During BBC Question Time on 14 June, Conservative MP Dominic Grieve launched an unexpected and savage take-down of the Daily Mail, and specifically its editor Paul Dacre.
Credit where credit’s due
Grieve was responding to accusations in the Daily Mail that he was “supping with the devil” in attending a meeting with “avowed enemies of Brexit”. In apparent exasperation, he explained that the Daily Mail’s use of personal attacks creates:
a level of debate which makes rational discussion impossible, and it’s deliberately designed to do it. When Mr Dacre in the Daily Mail decides to raise the temperature and lead to you being bombarded with hate mail, he does it for the deliberate intention of trying to prevent people engaging in rational debate.
You can watch the video here:
"It's a level of debate which makes rational discussion impossible"
— BBC Question Time (@bbcquestiontime) June 14, 2018
Grieve’s open criticism of the Daily Mail, and Dacre specifically, shocked many on social media:
I never thought I'd see the day a Tory MP dare to criticise Paul Dacre on National Television. There's hope for your soul after all, Mr Grieve. #BBCQT
— Rachael Swindon #GTTO (@Rachael_Swindon) June 14, 2018
— Steve Topple (@MrTopple) June 14, 2018
Others, meanwhile, invoked Noam Chomsky:
“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum….” Noam Chomsky
— Kath Grant (@kath_grant) June 14, 2018
A legacy of fear
On 6 June, Dacre announced he will be stepping down from his role as editor of the Mail in November 2018, having ruled with an iron fist for 26 years. He will hand the reins to pro-remain Mail on Sunday editor Geordie Greig and move into a new role as chair and editor-in-chief of Associated Newspapers. Polly Toynbee wrote in the Guardian:
His [Dacre’s] sheer bully-power often frames the national debate by warping broadcasters’ news agendas, because they know the Mail makes politicians quake. Theresa May – his candidate – caves in to him every time, as paralysed on paying for social care as on Brexit.
Dacre’s legacy is one of fear.
From his hard-line Brexit stance including the infamous “enemies of the people” front page, which attacked the judges who decided that parliament should trigger Article 50…
— Neil Henderson (@hendopolis) November 3, 2016
… to the Daily Mail’s relentless immigrant-bashing.
As Grieve said, Dacre’s talent – if you can call it that – is using fear to stem rational debate.
Either through attacking people opposing Brexit…
I completely agree. It should be obvious I'd have thought. The rhetoric of these papers also serves to intimidate leave voters by leading to a climate where they are less likely to voice their opinions if they feel threatened by the other side of the argument.
— Derek Cowan #FBPE #A50Challenge #WATON (@DerekCowan2) June 15, 2018
… or through creating a hostile environment for immigrants in the UK, by deflecting the blame for society’s problems away from the establishment and onto the less powerful:
— Camilla van Gerbig (@curiocat13) June 15, 2018
Or as one Twitter user put it:
The Daily Mail is a toxic force in national life. #Brexit
— Dr Matt Prescott (@mattprescott) June 14, 2018
A growing trend
As a sitting Conservative MP, Grieve’s savage criticism is surprising. But Dacre’s impending departure has emboldened many. Writing in the Mail on Sunday, Rachel Johnson expressed hope that with new leadership the Daily Mail will become “less inflammatory and more inclusive”. And former Daily Mail journalist Helen Lewis finally spoke out about her time in its clutches:
The Daily Mail may not change its spots overnight. But news of Dacre’s departure has certainly opened the floodgates to criticism of its aggressive, fear-mongering approach.
A Tory MP openly bashing the paper on Question Time was shocking to many. Let’s hope it becomes the norm.
– Support The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?