexit campaign donor Arron Banks and Russian officials. On Friday 8 June, Cadwalladr laid out the allegations in an email to Banks, giving him an opportunity to comment before publication.
Then, Press Gazette reports:
Cadwalladr said she received a call from Oakeshott… the next day asking her to delay publication until Monday, saying she would hand over the material if she did so.
Later on Saturday, the story appeared on the Sunday Times website [paywall] citing emails shown to the newspaper by Oakeshott as the main source. The Sunday Times splashed on the story the next day.
So, many people were not impressed with the BBC‘s choice of guests:
Thread. Carole Cadwalladr has shown the enormous value of intelligent, scrupulous and doggedly persistent journalism.
So who does @bbcquestiontime invite? Her antithesis, Isabel Oakeshott, who exemplifies everything that has given journalism a bad name.#bbcqt https://t.co/eYvm8s0qzd
— Why to vote Green #FBPE (@WhyToVoteGreen) June 14, 2018
Cambridge Analytica whistleblower Christopher Wylie also spoke out:
Hey @bbcquestiontime, why are you not inviting @carolecadwalla to balance this? It's ridiculous that you invite someone on who withheld critical information on Russian involvement in Brexit and not the journalist who actually forced the issue to go public #bbcqt https://t.co/vt6lem0J6e
— Christopher Wylie 🏳️🌈 (@chrisinsilico) June 13, 2018
The fact the BBC had previously put Oakeshott up against Cadwalladr on The Andrew Marr Show only seemed to make things worse:
The notion that Oakeshott has to appear to balance Carole – but not the other way around – raises serious questions about BBC consistency and professional integrity, especially as it now appears that Oakeshott was making false statements on her previous appearance.
— Steve Peers (@StevePeers) June 13, 2018
But the BBC‘s decision wasn’t surprising to some:
Isabel Oakshott? Wasn't Farage available? Not so much Question Time, as right wing nutters time. So glad I gave up watching this rubbish several years ago.
— Julie Knights (@Julie1179) June 14, 2018
People are also worried about Oakeshott’s past comments about benefit claimants and people using foodbanks. In a debate about the use of food banks, she once famously tweeted:
A bag of porridge costs about £1; will last a family all week and is far more nutritious than Cornflakes.
— Isabel Oakeshott (@IsabelOakeshott) May 18, 2017
And in August 2017, less than two months after the Grenfell fire, she wrote:
My position is that benefit claimants have no basic entitlement to state support to live in the most desirable areas of London
— Isabel Oakeshott (@IsabelOakeshott) August 3, 2017
While Oakeshott’s comments may not have been directly about the Grenfell tragedy, they clearly have connotations for the survivors – many of whom are on low incomes, meaning they need support to stay in the borough they call home.
So it’s no wonder some people questioned the BBC‘s decision to book Oakeshott on the anniversary of the tragedy:
— Michael (@PrinceJasper) June 14, 2018
Meanwhile, no one from the Grenfell community will be on the Question Time panel:
A year on from the Grenfell tragedy, not one panellist to reflect the anniversary, just one (IO) to debase it. Atrocious.
— Rick Glanvill (@RickGlanvill) June 14, 2018
Instead, the BBC has given Oakeshott a platform to spout her bile. No wonder the broadcaster’s decision has left a sour taste in so many people’s mouths.
– Support Grenfell United, who have done amazing work in standing up for the community since the fire.
– Support The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.
Featured image via liarpoliticians2/YouTube
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?