As the Conservative leadership contest trundles on, now is the perfect time for unity in the Labour Party. The UK’s divided; and with many wannabe PM candidates threatening a no-deal Brexit, the stakes get higher each day. And Labour is the only party trying to bridge this divide and appeal to both Leave and Remain voters in order to tackle more critical issues. But then, along comes deputy leader Tom Watson.
“True to who”, Tom?
Labour is ahead in some polls as the Conservative Party flags. But worryingly, the Brexit Party also seems to be gathering support. Yet the recent Peterborough by-election suggested that Labour’s position – keeping all options on the table – could be vital to win elections.
On 17 June, Watson insisted that the “left hasn’t countered” right-wing rhetoric about Europe. He also went against Labour policy and said, “we must argue strongly to remain” in the EU. Astonishingly, he also argued for “solidarity”, and said “socialism is achieving common causes by the strength of collective endeavour”:
The core values of the EU are: Internationalism, Solidarity, Freedom. They are British, Labour values. Our future doesn’t need to be Brexit. We can change our future. But only if Labour makes the case for it – and we must. #proudlybritishproudlyeuropean pic.twitter.com/YKr5RoeLgF
— Tom Watson (@tom_watson) June 17, 2019
He later said:
Our members are Remain, our values are Remain, our hearts are Remain. We need our Labour Party to be true to who we are, and be loud and proud in support of Europe.
"Our members are Remain, our values are Remain, our hearts are Remain. We need our Labour party to be true to who we are"
— BBC Politics (@BBCPolitics) June 17, 2019
It’s true that many Labour voters don’t want to leave the EU. But what Watson fails to acknowledge is that roughly 148 Labour constituencies voted Leave, while 84 voted Remain. Although this is difficult to calculate because the referendum results “weren’t counted by constituency seat”, these figures do reflect the “general pattern”. So Corbyn’s Labour sits between a rock and a hard place, since fully backing Remain would potentially alienate Leave voters. This could open the door for the Brexit Party to gather support, or for a hard-Brexiteer-driven No Deal.
Watson knows this, because it’s Labour policy to keep “all options” open – including a “public vote” – and it has been since 2018. Above and beyond anything else, Labour wants a general election.
With this in mind, many people noted that Watson’s move looks a lot like “sabotage”:
Labour *had* a clear anti Brexit position in 2016. It backed Remain
Then came EUref, Leave won, in 9 out of 12 UK regions, over 400 of 650 seats, many in Labour heartlands
Anyone suggesting Labour switch to Remain now is trying to stop a Labour Govthttps://t.co/J7TiYyQHml
— Mrs Gee #GeneralElectionNow (@earthygirl01) June 17, 2019
@tom_watson by insisting that Labour campaign for Remain, you are dismissing the democratic mandate of 17m people, and you are pushing us towards a Boris Johnson no deal Brexit.
Are you deliberately trying to sabotage a Labour executive under Corbyn?
— Richard James Conway (@RichCon81) June 17, 2019
‘Ten reasons to ignore Watson’
If Watson ignoring Labour Leave voters wasn’t dodgy enough, then perhaps he needs a reminder of parliament’s Brexit votes since January. As grassroots socialist group Tory Fibs pointed out, no matter what Corbyn’s done to try to challenge Brexit, including an amendment for a second referendum, these votes keep failing in parliament:
10 reasons why you should ignore Tom Watson's efforts to hurt the Labour Party pic.twitter.com/WlOiaIU10A
— Tory Fibs (@ToryFibs) June 17, 2019
In May, the Campaign for Labour Party Democracy issued a letter for Constituency Labour Parties (CLPs) to sign. This letter outlined the “harmful divisions” caused by Brexit and the need to:
address the horrendous societal problems that face us, especially those caused by ten years of austerity ruthlessly imposed on the disadvantaged by the Tory’s and Lib Dems.
The letter cautioned against “politics of bitterness and division” and called for Labour members to ‘stand together’. As it also noted, this is vital when facing “the desperate efforts of the hostile press and media to muddy the waters”. It also warned against a “very negative and harmful approach of saying, ‘bollocks’ to half of the population and to millions of Labour voters”.
Please bring this motion to your next CLP meeting 📰
We cannot say 'bollocks' to half the population and millions of Labour voters pic.twitter.com/ChqlQy4lZy
— CLPD Labour (@CLPD_Labour) May 27, 2019
Watson, meanwhile, seems resolved to entrench division further.
“Time to fuck off”
Watson seems determined to undermine Corbyn no matter what, while entrenching division even further. In many ways, he’s sunk even lower than Chuka Umunna, who at least left Labour and (finally) joined the Lib Dems. As Twitter activist Rachael Swindon wrote:
So Tom Watson will be doing his latest treachery today, in a desperate act of trying to maintain some sort of relevance.
Despite his many flaws, at least Chuka Umunna knew when it was time to fuck off and make his way towards a political outfit more in line with his ‘values’.
— Rachael Swindon (@Rachael_Swindon) June 17, 2019
@tom_watson dude, stop attacking the Labour Party all the damn time, if you’re so desperate for the tories to be in power just fuck off and join them already
— Wulf Kredovich (@WKredovich) June 17, 2019
‘Fuck off Tom Watson day’ seems to have become every day
— Dec (@Decliano) June 17, 2019
If this latest speech presents Watson’s version of “solidarity”, then it’s one that Labour really doesn’t need. And it seems it’s one that many Labour supporters don’t want either.
Featured image via screengrab
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?